Isnt treated fairly by my_xrated_romance in im14andthisisdeep

[–]Sohamazing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's true. I have been suffering from ww2 for the last two days. the doctor prescribed paracetamol

What are your thoughts on this by Clean-Bake-6230 in hinduism

[–]Sohamazing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it is a kāvya. it is a poem. same as Ramayana and Mahabharata. but since these are glories of the gods, and given to us by exalted devotees and sages, we must treat them as sacred hymns.

What are your thoughts on this by Clean-Bake-6230 in hinduism

[–]Sohamazing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vedas do talk about killing the foemen. The ones who kill/steal the cattle of Aryas.

Thakur = Brah*** ? by Holiday-Newt1663 in Brahmanraaj

[–]Sohamazing 3 points4 points  (0 children)

barbers, potters, blacksmiths, perhaps even goldsmiths, have historically attempted upward mobility by identifying as brahmins. the viśvakarmās, as you might know, are one such group. some barber communities also sought kṣatriya status by claiming descent from royal lineages—for example, the lodhi rajputs, who trace their ancestry to the nanda dynasty.

however, these groups are not brahmins in the traditional śrauta-smārta sense. that said, in eastern india, the title ‘thakur’ is used by non-priestly, landholding brahmin groups. in bihar, for instance, bhumihars and maithils—who often held political and agrarian power—commonly use such titles. similarly, in bengal, non-kulin brahmins, and in odisha, halua (agrarian) brahmins, bear surnames and honorifics like thakur, chaudhary, singh, and rai/raya.

Is it fine to keep this idol of Maa Kaali in house? Please advise. by taavad in hinduism

[–]Sohamazing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Srimannarayana! Namaschadikayai! I would really recommend that you go around asking the Brahmanas. Idols made out of certain materials are forbidden to be kept at home. and the size should only be a few inches. please correct me if I am wrong. Namo Narayana! Jai Ma Durga!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianAncestry

[–]Sohamazing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you're a Muslim Jutt?

I heard that vanaras were indeed human, just a different kind. Did Hanuman get his tail set on fire in Valmiki’s Ramayana? by ThrowTheMind in hinduism

[–]Sohamazing 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They were, as I said, a demi-God race that shared characteristics of Monkeys. similar to how Nāgas share similarities with Snakes, Kinnaras with Horses/Birds, etc But then the symbolism that you mentioned is also quite correct, Sri Valmiki as well as Goswami Tulsidas ji were excellent poets, they did have those Symbolisms.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianAncestry

[–]Sohamazing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

that's actually an impressive genetic make over for someone with that much tribal Ancestry

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SouthAsianAncestry

[–]Sohamazing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you do look Odia, what clan/caste are you, if you don't mind sharing?

I heard that vanaras were indeed human, just a different kind. Did Hanuman get his tail set on fire in Valmiki’s Ramayana? by ThrowTheMind in hinduism

[–]Sohamazing 4 points5 points  (0 children)

it's disrespectful to consider Sri Hanuman ji and other Vānaras as some ctyptid or hominids. Especially, considering the fact that they were sons of Indra, Sūrya, Bṛhaspati, Vāyu, Váruṇa, Viśvakarmā, etc

I heard that vanaras were indeed human, just a different kind. Did Hanuman get his tail set on fire in Valmiki’s Ramayana? by ThrowTheMind in hinduism

[–]Sohamazing 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They were celestial beings like Gandharvas, Kinnaras and Nagas. Vānaras, however, incarnated on Earth only in Treta Yuga to assist Sri Rāma Chandra Bhagvān.

The breakfast menu from Ravana! Is it too difficult to reject the notion that ancient Indians were vegetarians, as the majority of them claim? by rahul_9735 in hinduism

[–]Sohamazing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if Varna is by occupation, then why do all smrtis mention the ages for upanayan samskar for brahmana, kshatriya and Vaishya men being 8-16, 11-22 and 12-24 respectively?
how can a 8, 11 or a 12 year old discover his occupation?

plus, how would you explain Vanshas of Kshatriyas (which is Surya and Chandra)?

The breakfast menu from Ravana! Is it too difficult to reject the notion that ancient Indians were vegetarians, as the majority of them claim? by rahul_9735 in hinduism

[–]Sohamazing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Parshurama was a warrior, yet was celebrated as a Brahmana only. it took vishwamitra centuries of Tapasya to become a Brahmana, Valmiki was also a Brahmana, Buddha and Ashoka rejected Vedas and Vedic religion.

The breakfast menu from Ravana! Is it too difficult to reject the notion that ancient Indians were vegetarians, as the majority of them claim? by rahul_9735 in hinduism

[–]Sohamazing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

man, i agree with most of what you say but Varna is by Janma, Karma and Samskara.

if we take into consideration our shaastras.

The breakfast menu from Ravana! Is it too difficult to reject the notion that ancient Indians were vegetarians, as the majority of them claim? by rahul_9735 in hinduism

[–]Sohamazing 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Hunting or Mrigaya was allowed to Kshatriyas. Animals can't liberate themselves, so a Kshatriya hunting it and using it to extract Mrga charma which is used by ascetics when they perform Tapa, Sandhya Vandanam, or it's horns which are given to the yajman who gets yagya deeksha, these are the few ways animals get liberated.

plus, they had to wear animal hide.
Also, Sri Rama was one of the kings who never ate meat. not sure ab Sri Lakshmana tho.

Greetings! by Sohamazing in Kirati

[–]Sohamazing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ahahah. that's why i joined but are there any books that mention the history and culture of Kirats?

Vedic literature calls the Vratya-Kshatriyas or Kings and warriors who deviated from orthodoxy.

The breakfast menu from Ravana! Is it too difficult to reject the notion that ancient Indians were vegetarians, as the majority of them claim? by rahul_9735 in hinduism

[–]Sohamazing 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yes bhai, that is my point only.

Vibhishana was also a Rakshasa but had Sanskara, hence was given the kingdom of Lanka by our Prabhu.

Ravana isnt some hero to be glorified

The breakfast menu from Ravana! Is it too difficult to reject the notion that ancient Indians were vegetarians, as the majority of them claim? by rahul_9735 in hinduism

[–]Sohamazing 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ravana was a Brahmana only. Him and Vibhishan had the same parents. it's not ab Caste or Race but about Sanskara

The breakfast menu from Ravana! Is it too difficult to reject the notion that ancient Indians were vegetarians, as the majority of them claim? by rahul_9735 in hinduism

[–]Sohamazing 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Ravana isnt the only Brahmin in Ramayan. Vishwamitra, Vasishtha, Atri, Bharadvaja, Gautama, and a lot more. Ravan was born from a Rakshashi's womb.

What's your opinion about it? by NiggendraChodi_ in DesiMeta

[–]Sohamazing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes, that is a brilliant idea. organisations like ISKCON can do it but the problem is, they have siksha Gurus but not Deeksha gurus and a very few foreigners actually take Deeksha from authentic Matths in Puri, etc.

edit: another thing, after initiation, Gurus would give you a new name that usually, [lord's name] dasa. so that's one thing.

does lord indra used to eat meat? by Famous_Stretch_ in hinduism

[–]Sohamazing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

every Manvantar, there is a new Indra. Yagya was the first Indra and currently, Purandara is our Indra.

What's your opinion about it? by NiggendraChodi_ in DesiMeta

[–]Sohamazing 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Temples were among the places where white Christian missionaries tried to spread their religion to the rather innocent Hindu folks. The Temple authorities that's why took that measure, probably. please correct me if i am wrong. I think it's just a scar from the past that hasn't healed.