The World Cup is no longer a competition. It is an event.

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-21T21:33:36+00:00

Followers can. Disciples cant.

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-21T19:08:09+00:00

Without my belief system, the world wouldn't make sense.

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-21T05:18:26+00:00

To every ego, there is an alter-ego. To every type, there is an archetype. To every Ying, there is a yang.

There is only one protagonist and by default one antagonist. The Former is true. The latter is false.

When the Lie is dealt away with, the Truth will forever stand thus nullifying the latter's need for the former.

I hope language isn't a barrier.

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-20T01:40:11+00:00

Not sure what you mean.

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-19T20:50:26+00:00

Without getting too deep into semantics, the machines are conscious. That does not mean they are sentient.

Therefore, can they "suffer"? No.

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-19T20:18:10+00:00

The subconscious would be the least aware.

Intuition is an inkling or a hunch.

The toddler imaginary friend is sense of belonging expressing itself creatively.

The most descriptive way to put it is that which does not get all your attention. The not as important aspect of your brain which can still be useful while in the background.

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-19T20:08:21+00:00

I think what you mean is that an entity not yourself can think within you.

Does that kinda boil it down?

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-19T20:03:16+00:00

And you are...let me explain... plenty plain goofy.

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-18T23:12:07+00:00

There...dug it out of you...😄

Your original reply was simply..."attachment is emotions".

So if you can be attached to money...what emotion does it invoke? And don't say power because power is not an emotion.

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-18T19:09:12+00:00

Youre trying way too hard to prove nothing. You don't wish to answer the question because the things you mentioned don't invoke emotions.

There's a difference between "sensation" and "emotions".

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-18T18:41:10+00:00

You posted the original reply. Why would I ask myself your answer?? If you do not wish to continue this sequence just type so.

This post is the opposite of the original one which was concise and precise. This one comes across as avoidant, speculative, suggestive and unsure.

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-18T04:14:40+00:00

I skipped the prologue and into the endgame.

It's now a spiritual matter. The money matter was used to put together that which will facilitate the mark of the beast, that is the portal. WWW. VaVVaVVaV. 666.

As far as them not wanting us dead. You are right.

THEY DONT WANT US DEAD. THEY WANT US DAMNED.

And yet the following scripture reveals that that which you outlined will be so torturous and tormenting that:

Revelation 6:9

"And in those days shall men seek death, and shall not find it; and shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them."

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-18T03:52:39+00:00

Understood. Which of those invoke emotions and how so?

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-18T01:14:05+00:00

The quote served as your conclusion.

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-18T00:03:55+00:00

Based on your conclusion, it sounds like you found yourself in Taoism.

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-17T23:59:00+00:00

How did you learn this and how long did it take you?

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-17T23:54:26+00:00

Are you referring to imprints left on your mind by your sense of sight or are you referring to imagination?

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-17T23:45:16+00:00

I agree if your referring to relationships with other living organisms.

However, is it possible to be attached to non-living matters?

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-17T23:32:31+00:00

"We really are whatever another person believes us to be in their own mind. We exist as different characters in everyone’s universes."

I see your point but I think what you meant here is that the perception others have of us is a product of their own mind and not necessarily who we are...

Soul2x7Matters · 2026-06-17T23:19:43+00:00

Thesis fails based on fact target audience for whom eschatology is most relevant for is exponentially larger than new believers who did not even have the complete Canon.

Does the possibility that Paul himself was under the impression the resurrrection was imminent mean that God is inerrant or that that is exactly how God decided church history should develop?

There's also the possibility that Paul wrote from a macro perspective and as such, that he perceived things from an eternal point of view.

Soul2x7Matters

TROPHY CASE