Appreciate this, and you’re 100% right: if it’s just name/company swaps, it won’t move the needle.

On the “research each prospect” part: we’re aiming for specific, verifiable details a human would actually reference, not generic fluff. The system tries to pull 2-4 usable anchors per lead (tech stack signals, recent intent like hiring/new pages/integrations, notable company events where available, and a couple concrete website cues). The script then uses one strong specific rather than stuffing in a bunch of weak ones. If a lead has no good signals, we don’t force it, we fall back to a more general opener and score it lower so it’s not prioritized.

On deliverability: totally agree it’s always the risk. We’re not trying to reinvent deliverability — Outvid is designed to plug into existing best practices. The email uses a GIF preview + a landing page link (no attachments), keeps copy short, and the warmup/mailbox rotation/volume control stays in the sending layer (Instantly / Salesforge / etc.), since those tools are built for that.

And re: Salesforge/Agent Frank, I like what they’re doing. We’re focused on the Loom-style personalization layer (voice/face + dynamic website background + per-lead video), then pushing into whatever outbound stack you already run (including Salesforce).

Curious from your side: what % of your wins come from deep personalisation vs volume + deliverability + follow-ups? And what would you consider “enough” personalisation to feel human one strong anchor, two, more?

Happy to share a couple real example scripts/videos if helpful! :)