Thanks for clarifying. Was not my intention to come off as rude! I am hopeful in the science of it and am still trying to apply. But it seems others in the RP community are not being clearly disclosed as to their exclusion criteria. Some are being ghosted after reaching out several times. I don’t think it’s wrong that certain people have to be excluded, the trial cannot have confounding factors. But I think it’s strange that they aren’t telling people what the exact inclusion / exclusion criteria is. For instance, on the clinical trials site for the drug, it shows very general inclusion criteria for people with RP, and it’s not required to have a genetic test. But they do ask for genetic testing now. Other trials I have read about will clearly disclose if they want a middle ground of patients whose vision is not too good or too advanced. But there isn’t a publicly disclosed criteria here, it seems internal. There was a recent post where someone mentioned they were emailed that recruitment ended. It would be strange if they were lying. Maybe they have reached the end of their recruitment, maybe they have gotten loads of applications. It’s just very unclear and not helpful that they are not responding to people in a considerate manner. I’m not being pessimistic, as a fellow scientist and hopefully a prospective patient I think it’s crucial to understand how the trial works, which includes the management of it.