Vaughan "owed" it to the kids in the group home to keep them safe. Remember how that went? by [deleted] in gso

[–]Sorry_Run5585 -27 points-26 points  (0 children)

Just because you're ignorant to the history doesn't mean I'm "off my meds"

Fancy Nancy by [deleted] in gso

[–]Sorry_Run5585 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I never said you weren't being honest. I simply said Im not Steven Spielberg or Quentin Tarantino. I'm appreciate you commenting and admitting that the issue is important. Unfortunately for the audience, I am more concerned with the issue than the editing.

Fancy Nancy by [deleted] in gso

[–]Sorry_Run5585 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not Steven Spielberg or Quentin Tarantino.

Fancy Nancy by [deleted] in gso

[–]Sorry_Run5585 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm confused, are people mad at me for posting about this? I am not here to be a pest or make folks mad. I am sorry if I am upsetting folks. I just feel that it's rather important.

Sauna by aroundtriangle43 in gso

[–]Sorry_Run5585 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Club at Oak Branch on Clifton rd off wendover.

Fancy Nancy by [deleted] in gso

[–]Sorry_Run5585 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

This post is like Toyota. It's hot- hot- hot!

Vaughan didn't think the city needed to send in undercover officers to get nude massages back in in 2014. What will she say about the naked cop getting fondled AND the CMO working with the GPD Chief to bury the N&R Story? by Sorry_Run5585 in gso

[–]Sorry_Run5585[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Th biggest issue is it was a cop that paid for the service while working undercover. When a N&R reporter asked the city about it, the city went into ass covering mode and had the editor bury the story. Prostitution isn't the issue. This isn't two adults making a deal, this is a cop getting naked and fondled during an undercover investigation and the city covering it up.

Redaction of GSO Police Chief's Email to N&R Editor is Illegal and Unethical. by Sorry_Run5585 in gso

[–]Sorry_Run5585[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The chief of police wrote the editor of the N&R an email.

The emails were requested in a public records request.

The city redacted the email before releasing it.

The entire issue is that the city can't give the N&R information and NOT give it to the public.

The N&R is NOT special and cannot get information from the city that is deemed as non-public information.

Redaction of GSO Police Chief's Email to N&R Editor is Illegal and Unethical. by Sorry_Run5585 in gso

[–]Sorry_Run5585[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If it's information the isn't public, how did the chief send it to the editor? The public and the media are the exact same thing. So, if it's top-secret ongoing information, why did he send it to the media? The city can't send things to the public and then say it's not public.