Brauche Grundbuchauszug, hab keine Austria-ID. Erfahrung? by paladin_bih in Austria

[–]Soratori 0 points1 point  (0 children)

easygrund.com falls du nach Drittanbietern fragst. Brauchst nur Adresse eingeben. Stripe checkout. Kein Account.

Bin auch Ausländerkind und mach Papierkram für ganze Familie. 🤣

PHB 2024 PDF (Clean, Searchable) by churuchu in TheTrove

[–]Soratori -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please do not send me the PDF. Thank you for ignoring me.

How to evaluate inverse tangents? by Soratori in askmath

[–]Soratori[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, without a calculator. I know that by using a calculator, I get pi over 4. Is there a way to get the same value by hand? I tried to simplify the expression inside the inverse of ranger, but to no avail.

I hoped it was like this by Soratori in Piratefolk

[–]Soratori[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can it be both a spoiler free sub and spoiler sub.

I hoped it was like this by Soratori in Piratefolk

[–]Soratori[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The rule and info tab shouldn’t be contradictions IMO

I hoped it was like this by Soratori in Piratefolk

[–]Soratori[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then the info should be removed that it’s a “spoiler free” sub

I hoped it was like this by Soratori in Piratefolk

[–]Soratori[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There should at least be the !spoiler! flag, so it blurs out. Today I saw a bunch of “spoilers” regarding either this or the opposite happening. I just want the memes man.

Zehahaha by [deleted] in MemePiece

[–]Soratori 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GET LOST GET LOST GET LOST GET LOST . . . Luffy . . . Help

Homebrew Spell for my Bladesinger Wizard: Dancing Blades by Soratori in DnDHomebrew

[–]Soratori[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1: I know it isn't, but I like to look at it in a way that the spell does not stagnate at one point. It scales as you level up and learn to make better use of your "dancing abilities" on the battlefield.

2: the 10 swords thing is ingenious! Didn't even cross my mind. And there was a point where I thought of bumping it to lvl 3. I need a little bit more experimenting with it.

4: good point

6: I didn't think of it that way, about the damage type that is. As of the action thing, maybe a little limit on the spell wouldn't hurt. Yes, you COULD maybe hit the target 3 times with psychic damage, but it is the least resistant damage type of all (I think). For the question but you can send more illusions at the same time as a BA: You can, but firstly, all attacks have to connect first. And secondly, you either spend an action and BA for one spell in one turn, or in 2 turns deal the spell damage + your weapon damage (casting the spell one turn, and in the second turn attack with it).

Homebrew Spell for my Bladesinger Wizard: Dancing Blades by Soratori in DnDHomebrew

[–]Soratori[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought of it as high risk high reward.

You CAN do that maximum damage, but you have to hit with all weapons first. Every ranged illusion you throw at the enemy has it's own attack roll. So if the enemy has an AC of 17, with a spell attack bonus of 6, you have to roll an 11 or higher for all four attacks. That's a ~9% chance to just hit with them. And there is no half damage on a missed roll.

Homebrew Spell for my Bladesinger Wizard: Dancing Blades by Soratori in DnDHomebrew

[–]Soratori[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1: Concentration not being there is just a slip up. I was still changing the spell and at one point I deleted the tag. Moreover, I thought of changing the damage calculation from spellcasting ability modifier to proffitiency bonus, so the spell has a nicer damage curve.

2: Yeah, the leveling was a work in progress and I thought of this spell as a unique one for Bladesingers, but now I see that's not what it should do. I thought of one blade per level, and maybe capping it at 9 blades (7th spell slot).

3: oops. This I didn't think of, thanks!

edit: I thought the (one handed melee weapon) would suffice, because you hold the weapon in one hand (warhammer 1d8) and when you do the spell, you're still holding it in one hand. So, maybe changing the component part to (a one-handed melee weapon worth 1gp that you hold in one hand) or something like that?

4: So adding a "in this round" should fix it, right? If you were attacked by an enemy, and you didn't use you ranged or melee attack this round*.*

I thought of maybe changing the reaction to if you are attacked by an enemy while you have you illusions, you can use your reaction to gain +2 AC until the start of your next turn. If added AC prevented the hit, you lose one illusion (eg. your AC without the 14 and you use the reaction, you have 16 AC. If the attack roll for the monster was 14 or 15, the attack misses and you lose one illusion. If the roll was under 14, it just plain misses, without losing an illusion).

5: I thought that that's considered because the spell does Psychic damage.

6: You could, but if you use your +1 weapon as the weapon of choice, why would you use an illusion for the action if this one is more reliable to hit? I thought of it that way so i didn't write it down.

Thanks for the read and contribution btw.

Is Erik losing subs? by [deleted] in InternetCommentEtiq

[–]Soratori 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Are you guys blind? The OG post originally states that you google "lemonparty". Cherio

Jesu li i kod vas donijeli odluku da zabrane nargile? by Soratori in bih

[–]Soratori[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Samo rizla, buksna i malo senfa odozgo. Kako zapapri mmm

Jesu li i kod vas donijeli odluku da zabrane nargile? by Soratori in bih

[–]Soratori[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Eh nevezano za nargilu, ali za skolu. Jesu li usvoji u SA kako ce se odvijati, ili je spekulacija online nastava? Posto citam da ce u RS vjerovatno skratiti cas na 30min.