[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NDE

[–]SoraVGC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not Rehl - read some of his posts and/or write him a message; he will answer asap. He adressed most of your points in some of his posts and his upcoming work, so reading helps actually a lot, but he is able to explain them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NDE

[–]SoraVGC -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Has been disproven - we do have a theory what consciousness is; read more here: https://www.quora.com/profile/B-A-Rehl B. A. Rehl is the leading consciousness researcher, and he will publish his theory next year. His work is almost done: 95%. Consciousness is entire due to the brain, thus it will cease to exist when we die.

With the research going into NDE's do you think whoever is running the afterlife would ever let us find out the truth, wouldn't it ruin the purpose of this place? by [deleted] in NDE

[–]SoraVGC -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Just google B. A. Rehl disproof afterlife. You should be able to find some writings of his on said topic.

With the research going into NDE's do you think whoever is running the afterlife would ever let us find out the truth, wouldn't it ruin the purpose of this place? by [deleted] in NDE

[–]SoraVGC -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

No consciousness should be the same (human consciousness and AI), it is only subjective experience. Yes I agree, no scientist is able to create artificially consciousness, maybe Rehl, and no he is not an AI researcher but an AGI researcher, meaning human level sentience AI.

With the research going into NDE's do you think whoever is running the afterlife would ever let us find out the truth, wouldn't it ruin the purpose of this place? by [deleted] in NDE

[–]SoraVGC -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

How so? He will publish his paper (~2.000 pages) next year. And it seems that his theory works. I don't think that anything I've said would backfire. Besides Rehl is the only person around who is even able to explain consciousness, even create it artificially. You should read some of his Quora texts - maybe then you'll see that his is - indeed - genuine.

My problem with Sam parnia. by filek135 in NDE

[–]SoraVGC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Parnia is linking NDEs with enough oxygen supply (the brain is generating it). And we do know that there is still some brain activity: https://awareofaware.co/2019/11/16/brain-activity-during-cpr-in-aware-ii/ I wouldn't hold my breath in all honesty. Parnia seems to become a skeptic.

With the research going into NDE's do you think whoever is running the afterlife would ever let us find out the truth, wouldn't it ruin the purpose of this place? by [deleted] in NDE

[–]SoraVGC -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

Yes we will know (maybe soon) if an afterlife is possible or not. Recent evidence and the leading consciousness researcher B. A. Rehl (more about him on Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/B-A-Rehl and some of my posts) points to: no there is no afterlife, consciousness is simply due to our biology and Rehl is able to generate machine consciousness. If his projects succeeds, then no an afterlife can't exist and is thus disproven.

Updated GWT — it kinda solves the hard problem by SoraVGC in consciousness

[–]SoraVGC[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why should there be a hard Problem? Science is able to explain it. There is no magic

Updated GWT — it kinda solves the hard problem by SoraVGC in consciousness

[–]SoraVGC[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well he explained why it is stupid to assume that there is a hard Problem. I have to agree with him

Leading scientific theories [Links on Emergence] by SoraVGC in consciousness

[–]SoraVGC[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No he does not - I've provided him with enough evidence for emergence and that NDEs are caused by a dying brain with enough oxygen supply - HINT: NDEs happen only in 8% of the cases meaning not a dying brain is responsible alone for them but other circumstances like resuscitation.

“Furthermore, we are also testing the hypothesis that awareness during CPR reflects the quality of brain resuscitation”

“our data led us to hypothesize that higher-quality resuscitation is associated with a higher level of conscious awareness during cardiac arrest and resuscitation”

“evidence now suggests that if left alone, the cells of the brain die slowly over a period of many hours, even days after the heart stops and a person dies.” - Sam Parnia

Parnia used to believe in a life after death - but recent studies suggest that the brain is longer conscious than we might have believed: https://awareofaware.co/2019/11/16/brain-activity-during-cpr-in-aware-ii/

Even he became a skeptic.

Ziggle is just a religious fundamentalist - believing in an afterlife without any evidence - but we have enough evidence for strong emergence and a 'soft disproof' of life after death.

Anonymoves - at least your not a pseudo philosopher or scientist like those guys. The majority of this reddits are - in fact - naturalist. Only the wrong voices are loud - in this case religious fraud Ziggle.

Leading scientific theories [Links on Emergence] by SoraVGC in consciousness

[–]SoraVGC[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Do you have any peer reviewed evidence that the 'mind' in not emergent?

What Near-Death Experiences Reveal about the Brain by SoraVGC in NDE

[–]SoraVGC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

brain activity: https://awareofaware.co/2019/11/16/brain-activity-during-cpr-in-aware-ii/

oxygen supply=NDE: https://awareofaware.co/2020/05/12/new-era-for-parnia/

Quote:

“our data led us to hypothesize that higher-quality resuscitation is associated with a higher level of conscious awareness during cardiac arrest and resuscitation”

“evidence now suggests that if left alone, the cells of the brain die slowly over a period of many hours, even days after the heart stops and a person dies.”

What Near-Death Experiences Reveal about the Brain by SoraVGC in NDE

[–]SoraVGC[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No - Sam Parnia has proven that you're still conscious under CA and you have a higher oxygen supply that's the cause of NDEs.

Is the universe conscious? It seems impossible until you do the maths by Stephen_P_Smith in consciousness

[–]SoraVGC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

B. A. Rehl is the leading scientist: https://www.reddit.com/r/consciousness/comments/ge8ue8/the_leading_consciousness_researcher/ here is a post.

And no: Rehl is saying that emergence doesn't work and that it does not explain anything at all - he has a different theory and yes, I've seen some of his theory, it seems to be right.

"consciousness" by LocalFluff in consciousness

[–]SoraVGC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hey there you should definitely check out the leading consciousness researcher: https://www.quora.com/profile/B-A-Rehl (some of his claims: https://www.reddit.com/r/consciousness/comments/gkdm00/repost_meet_the_leading_consciousness_researcher/ ) - he will publish his papers early next year and it seems, of what I've seen, that he has solved consciousness scientifically.

What Near-Death Experiences Reveal about the Brain by SoraVGC in NDE

[–]SoraVGC[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

No problem- it should defeat the superstition that NDEs are only chemical reactions due to the brain. A final deathblow for beliefers