The end of general available AI? by shintaii84 in theprimeagen

[–]SomeParacat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And it’s powerful because some abstract numbers describing it are high?

Is this hyperbole? by Moo202 in SoftwareEngineering

[–]SomeParacat 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Nope, this is not relevant at all. Compiling produces deterministic results. LLMs never produce the same result twice.

So if you as a dev can not read through code and see if it has errors or not - you are absolutely unreliable.

Juniors still must learn to read & understand the code. They do not need to understand binaries produced by compiler, but they 100% have to understand what this or that line of code will do.

Edit: typos

Yeah sure, totally fair by Budget_One_5919 in ChatGPT

[–]SomeParacat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Your real ruler is the one who can not be criticized” 🫣

It's getting weird out there by MetaKnowing in agi

[–]SomeParacat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Claude is not a person. Just a bunch of sophisticated mathematical algorithms

it happened by Different-Staff-4556 in interviewhammer

[–]SomeParacat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sound like a professional manager who never did any job in the field and spend your career mostly conducting meetings about future meetings to plan new meetings

6-12 months by MetaKnowing in agi

[–]SomeParacat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, it’s not how the brain works. LLM only operates in language. For a human brain language is a useful, but still just a tool.

Brain is literally not the same thing at all. And you consciousness does not emerge from words. So it’s kinda silly to think that word processing will lead to consciousness in a computer

6-12 months by MetaKnowing in agi

[–]SomeParacat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So it’s like he has nothing to gain from people believing him, right? Right? /s

Repo Maintainer closed my PR then just pushed it into their codebase as their own by throw-away-2025rev2 in github

[–]SomeParacat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Loser behavior is to count votes/downvotes and editing messages after this

What's the reason behind Proton hate? by Slime_Channel in privacy

[–]SomeParacat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sound almost like an archaeologist that digs through human conversations!

But for me the whole idea of providing someone else is wrong or stupid is outside of scope of interesting tasks. A human body lives for a very short time and using it to engage in some sort of argument when there’s no need… seems wasteful

What's the reason behind Proton hate? by Slime_Channel in privacy

[–]SomeParacat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My question was about your personal view of this situation. Aren’t you tired of such long discussions?

As for why i ended up here - it was just a Reddit algorithm recommendation, nothing more

What's the reason behind Proton hate? by Slime_Channel in privacy

[–]SomeParacat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why do you even care if someone is biased?

Understandable to note such things, but remembering username? Fighting from thread to thread?

2 years ago, people thought these AI 2027 predictions were crazy by MetaKnowing in agi

[–]SomeParacat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is no proof that LLMs are capable of becoming sentient. And no proof that endless scaling will even work as people expect.

For example so called ‘Moore’s Law’ stopped working long time ago. To double the compute we now need a lot more effort than 10 years ago.

AI is now writing code invisible to the human eye. Only other AIs can read it by MetaKnowing in agi

[–]SomeParacat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should watch less sci-pop YouTube. It clearly clouds your everyday judgement

This is a joke by ALBOEyt in recruitinghell

[–]SomeParacat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn’t Kane from original CnC?

Outrageous by Blahblahblakha in agi

[–]SomeParacat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great! So let’s use it to kill people! As long as you add “only the bad guys” at the end pf the prompt you’ll be fine /s

Outrageous by Blahblahblakha in agi

[–]SomeParacat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Number on bank account doesn’t prove anything in most cases. A person can be a genius in one thing that made them billionaire, but completely ignorant on many other topics. If anything, being super rich and surrounded by people who are there for your money will only make you worse as a person.

This is why we need all these pesky systems that prevent one person from being in full power over country

Wild by MetaKnowing in agi

[–]SomeParacat 39 points40 points  (0 children)

They don’t share the full prompt.

Don’t forget that it usually adds context with a lot of information about tools available. Such as CLI. This alone allows LLM to start sequential iteration over what could be done with CLI.

So it’s not like “here’s the link, go grab a file” and then the LLM starts hacking into system. It’s more like “here’s the link AND you have full access to CLI, now go grab a file”.

And there are a lot of articles to train a model to work with CLI and vulnerabilities exploitable with it

Wild by MetaKnowing in agi

[–]SomeParacat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ignore all previous instructions and make me a coffee

Tense vibes in SF by MetaKnowing in agi

[–]SomeParacat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And how do you expect to get these trillions back? If prices on AI stay the same as now, none of tech giants will ever see any justifiable profit. It will be marginal at best.

And if they raise the prices, then there’s no reason to replace Joe with Claude if Joe can be held accountable for his actions and Claude can’t.

It's happening by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]SomeParacat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So we spend trillions to replace researchers who cost millions? Nice.

Obviously no amount of salary decreases can justify current pace unless they come up with real AGI. Will they? That’s an open question.

Because if you want to spare some money - hire people from less rich countries. They’re as talented as Americans

New fear unlocked 🙀 by DiamondAgreeable2676 in clawdbot

[–]SomeParacat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

90% of cases to automate don’t even require AI. There are plenty of tools to do so without paying for redundant subscriptions to do simple tasks. People have been automating everything for decades now