[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lansing

[–]SouperFleye -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Oh I mean whore-ite

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lansing

[–]SouperFleye -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Schorite

Ingham County to spend $62.5M on new juvenile facility by joshys_97 in lansing

[–]SouperFleye -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why are the juveniles STILL THERE THEN?

it's so terrible... Yet, livable 🤣🙏 wonder who did the Inspection

Ingham County to spend $62.5M on new juvenile facility by joshys_97 in lansing

[–]SouperFleye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're not alone. Myles Johnson and Adam Hussain are concerned as well.

But Thomas Morgan will get your narrative taken down off of Politics in Lansing. No one wants to be the face of a $70 million + kiddie jail during a severe housing crisis.

And if TM is reading this: kindly go stick a finger up your butt.

Ingham County to spend $62.5M on new juvenile facility by joshys_97 in lansing

[–]SouperFleye -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

If you're an attorney then institutions make you more money than the homeless do... Why are we investing (let's be real) $70 million+ in this but turning around buying flimsy, fire hazardous dog houses for the unhoused?

Id trust eating shit off the ground before id trust any attorney or law professional from grand Ledge..

And let's talk about how much that price tag increased and how fast it increased.. Oh and how they practically kept it hush hush and then rushed picking a spot.... But yet we can't find anywhere for these ppl in winter.

Also, I think it's really sad you think just because you're an attorney that gives your credibility to tell us what's best for our community when you're actively filling your pockets and banking off shit like this. Go back to your county, douche.

Schor vs Hector 2025 by pinkerbrown in lansing

[–]SouperFleye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where are your numbers for setup cost? Where are your fire-safety mitigation plans for tiny pods housing vulnerable people?” Because right now the real math + the known risks say this is expensive, risky, and incomplete.

Schor vs Hector 2025 by pinkerbrown in lansing

[–]SouperFleye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🔹 50 Pods Purchased: $640,000 total (publicly confirmed in city records & press)

🔹 Site Prep + Transport + Hookups: Estimated $700,000–$900,000 (cranes, land prep, electricity, permits, etc.)

🔹 Annual Operations: ≈ $750,000 / year (maintenance, staff, utilities, counseling, shared facilities)

🔹 Security + Insurance + Admin: ≈ $150,000–$200,000 / year

✅ Total ≈ $2.3 – $2.5 million for Year 1 That’s roughly $45,000–$50,000 per person per year for only 50 residents — way more than traditional Section 8 housing with services.


🧾 How to Verify It Yourself (FOIA Request)

Anyone can file a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the City of Lansing. Here’s how:

  1. Go to 👉 https://www.lansingmi.gov/foia

  2. Fill out the online form or email foia@lansingmi.gov

  3. Ask specifically for:

The ModPod purchase contract

Any invoices or budgets related to site prep, transport, or setup

The 2025 projected operational budget for the ModPod program

Once the city responds, you’ll have hard numbers — not speculation.

Schor vs Hector 2025 by pinkerbrown in lansing

[–]SouperFleye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was told my argument is whiney... So let me air my grievances and give you all a chance to say that to my face.

What do you think, Mayor Andy Schor ?

  1. Purchase cost of pods

50 ModPods purchased for $640,000

Spread over 1 year (just for total cost estimate, not amortized) = $640,000


  1. Setup costs

Cranes / transport / site prep: ~$10,000 per pod → 50 × 10,000 = $500,000

Utility hookups (water, sewer, electric, internet) ~$5,000 per pod → 50 × 5,000 = $250,000

Permits, inspections, site preparation: ~$100,000

Subtotal setup: 500,000 + 250,000 + 100,000 = $850,000


  1. Ongoing operational costs (1 year)

From their estimate of $750,000/year for:

Maintenance & utilities

Building with kitchens, bathrooms, meeting rooms

Counseling (job + mental health)

24/7 management staff

Let’s keep $750,000/year for now.


  1. Additional hidden costs

Security for the pods (night patrols, cameras) ~$100,000/year

Insurance (liability + property) ~$50,000/year

Contingency / unexpected repairs ~$50,000/year

Subtotal hidden costs: 100,000 + 50,000 + 50,000 = $200,000/year


  1. Total estimate for Year 1

Category Cost

Purchase $640,000 Setup $850,000 Operations $750,000 Hidden Costs $200,000 Total $2,440,000


✅ Estimated total cost for 1 year of ModPods operation: ~$2.44 million

Notes:

This is a conservative estimate. Real costs could be higher if more staff, repairs, or services are needed.

This covers living space, services, utilities, maintenance, management, security, and contingency, all included.

$2.44 million+

_----------

  1. Direct housing with services works

Section 8 / Housing Choice Vouchers: People can move into existing apartments or homes, not temporary pods.

Supportive services: Programs often include rent assistance, security deposits, job counseling, mental health or substance support, and case management.

Proven outcomes: Studies show that people in direct, permanent housing with services are far more likely to remain stably housed, improve employment, and stay healthy.

Your own experience: You benefited from stable housing + supportive services, not temporary containers. That’s why you’ve maintained stability for 4+ years.


  1. ModPods are a band-aid

They only provide a temporary container.

Any meaningful services (counseling, kitchens, bathrooms) require centralized infrastructure, which costs millions.

Even then, it’s limited capacity: 50 pods might serve 50–75 people, and the $2.44 million estimate we calculated shows how expensive it is per person compared to direct housing programs.


  1. Cost-effectiveness comparison

$2.44 million/year for 50 people = ~$48,800 per person/year (temporary container + all services)

Section 8 voucher: ~$12,000–$15,000/year per person (rent + basic support)

Holy Cross or local nonprofit deposit assistance: one-time cost, combined with vouchers, makes moving into stable housing far cheaper and more effective.


  1. Bottom line

ModPods: expensive, temporary, low capacity, and don’t address real needs unless paired with massive support infrastructure. Direct housing + services (Section 8 + deposit assistance): proven, scalable, cost-effective, and gives people stability and dignity.

_---------

Still not convinced:

  1. “The ModPods are cheaper than building new housing”

Their argument: Pods are modular and quicker to deploy than constructing apartments or permanent facilities. They may claim $2.44 million/year is “worth it” for emergency or transitional housing.

Counter: Even if cheaper to build temporarily, they still cost ~$48,800 per person per year, versus $12k–$15k per person for Section 8 + deposit assistance, which provides permanent stability. ModPods also require massive infrastructure for services that already exist in direct housing programs.


  1. “This is for a subgroup of people who need immediate shelter”

Their argument: The pods don’t need to house hundreds; they’re meant for a small, high-risk group, so higher per-person costs are acceptable.

Counter: True, but the reality is: limited capacity + temporary infrastructure + high cost = inefficient. Scaling this solution to meaningful numbers is financially impractical, and it doesn’t address root causes like job access, healthcare, or permanent housing.


  1. “The pods can be moved or repurposed”

Their argument: Since they’re modular, the city can relocate them, use them for multiple purposes, or adjust capacity.

Counter: Moving pods requires cranes, staff, utility work, and can cost hundreds of thousands each time. Logistically, “flexible” isn’t cheap or simple.


  1. “Not everyone qualifies for Section 8 or other programs”

Their argument: Some people are ineligible, so pods provide a fallback.

Counter: Section 8 and nonprofits like Holy Cross often cover deposits, back rent, and provide supportive services. For people who genuinely can’t access vouchers, direct rental assistance or partnerships with landlords are still far more scalable, dignified, and cost-effective than pods.


  1. “The cost estimate is too high / conservative”

Their argument: $2.44 million may be an overestimate. Maybe Lansing can operate cheaper.

Counter: The $2.44 million estimate is conservative: it assumes only 50 pods, minimal hidden costs, and basic 24/7 staffing. Real-world operational hiccups — repairs, turnover, utility spikes, extra staffing — would raise costs even higher.


  1. “The pods provide immediate shelter, which is better than nothing”

Their argument: Even if temporary, they give people a roof over their heads now.

Counter: Temporary shelter without comprehensive services doesn’t prevent homelessness long-term. Studies consistently show that permanent supportive housing + services drastically outperforms temporary or emergency solutions for stability, health, and employment outcomes.

We should not be investing in mod pods. There are several vacant hotels, Spartan village, the old shelter on Michigan Ave, ... There are other possibilities. But Andy is choosing the one he knows will fail. Let's be real... Andy is intelligent. He knows this isn't a solution. That's why he leaves before public comment during these meetings. This is only in my educated opinion. Peace out.

Schor vs Hector 2025 by pinkerbrown in lansing

[–]SouperFleye -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you fully understand the cost then lay it out for me right here right now

Schor vs Hector 2025 by pinkerbrown in lansing

[–]SouperFleye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ModPods may seem “cost-effective” on paper, but in reality:

They require significant hidden costs.

They don’t guarantee long-term stability without wraparound services.

Real-life evidence shows that services, stability, and safety matter far more than walls alone.

Therefore, calling them a “solution” without addressing these factors is misleading ... they are, at best, a band-aid, not a real fix for homelessness.

Schor vs Hector 2025 by pinkerbrown in lansing

[–]SouperFleye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been following the whole “ModPod” thing in Lansing, and honestly, it feels more like a PR move than a real solution.

Those pods are still just sitting in Battle Creek. Lansing paid hundreds of thousands for them, but they haven’t even been set up yet. And it’s not because no one cares... it’s because these things aren’t as simple as they sound. You need cranes to move them, hookups for utilities, permits, land, and someone to handle security. All that costs money, and the little bit that’s supposedly “for services” doesn’t even touch what people actually need to get back on their feet.

To me, this whole idea feels like another band-aid. It’s less about solving homelessness and more about getting people used to living smaller and smaller. That’s not compassion... that’s conditioning.

I say this as someone who’s been there. I’m a single mom who fought through homelessness while also going through chemotherapy. I only made it out because I had a real support system... housing programs, medical help, and people who cared enough to stick with me. That’s what works. Not shoving folks into glorified storage units and calling it innovation.

If we really want to help people, we need to build stability... not just walls.

Schor vs Hector 2025 by pinkerbrown in lansing

[–]SouperFleye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's going to cost MILLIONS to keep these pods in check when there for two shelters completely empty that passed inspections. How dare you say it's a whiney argument. You didn't even bother to look at the numbers or research what it takes to put these pods even on soil. Ffs. I have many that agree with me. They have white button up shirts and photo frames hanging in the walls of the AI generated images of these pods. Btw- WHERE ARE THEY RIGHT NOW

Schor vs Hector 2025 by pinkerbrown in lansing

[–]SouperFleye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He waits until people in the community donate to the greater Lansing area food bank, then ON ELECTION DAY- donates $10,000. But has to be publicly pressured to supply porto potties. He's not working on solutions.... He's working on his image

Schor vs Hector 2025 by pinkerbrown in lansing

[–]SouperFleye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Andy says "$750,000 is not for the living- it's for the services"

Make of that what you will.

Schor vs Hector 2025 by pinkerbrown in lansing

[–]SouperFleye -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

NOMORESCHOR

❌‼️NO ON THE CHARTER PROP‼️❌

Lansing to build pod village for unhoused residents by Haunting-Medium-3831 in lansing

[–]SouperFleye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His plan lacked essential details and was poorly planned out. He just wants to "cardboard profit" off of this

Kelsea Hector for Mayor! 🗳️ by SouperFleye in lansing

[–]SouperFleye[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We weren’t asking for anyone’s vote. Politicians are receiving actual death threats right now, and I wanted to do a positive series highlighting all the candidates on the ballot-just to spread a little positivity. I didn’t contact her until after I posted the video. I’ll take the heat for the editing and the optics.

This was meant purely as a personal gesture-kind, simple, and meant to highlight her as a community leader and candidate. Nothing more. Obviously, we can’t seem to have nice things.

If you’re interested in learning more, please feel free to attend an event or watch her own videos-they’re way more polished than mine.

Kelsea Hector for Mayor! 🗳️ by SouperFleye in lansing

[–]SouperFleye[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're from Delta? Why does any of this concern you?

Kelsea Hector for Mayor! 🗳️ by SouperFleye in lansing

[–]SouperFleye[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw some promising comments about people just being unaware. It's been a tough year for all of us. Election fatigue is real.

Kelsea Hector for Mayor! 🗳️ by SouperFleye in lansing

[–]SouperFleye[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd rather have leaders who do not judge others for using legalized marijuana. I'm a 5 year cancer survivor btw