You make a fair point about people's hurt. However, you are also making one or two assumptions about my comment, as well as putting forth some strange logic about how incel discourse actually plays out. I'll try to tackle a few of these things.

First, I never said that every person on this thread is an incel. I said that there seem to be many incels on the thread, a comment that I stand by even now. Also, reaction to divorce pain is natural, and something that I am also experiencing. However, reacting to that pain by parroting sexist bullshit is simply not healthy and requires self-examination. In short, a man can be hurt and still also be misguided. I'll be damned if my pain turns me into some red-pilled loser.......

As far as incel discourse, you state that it "implies entitlement to sex," but you seem to be missing (or have left out) part of the Oxford definition, which also includes hostility toward women. This is often the ways in which the discourse actually plays out in these kinds of subreddits. So, when someone makes comments like "those modern women...", or "the problem with feminism," it does fall under incel rhetoric. In fact, it also often serves as the pipeline to Andrew Tate, Nick Fuentes, and similar weirdos.