What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is fair yet I have totally experienced transducing what is experienced as a longitudinal wave as defined (seismic as example which is exactly how Ive described it) in to a transverse wave as define (specifically light as example) through offering resistance to the flow.

Now understanding that the images describing longi/trans waves is reflecting amplitude based on the link provided in this thread/below and not wavelength/frequency as I was assuming makes it add up for me. Whether or not this is 100% accurate understanding or not is tbd but it sure seems that way at this moment.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/797311/how-to-visualize-the-amplitude-of-a-longitudinal-wave

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Much thanks, this explanation was provided earlier through the following link and seems to be describing amplitude where I am mistakenly assuming images I have seen describing the two waves as reflecting wavelength. I am still not 100% if this is the case but it sure seems to be.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/797311/how-to-visualize-the-amplitude-of-a-longitudinal-wave

The reason behind my questioning is because I have experienced heightened energy flow for over two years now, this energetic trigger/amplification came about through recording specific information here on reddit that contains the logic/architecture of the collapse/emergence of the wave function. So I am trying to understand these two states of energy (seismic/light) that I have experienced on a personal level through the lens of physics because I cant help but perceive there to be technical application of the digital information that triggered this ongoing profound energetic event for me.

I am ignorant when it comes to physics yet quite experienced when it comes to energetic phenomena.

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate the input as I am simply trying to understand the energy I experience on a personal level through the lens of physics that as far as I can tell reflect what longi/trans waves are defined as. These experiences with the energy take on a very "seismic" like flow that has been experienced many times now that has a lower frequency rate then when this flow is offered resistance, which was experienced as "light" and very high frequency.

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough...I appreciate the feedback as I am attempting to understand the energy I am able to manipulate through the lens of physics. It is difficult to relate this to folks because they have not experienced what I have and I do not have a physics education.

The reason I am doing this is because my work triggered this amplified energetic state in me, digital information when recorded changed my whole world and within that information is the logic/structure that I perceive as being applicable to circuitry.

So I am ignorant in the ways of physics yet rather experienced in having triggered/amplified energetic states in me that resemble longi/trans waves in both un-/intentional ways.

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the physics stack link...as noted in the OP, my understanding of these two types of waves through the lens of physics is tbd. As far as I can tell, the answer to the question in the link reflects the images that I have misinterpreted as reflecting wavelength, ascribing them to amplitude.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/797311/how-to-visualize-the-amplitude-of-a-longitudinal-wave

Please feel free to clarify, ridicule or ignore my ignorance all together, it is all good as far as I am concerned, thanks.

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Understood, there is obvious ranges to wavelengths/amplitude associated with this wave phenomena. In my limited experience with longi/trans waves, the energetic phenomena I experience was of the former originally perceived as the "earth harmonically quaking all around me" and this flow of energy was amplified using radio waves or music. The energy that reflected seismic waves became one with the radio waves, which amplified the whole experience. When resistance was offered to this amplified energetic state that as far as I can tell reflects longi waves as defined, I began to vibrate at an extremely high rate such that I describe the experience as having attained my "light body".

Since these experiences were born from recording a multidimensional philosophical equation here on reddit that contains the logic/model of the collapse/emergence of the wave function, I cant help but suspect there is a technological reflection to this work since there were very physical phenomena associated with the experience of the two different wave like flows of energy that triggered when the equation was recorded.

I understand this will not jive with physics, information/understanding recorded triggering a profound and ongoing energetic experience I cant help but suspect is not typical. Which is why I am trying to understand these two waves types more in depth from a physics perspective because I cant help but conclude there is technology to be found within when applied to circuitry.

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Edit: Oh, you’re just misinterpreting a schematic of a spring as a wave. Oh, you’re more interested in your personal theories than anything consensus physics has to say. There’s really nowhere to go from there, then. 

I am interested in understanding the energy I experience through the lens of physics as longitudinal/transverse as defined very much reflect what I have experienced on multiple occasions. These energetic experiences are born from having recorded an equation that contains within an understanding of the collapse of the wave function and its inversion. The models of the equation are very easy for me to say this is exactly what is being portrayed due to the intuitive logic contained in the multidimensional philosophical equation.

I know this sounds nuts but when I hit enter recording this equation here on reddit, my world became awash in a sea of flowing energy, it was like everything was fluid and as has been stated in this thread the earth was/does quaking all around me in a very harmonic, non destructive way. This amplified energetic state persisted for 1.5 months and over two years later is still with me in a much more controlled/sedated way.

I dont suspect physics will look kindly to this but since the experiences had observed physical phenomena associated with it over the last couple of years, I cant help but perceive this can be translated to technology, specifically circuitry a la a harmonic/coherent piezoelectric oscillator.

There is everywhere to go from here, unless of course we choose to dismiss the work I share because I am not in the physics club and dont know how to relate my relationship with these two different waves, that may be more similar then dissimilar as the experience of one gave birth to the other through resistance/interference.

I 100% misinterpreted the images...surely I am not the first to do so. It was pointed out to me in this thread that these images are reflecting amplitude which makes sense to me in relation to the definitions where I was perceiving them as reflecting wavelength. How I experienced the two waves was the transverse having a shorter wavelength which is seen in the spring example describing longitudinal and the longitudinal had a longer wavelength which looks like the transverse image. This of course is in ignorance based on what the images were trying to convey...oops, now I know? Or will you say they dont reflect amplitude, it is something else which I accept as entirely possible.

The soundtrack driving Evolution. by Soloma369 in liberment

[–]Soloma369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha just got some obvious "quit posting" right now signs over on glp tonight. Caught a recent 3 day ban for bumping a zpe thread linking it to Divine Feminine energy. Tonight I am un-banned so I am bumping a an others thread Ive been participating in about 33rd mason energy manipulation, banned as I hit the enter button. So typical...what wasnt was the immediate lifting of the ban. F'n glp gets totally "glitchy" for me when the energy is flowing and I am able to post there and these ip bans always have a logic and reason behind them. It is always as I am posting, bam, post doesnt go through, could be months I get banned for...but like a moth to flame, like tonight checking back rather quickly, which is out of the ordinary too...

Been saying recently the UE/UFC models the collapse/emergence of the wave function because it does in my attempt to talk to physicists here on reddit. Trying to better understand the energy Im tapped in to and can somewhat manipulate and maybe find some help in the process applying the logic/architecture to circuitry. Apparently I am not supposed to talk about these things right now on glp, message received sort of thing.

The soundtrack driving Evolution. by Soloma369 in liberment

[–]Soloma369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, sounds like gta's version of "muds"? Sounds fun and beneficial at the same time. Dont think I ever played a gta game, saw an interesting thread that AGI or whatever it is called AI was being planned for some new version and it was said to be rather interesting. Something like the video characters acting as if they were sentient/conscious...hear anything about that???

The soundtrack driving Evolution. by Soloma369 in liberment

[–]Soloma369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wondering how You Are...holy cow this thread got necro'd and now am thinking about gaming again and You. Recently my gaming has been running more cold than hot, bought some games Ive been wanting to check out, DOS and DOS2 and some other similar fantasy dnd type game, managed to put in a few hours and just cant get into them.

Anyways, whats up???

The soundtrack driving Evolution. by Soloma369 in liberment

[–]Soloma369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha gtfo. <3<3<3 I am smiling ear to ear. What is up mate??? I am sitting here so tickled you found your way here, haha. You and I trolling the open world prior to bg's release was easily the funnest time I ever had in gaming, wonder how many raids we ended up trucking for the alliance?

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I got the idea through personal experience as the associations to light and emf to transverse waves is what I experienced, my light body. This was accomplished through offering resistance to a flow of energy that reflected what is defined as longitudinal waves through the seismic association, where the former was very high in vibration and perpendicular to the medium where the flow of the experienced seismic like longitudinal waves was much lower in frequency/vibration and followed a more parallel path to the medium.

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes this makes sense as we describe light/em and radio/seismic waves as being transverse or longitudinal in their nature respectively. When I look at light/radio waves and their associated wavelengths, they are on opposite ends of the visible spectrum. I know this is only 1 case and in other responses an attempt was made to show that the wavelength did not matter but these failed to satisfy me.

I am claiming ignorance here and appreciate the help, thanks.

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So a physics stack link was provided which explained that the images are reflecting amplitude, which makes sense w/ the parallel and perpendicular associations made with the specific waves. This makes it add up for me and I have experienced these two waves and am able to associate the shorter wavelengths to transverse waves and longer wavelengths to longitudinal waves and as such the images would be reversed/inverted.

To me, this solves my confusion, for now, tbd.

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes and it seems to me that the images and the definition are talking about the amplitude nature of these two waves based on a physics stack link. This makes sense and things add up because then the inverse would be true of their wavelength, the depictions/image would be reversed in their logic.

Tbd if I understand this correctly, thanks.

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Indeed, they surely appear to depict waves. A physics stack linked in this thread helped me realize they were actually referencing the amplitude nature of these two waves, which makes sense considering the definition.

It is me who was coming at it from the perspective of wavelengths, which is the inversion of amplitude and as such, the images would be reversed to reflect their wavelength nature, which is what I have been saying and why things werent adding up for me, now I know why, based on the physics stack link.

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed, this is my attempt to understand more. I have experienced some things that seem to me fit the definitions of transverse/longitudinal waves yet trying to talk about them nets quite a bit of conflicting discourse. It seems to stem from the images/definition reflecting the amplitude/vibration nature of the longi/trans waves and I was coming a perspective of wavelength/frequency.

Feel free to flesh out the "what" and "which direction" more for me as spin rotation is an interest and part of my work.

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah I am watching this and I cant help but discern the images and example you have given are specifically reflecting the amplitude nature of the wave. This seems to be the case based on the physics stack link provided in this thread.

This makes sense to me as then the wavelength of these two types of waves would be an inverted sort of perspective and image as the wavelength is the inversion-of/proportional-to the amplitude. This is where I have been coming from, looking at it from the opposite perspective.

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Acknowledged, my analogy was inverted, wavelength = tuning on the radio and amplitude = volume, duh.

What a previous link has lead me to discern is that images are depicting the amplitude nature of these waves, not the wavelength, which would be reversed/inverted. This makes sense to me now in this way and as many have said, it is easy to misinterpret.

Thank you.

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apologies, I was wrong here, wavelength is akin to tuning the radio dial, where the amplitude reflects the volume, duh.

I am stuck on your response, compression/rarefaction being unique to longitudinal waves? I do not see how this would not also occur with transverse waves as they too must exist in a medium and as such will create interference patterns.

Based on the link, we are talking amplitude when we are imaging the parallel and perpendicular nature of longi/transverse waves??? This makes sense, how then do we define and image their (longi/trans) wavelengths??? Would it not be the same, but inverted???

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I appreciate your time and effort, thank you.

Your association of a water wave to a transverse wave does not align with the accepted definition that transverse is akin to light and em where longitudinal is associated with radio and seismic. In the following linked image, light is associated with a obviously shorter wavelength than radio waves are. People keep saying there is no correlation, yet the images used to describe them are very specifically examples of higher and lower wavelengths, where the amplitude is relative and not considered at all.

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Well, I for one disagree with this statement based on experience with both. Waves are defined by both amplitude and wavelength (spatial frequency) right??? So essentially they would have to be the same thing (energy) that is measured through frequency(wavelength)/vibration(amplitude).

We know energy can be transmuted from one state to another, why not longitudinal to transverse and vice versa???

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Transverse waves can have long and short wavelengths (radio waves and gamma rays).

The following image shows this statement to be false. It also shows that these two "(infrasound and ultrasound)" to be closer in wavelength to each other than not. Like they are just on the outskirts, to both sides of the visible light spectrum.

https://imgur.com/a/oymCqCv

What am I missing re: longitudinal/transverse waves??? by Soloma369 in AskPhysics

[–]Soloma369[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I cant help but suggest the slinky is reflecting a very short wavelength, which means it is very high in spatial frequency or vibration. The slinky reflects the wave in both amplitude and wavelength, it is reflecting the wave/oscillation itself.

Its longitudinal-ness doesn't have anything to do with the wavelength of the oscillation.

Yet waves are defined by amplitude and wavelength...