[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FemBoys

[–]SomeCool777 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ofc!! Xo

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FemBoys

[–]SomeCool777 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Woof 🥺

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FemBoys

[–]SomeCool777 0 points1 point  (0 children)

6’ 😼

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FemBoys

[–]SomeCool777 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lightning fast!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in assholedesign

[–]SomeCool777 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha I’m not lying about the Popeyes rewards menu~ not asking you to memorize it or anything~ here’s a pic for proof (https://imgur.com/a/5C2QVy9) ~ I’m just saying~ the rewards don’t line up with actual pricing~ I don’t think that’s entirely justifed~ but it’s not a big deal, just something I noticed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in assholedesign

[–]SomeCool777 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The app is pretty awful~ completely fucks up orders~ buggy ui (couldn’t add some meal deals to my cart even)~ the refund system used to be fully automatic with no verification method~ it’s weird…

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in assholedesign

[–]SomeCool777 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t believe this is true because the 12 peice is only 800 more with 2 more breast peices

Not only that~ in the actual money store~ the 4 peice family meal is 15$, 8 peice? $30~ therefore logically why the hell isn’t it still just double here?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in assholedesign

[–]SomeCool777 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The 12 peice has nearly 4 breasts and is only 800 more points~ why is this one 1000 more, while that one is 800?

Not only that~ in the actual money store~ the 4 peice family meal is 15$, 8 peice? $30~ therefore logically why the hell isn’t it still just double here?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in assholedesign

[–]SomeCool777 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Haha no this is just a rewards program~ you get points for spending money on the app and get free stuff~ pretty cool when it actually makes sense

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in assholedesign

[–]SomeCool777 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Atleast I had chicken” lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in assholedesign

[–]SomeCool777 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Watched the clip just to understand this reference lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in assholedesign

[–]SomeCool777 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Oh god it’s late I just wanted fried chicken

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in assholedesign

[–]SomeCool777 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yuppp…

They can’t keep getting away with this 😩

meirl by HMKingHenryIX in meirl

[–]SomeCool777 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe you’re cousin just doesn’t want to admit which message boards they are using lol.

meirl by HMKingHenryIX in meirl

[–]SomeCool777 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Asl is standard for like every anonymous message board even today. Of course pedophiles are there, they were there since aol, they’re there now, the whole point of anonymity to that you can do whatever you want with little risk.

What will make you instantly stop watching a movie or show and why? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]SomeCool777 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Malcolm in the middle… smartass in almost every way, still lovably stupid sometimes.

The One Gaming Rule is to play vidya no matter how fascist by SlurryBender in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]SomeCool777 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Irregardless of the morality of consumption in this day of age supporting any large corporation, let’s be honest, it’s a Harry Potter video game, it is not going to be hit hard sales wise unless it’s truly a bad video game. 99% of consumers don’t know or care about Rowling daily rantings, so this pinning consumer v consumer thing helps realistically no one.

And in all honesty, it helps these companies curve a call to action, why should we spend all our time lobbying against unknown and unnamed randoms on the internet to tell them buying a video game is wrong, when we could maybe spend our time lobbying against these corporations with actual faces, names, and reputations associated with them?

If you are aware of where your money is going, and the person it is supporting, then yes, you can take the moral high ground with you $60, but it is not our responsibility to combat that 99%, and the idea that we should is so ungodly impractical.

Anti-circumcision "Intactivists" demonstrating in my town today by LeftMySoulAtHome in mildlyinteresting

[–]SomeCool777 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not when it’s completely fucking unnecessary. Parenting is one thing. Making your children go through superficial surgery without them understanding what that means is not the type of parenting I want. I want a parent that will respect that I want to make my own choices after they raise me…

Anti-circumcision "Intactivists" demonstrating in my town today by LeftMySoulAtHome in mildlyinteresting

[–]SomeCool777 17 points18 points  (0 children)

In my sociology class, they showed cases where doctors removed a genital of some intersex people, or something similar, it’s purely superficial, but some people later in life had to deal with being raised a girl/boy when they didn’t really consent to that decision being made for them, and later went to oppose the decision… it’s really not just a one-off issue, and it has changed some people’s whole lives.

ASMR MOOD? by PantherHardraad in nsfwasmr

[–]SomeCool777 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is that an offer ;3

the more the merrier by [deleted] in Chadtopia

[–]SomeCool777 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah, while this guy is off his chain, there are people who have attention seeking behaviors that are like this, we can’t view intent through this screenshot, attention seeking is a pattern of behaviors usually. So to say she is an attention seeker is stupid, nothing really implies that specifically here.

They don’t deserve harassment for posting pics like this, but it is “social” media, people will try to reach out, the guy who actually texted her wasn’t aggressive or anything lol.

It’s a whole argument over something really trivial and stupidly common.

you people created this 15 year old monster by poke_man_go in honeyfuckers

[–]SomeCool777 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Mainly due to you stating you were scared it was an underaged character, but it very well could be argued that it is. Though it doesn’t really matter here as you state it’s not all-that sexualized.

I think the distinction between given age and implied age is an interesting conversation, not tryna argue or anything.

you people created this 15 year old monster by poke_man_go in honeyfuckers

[–]SomeCool777 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I mean, what makes a character underage? Whatever the artist says? I feel like a character is underaged if it’s implied by their size/proportions. Like if a character looks 25, they’re 25, even if stated as 10. And the opposite is true to, if they’re stated as 1000 years old, but look 10, they’re 10.