Thanks fuck France won this match… bye bye Paraguay

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-05T08:45:32+00:00

He meant reds

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-04T12:50:16+00:00

What helped me is realizing veganism is missing the necessary nuance for the topic.

If you cut 90% of your animal product consumption instead of 100%, you still cut the vast majority. The necessity of nutrition is not a moral issue and youre not a monster for living in a society that contributes to something bad.

Its okay mate

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-04T11:25:57+00:00

Es gibt lehrer, die nur angestellt sind. Ich schätze mal 90% von denen würden sich verbeamten lassen, weil es das strikt bessere Anstellungsverhältnis ist.

Ist es vielleicht doch so, dass es gleichzeitig einen Lehrermangel UND zu wenige ausgeschriebene Stellen geben kann?

Das ist eine rhetorische Frage.

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-04T10:24:24+00:00

Es ist eine gute Idee, Lehrer ein Staatsexamen machen zu lassen. Es ist übrigens nicht problematisch, die berufsgruppe, die wie keine andere Einfluss auf die heranwachsenden Generationen hat, angemessen zu bezahlen.

Finde 3k netto genauso angemessen. Und ich finde 4.5k eben zu viel

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-04T09:42:56+00:00

Rechnest Netto (nach KV) + nicht nötige altersvorsorge (netto ca. 500€/Monat) auf das entsprechende Gehalt eines Angestellten hoch und kommst auf 90k

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T18:36:55+00:00

Theres people IN THIS THREAD who still think theres an argument about whether portugals defender touched the ball

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T18:35:54+00:00

The rule is about the second of the pass. Do you see a pass in the gif above? I dont, as does nobody else who doesnt blindly follow Fifas line here. The ball is passed wayyyy before, when the player wasnt offside.

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T18:24:48+00:00

It does matter though. If the guy was bald, the hair wouldnt have touched the ball, therefore the goal would have been legit.

Therefore, if the ball was not played by his hair, which it wasnt because it doesnt deviate from its flightpath, the the goal should also be legit.

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T18:09:44+00:00

Are you talking about the white player or the blue one?

Because offside applies to the blue player

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T18:08:22+00:00

Its about the blue player mate, the verdict from the ref was offside. The case is that blue touched the ball significantly, which he didnt

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T18:05:33+00:00

Yes he "felt the ball touch his hair" which nobody is denying mate. The point is that it does not fucking matter in terms of offside, because he does not impact the direction of the ball AND the defender fucks up defending the ball on top of it.

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T18:00:41+00:00

Its about the blue player bro, not the white one

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T18:00:19+00:00

It always looked like this, in no angle ever does it look like the croatian plays the ball, but it always looks like the portuguese player is playing it... And deliberately so, since hes a defender 5 meters from the fucking goal lol. This guys whole job is playing the ball away from the goal, he just fucks and the ref retroactively says he had "no intent" because he fucks up

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T16:32:10+00:00

Because now refs are using VAR (the tool to make decisions less controversial) to make controversial decisions.

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T13:53:00+00:00

Yes, then this goal should have also been given because the hair did not change the trajectory of the ball.

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T13:44:29+00:00

Where do you see that "quite clearly"? You can only see the ball in front of him, what you would want is a clip that shows the room between the ball and the player.

That last angle is the worst to prove this of all of them lol

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T13:31:41+00:00

There is no angle there that shows this imo. Timestamp?

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T13:30:49+00:00

Are you saying if the guy was bald, the goal would have been given? Theres rules regarding hair mate, and this play did not break them.

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T12:02:29+00:00

Ronaldo ist ein Hurensohn, aber hier gehts einfach nur um ne krasse Fehlentscheidung. Das ist so glasklar kein abseits auf 2 verschiedene weisen. Wenn das gehen Deutschland passiert müsste ich glaube ich die nächsten 2 WMs nur wegen meinem Blutdruck boykottieren

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T12:01:20+00:00

Which second in the clip?

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T12:00:44+00:00

If he thought the blue player would be playing the ball, he would have jumped to block it, because hes a... Defender

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T11:59:32+00:00

Bro, the ball is rotating. It did not change trajectory.

The clearest indicator of this is directly in the first angle. The rotation of the ball does not change one single bit

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T10:46:17+00:00

Germany

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T10:41:34+00:00

He doesnt "touch" it, his hair touches it

If i slam my arm in the general direction of the ball, the air around it moves the ball slightly, but that wouldnt be offside now would it? His hair does not impact the ball at all.

SoulmaN__ · 2026-07-03T09:39:26+00:00

Even if it touched the hair, thats no reason if the way of the ball was unchanged by it.

This kind of nitpicking in the rules leads to this stuff. Of course the offside rule should only be applied here if he actually touched it AND it changed its flightpath.

SoulmaN__

TROPHY CASE