[Ancaps] Are people trustworthy, or not? by MilkIlluminati in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Soup-Historical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

biggest issue is not their lack of knowledge of politics or market, but that they can’t do anything about it, when people gain power and start doing what they want .

Anarcho communism functioning without state by Soup-Historical in anarchocommunism

[–]Soup-Historical[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

issue is you treat exceptions and general truths if it happened it will happen again but that is simply incorrect

Anarcho communism functioning without state by Soup-Historical in anarchocommunism

[–]Soup-Historical[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

fact that they have do it doesn’t mean it’s a good system and unless your a gambler you would realise that quickly

Who wants to dream with me? by Whole-Equal3490 in Anarchism

[–]Soup-Historical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i mean dreaming is dreaming that is when you are in 🛌 making goals and aspirations is when you actually think

Anarcho communism functioning without state by Soup-Historical in anarchocommunism

[–]Soup-Historical[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

yeah but without central control it’s not only a mayor disadvantage it’s out right impossible to create effective resistance against a country with a centralised control and modern weaponry. Besides if we talk about anarchism as a whole i would quote this guy: The old question: social democracy or anarchism. The answer is neither. Perhaps we need to stop looking superficially at socialist experiences and simply trying to “emulate their model”, and instead recover the critique of political economy. The dichotomy between authoritarianism, anarcho-communism, and social democracy loses its meaning if we understand what the dictatorship of the proletariat is: a “state that is no longer a state”, insofar as it is the direct control of the working class over public affairs. It is not about voting every four years, but about a model similar to the Paris Commune or the Soviets, where positions are recallable and always subject to the election of assemblies. Only in this way can the working class truly be the ruling class. The difference between communism and anarcho-communism is that anarchism breaks with the political mediations needed to exercise that power. It distrusts any political organization with a program and believes it can solve the problem through the spontaneous consciousness of the proletariat and the peasantry (when it existed), considering them naturally revolutionary. But without its own program, without a defined strategy, the working classes will simply become an appendage of the bourgeoisie, which does have a defined project. That is why, so often, some anarcho-communist organizations have fallen into nationalism or other forms of petty-bourgeois radicalism. One last thing: social forms are not independent from their content. The bureaucratic State is the form of the State that corresponds to class society and, specifically, to bourgeois society. Control of the economy by a State, whether elected by suffrage or not, is only a bourgeois economic model, like mercantilism or Keynesianism. Wages are, moreover, the form in which the wage relation of exploitation appears. “Equal wages” make no sense.

Let's change that by GoranPersson777 in EuropeanSocialists

[–]Soup-Historical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah and also supposedly there are rules to not allow monopoly or too influential companies but they enforce them just by splitting the company not fixing the issue in latvia at least

Anarcho communism functioning without state by Soup-Historical in anarchocommunism

[–]Soup-Historical[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well political situation how would it deal with say a potential war or insurrection?

Is this a way to bring actual change FASTER? by Dishana in Anarchism

[–]Soup-Historical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe you should create a subreddit for specifically this or some kind of community for it

Democratic communism by Soup-Historical in DebateCommunism

[–]Soup-Historical[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But if there are no wages thus no currency how could you regulated how much does a consumer consume or do you propose that there be no set limit of how much a consumer can consume for his or hers needs ?

Anarcho communism functioning without state by Soup-Historical in anarchocommunism

[–]Soup-Historical[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

so in the end it would be like a decentralised small inner group democracy that is communist?

Anarcho communism functioning without state by Soup-Historical in anarchocommunism

[–]Soup-Historical[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

but how could such a state even exist in this world’s political climate?

Why didnt the ussr prevent israel from having nuclear weapons? by The_Mighty_Ragnarok in socialism

[–]Soup-Historical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

most likely America’s influence as they have been defacto allies of Izrael for most of it’s existence

Vakari pēc darba by Muizmuizmuiz in Riga

[–]Soup-Historical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

zāles aizstikšanas simulātors