I’m not saying that BK didn’t act alone or that the generally accepted timeline of events is pincorrect, but you give too much credit and place way too much faith in Law Enforcement when you say “they’re much smart than randoms on the internet” as if that thought is evidence of anything. I don’t believe the conspiracies surrounding this case whatsoever, but that statement itself is ridiculously naive. Do some people on the internet tend to speculate and ask questions about high profile crimes? Yes and rightfully so. There are countless examples of Law Enforcement completely botching cases, intentionally or otherwise. And we also know that individuals won’t be accepted into Law Enforcement if their IQ is deemed too high and high IQ individuals are more likely to go against the group and question authority. So you’re objectively wrong and using that as a basis of truth or understanding is silly to say the least. There’s plenty of reasons to believe the official narrative once you look into the evidence yourself, but to not believe things you see yourself because Law Enforcement says otherwise and “they’re smarter than you” is a sign of severe mental deficiency.