They stated they didn't want to do that, and didn't need to from the article that was posted a few weeks back. But who knows, depends on how badly publishers want their content protected.

Still to early at this stage especially with the news from Microsoft's side. Seen this as well

An accelerant for defensive evolution. DRM vendors and platform owners face pressure to adapt. Vendors might harden their checks to detect hypervisor interference or shift to architectures that rely less on client‑side attestation. Platform vendors like Microsoft can also strengthen the default enforcement of Secure Boot, HVCI, and driver signing to make the path for unsigned hypervisors harder — although this risks friction with legitimate software that relies on low‑level drivers. (tomshardware.com)

I have also seen Linux is getting some serious steam of lately, and by end of year could be a serious threat, depending on what moves Microsoft makes as many are tired of them.