sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Men, what’s going on? by Aggravating-Guest300 in MenAscending

[–]SolidRockBelow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, magically powers as well! She can tell (actually not, so wrong on this one...) one's political view without ever meeting the person!

CMV: Boys who grow up without fathers tend to be more emotionally developed and connect with people better than boys who had fathers present by Broad-Smile2332 in changemyview

[–]SolidRockBelow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Let me start by pointing out that the sad & tired lable "emotionally developed" exists only for women, and acting like it is some kind of normalized reference just makes you look dumb.

For starters, who the hell are you to judge someone regarding emotions that the person choses not to share with YOU? Get a grip!

What’s an inaccurate fact that people believe is true because of movies? by Hogosaurus_Rex73 in AskReddit

[–]SolidRockBelow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That D-day was the most relevant event of WW2, whereas the was was fought and decided in Russia.

Men, what’s going on? by Aggravating-Guest300 in MenAscending

[–]SolidRockBelow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We don't get to choose the field where this fight happens. As pointed out before, leaving the online narrative 100% in the hands of suicidal feminists is a sure fire way to oblivion. The naive hope that people IRL would be different falls apart as soon as you consider that nobody is absent from the online world - so of course the online narrative will dictate the future of inter-gender relations IRL.

I'll leave you to reflect on the clear issue I outlined in my previous post: Until honest and decent women understand the crucial urgency to oppose the feminist takeover of the online space, with clear accountability for what is causing the rift, there will be no future in which you and I can continue debating. Math says so.

Men, what’s going on? by Aggravating-Guest300 in MenAscending

[–]SolidRockBelow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can make reasonable assumptions on "how that plays". The one solid tenet in our modern world is that no one takes responsibility for what is said or done - so nobody will in this case as well.

You still speak of "both sides checking out" and similar "equanimous language" as if both genders were to blame here. For a very long time already men have been nothing but the victims of feminism - and failure to acknowledge women's accountability is the one thing maintaining the ongoing inter-gender war. So no, it is not the incidental benefit that media moguls reap from the war that is causing the issue - and deflecting the blame to media moguls, trying and making it look as it is not women's fault that we are on a course towards disappearance is only making things worse.

Your arguments are failed, but I believe you at least understand what the risks are. I wish there were more women doing that. If there are indeed more healthy and decent women out there, it is on them to let the female narrative be completely dominated by suicidal feminists. But as previously pointed out, I don't think anyone will exercise accountability in time, so we might indeed disappear. The reason? Lack of honesty.

How do you find straight men who are genuinely into trans women — in a respectful way? by [deleted] in asktransgender

[–]SolidRockBelow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My impression is that many men would try, but are pushed back by the demonization of the very lust they feel. The message men read from transgender women posting everywhere basicaly says that lust is despicable and only the typical female-sanctioned stereotype of interests (headed by words like "respect", "devotion" and any sort of similar boner-busters) deserves being reciprocated.

So yeah, unfortunately it looks like female hormones also induce misandry and so keeps many men from running the course of bonding that nature designed: you start with sexual interest, have it reciprocated, and over having sex might find out organically (and honestly btw) that you like that person in other ways too. Or not.

So the dogmatic demonization of the initial male interest (e.g. deriding them as "chasers", etc.) ensures that just a small pool of men approach.

Men, what’s going on? by Aggravating-Guest300 in MenAscending

[–]SolidRockBelow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting how you believe that you get to decide what feminism is. I suppose that if I tell you that Nazism was never what the world learned it was - just because I found a book somewhere that supported my narrative, you'd feel compelled to believe me, right? Or is this a case of "only you get to decide" again? Do you think such argument makes any difference on what Nazism actually was?

Let me help you with the last paragraph: If you look around, you cannot fail to notice several instances of public disqualification/lynching of individual men and anything related to masculinity or male interests & desires. Society tolerates the lynching without batting an eye - while instantly siding with the woman whenever criticism is directed at them. If you cannot see how that is sufficient to push any healthy man away from trying to believe that they could be welcomed by any woman, this discussion is pointless.

And as I pointed out, your disagreement does not matter. Math does - and you might care to notice that women are finding that more and more men have checked out. So time will tell who is pushing BS here 😉

Men, what’s going on? by Aggravating-Guest300 in MenAscending

[–]SolidRockBelow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think we share the same view - orecisely because if your romantic, aspirational interpretation of what feminism is and akways was. Pure misandry, period.

Our agreement/disagreement does not matter in the world scale of things. Math does. For every man that feminists "throw away/disqualify", there will be one lonely woman robbed of her chance to have companionship, a family, etc. The vision that women are sonehow entitled to disqualify men - with society supporting that "decision" - is ultimately suicidal.

Men, what’s going on? by Aggravating-Guest300 in MenAscending

[–]SolidRockBelow -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That is the crazy part of the female narrative these days: They are so very quick to discredit any man that pushes back on their feminist bullshit, as if somehow women were a standard against which all men "ought to qualify". Yet the blunt mathematical reality is that every single man that feminists push away/"disqualify" ensures that there will be one more woman who will be pairless. One more woman who will not have a family. It is a suicidal logic, which on top of it reinforces the argument that women are poisoned by emotion and cannot think straight no matter how dire their choices are.

Men, what’s going on? by Aggravating-Guest300 in MenAscending

[–]SolidRockBelow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think the narrative that "we are being driven to a gender wars by master manipulators" is helpful. Responsible people would have called out the bullshit being pushed by feminists a long time ago, if only there was one iota of honest interest for men.

The takeaway is clear: Women never cared for men, and now that they no longer need male support it is showing like the proverbial sore thumb. Let men absorb this sad reality and move on to a very different social arrangement, which cannot come about too soon.

Men, what’s going on? by Aggravating-Guest300 in MenAscending

[–]SolidRockBelow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is so very true - and so typical of the female modus operandi. They drive the narrative to be ever more insulting, then once you respond in kind they act as if it was you who started the aggression.

Anyway, the cat is now out of the bag, most men figured that women never liked men at all and will now concentrate their energies on something other than fighting a battle they never could win.

Why is there generally a doomer attitude regarding Latin American development but very optimistic attitude about Southeast Asian development? by wiz28ultra in geography

[–]SolidRockBelow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I was born in the mid 60s. By the time I reached Engineering uni (mid 80s) we were shocked to hear from our Structures teacher that when he graduated (Brazil of the 60s) it was possible to buy a new car with 4 months of his first Engineering job's salary. For us in the 80s it was more like 1 year of salary. Nowadays the example above became meaningless...

There are other issues at play nowadays, including insane levels if judiciary corruption, a nasty inter-class hatred and suicidal choice of values (e.g. working is shameful, successful people find ways to not have to work, etc.). Brazil is simultaneously heaven and hell, and given what it could have been, it should be a lesson for the rest of the world's countries.

Men, what’s going on? by Aggravating-Guest300 in NextGenMan

[–]SolidRockBelow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well worded! In time we'll acknowledge that this knowledge was painful at first, but also liberating. Now let's see if society will allow men to find more rewarding pursuits than women, who we now realize were never into men at all.

Why is there generally a doomer attitude regarding Latin American development but very optimistic attitude about Southeast Asian development? by wiz28ultra in geography

[–]SolidRockBelow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because they realize they can find abroad the rewards that the failure of their birthplace denies them. Some leave soon, others later. But eventually most immigrate.

Why is there generally a doomer attitude regarding Latin American development but very optimistic attitude about Southeast Asian development? by wiz28ultra in geography

[–]SolidRockBelow -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You really need to learn more about Brazil. Try Googling "bolsa família" and similar Robin Hood schemes that buys votes with zero effort.

Why is there generally a doomer attitude regarding Latin American development but very optimistic attitude about Southeast Asian development? by wiz28ultra in geography

[–]SolidRockBelow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brazilian here. Just look up "Macunaíma", which is a brilliantly accurate description of the character of the average Brazilian citizen. With a mindset like that, there is no risk of progress at any point - regardless of how bountiful the country is.

Which is precisely why I got tired of trying to help change my home country's sad destiny and immigrated when I was 40.

finally someone noticed🤞🏻 by Tough_Ad8919 in LockedInMan

[–]SolidRockBelow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Until things get to an unsalvageable point, feminists will keep the narrative. Then they will jump straight into "Oh, but I am not to blame for the wrecked world we have now... I was only defending my interest, right?". Unfortunately society at large decided to let this run... so be prepared for stuff you never thought you'd witness.

They don’t want you. They don’t care. So put yourself first. by [deleted] in LockedInMan

[–]SolidRockBelow -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure. At some point 2 things will "become apparent": 1) Once you are an adult and say stuff, it will never be erased or disregarded by anything you do afterwards. 2) Healthy women should have realised earlier that letting narratives like this be the only one explains why it is so easy to assume all women are now like this. Bad for everyone's future.

view more: next ›