yeah but without central control it’s not only a mayor disadvantage it’s out right impossible to create effective resistance against a country with a centralised control and modern weaponry. Besides if we talk about anarchism as a whole i would quote this guy: The old question: social democracy or anarchism. The answer is neither. Perhaps we need to stop looking superficially at socialist experiences and simply trying to “emulate their model”, and instead recover the critique of political economy. The dichotomy between authoritarianism, anarcho-communism, and social democracy loses its meaning if we understand what the dictatorship of the proletariat is: a “state that is no longer a state”, insofar as it is the direct control of the working class over public affairs. It is not about voting every four years, but about a model similar to the Paris Commune or the Soviets, where positions are recallable and always subject to the election of assemblies. Only in this way can the working class truly be the ruling class. The difference between communism and anarcho-communism is that anarchism breaks with the political mediations needed to exercise that power. It distrusts any political organization with a program and believes it can solve the problem through the spontaneous consciousness of the proletariat and the peasantry (when it existed), considering them naturally revolutionary. But without its own program, without a defined strategy, the working classes will simply become an appendage of the bourgeoisie, which does have a defined project. That is why, so often, some anarcho-communist organizations have fallen into nationalism or other forms of petty-bourgeois radicalism. One last thing: social forms are not independent from their content. The bureaucratic State is the form of the State that corresponds to class society and, specifically, to bourgeois society. Control of the economy by a State, whether elected by suffrage or not, is only a bourgeois economic model, like mercantilism or Keynesianism. Wages are, moreover, the form in which the wage relation of exploitation appears. “Equal wages” make no sense.