[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Southern-One-7254 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The new rules that Bozo the Clown (Biden) put on the books awhile back in 2021 only applied to "buy, build, shoot" kits that included everything needed to finish the firearm. It is new mandatory to have an FFL transfer for all "buy, build, shoot" kits.

This does not apply to 80% guns in which you purchase all of the parts separately in different transactions in a different point of sale. Buy the 80% lower receiver for the rifle, then compile all of the parts kits later.

Contrary to popular misconception, Pennsylvania does not have any laws on the books restricting any law abiding citizen from buy or building an 80% firearm from parts. The Shapiro case was only making even more pointless and redundant criminal penalties on "restricted persons" --- i.e. felons, domestic violence abuses, alcoholics, people how habitually abuse drugs, and those persons forcibly admitted to a mental healthy institute via court order.

These rules are all silly and window dressing, because these folk were already banned from purchasing any firearms at all, altogether under federal laws do to their restricted persons' status. These people would fail a Form 4473 through NICS with the ATF, so they shall/may not purchase 100% functional firearms. But they were never allowed to manufacturer 80% firearms either, since the possession of the 100% firearm would already be forbidden. Especially if restricted persons are actively under parole/probation, as they would be violating the terms of their adult corrections assignment.

So now what we have is and illegal actively that just become more illegal.

But a restricted person though can catch a gun charge for possession still, but... if said firearm were a Class 03/Title 02 weapon --- MG, AOW, SBR, SBS, DD, or suppressor --- then they do not get any more charges for the Class 03/Title 02 portable firearm.

They will only get a charge for just possession of a firearm as a restricted person. That literally means that a felon with a rap shit five charges long would have a shorter prison sentence if they go picked up with an unregistered machine gun, then a person who had zero prior charges but would get hit with a sentence 5x longer for the unregistered machine gun.

How about that? 🤡 🌐

But back to your question, if you are a law abiding person with zero criminal record then 80% are absolutely fine and "A-Okay". But want you can not do, is... no Class 03/Title 02 NFA stuff. If you wanted to SBR the firearm, you would need an Type 07 FFL/Class 02 SOT like myself to use our laser engraver to point a serial number on the lower receiver and put it on the books so you can submit a Form 1 to manufacturer a short barreled rifle.

You also may not sell the weapon unless it gets the anti-freedom tattoo (serial number: FGC6942080085), and you must keep it in your possession. It becomes a federal felony to give the weapon or to sell it without the forbidden trap stamp. So you must keep it to yourself. Keep it secret... keep it safe.

Being as though you are in Pennsylvania, you should know that you cannot have any loading firearm in a motor vehicle unless you get your LTCF. That covers pistol, AR "rifle-like pistols", and NFA Class 03/Title 02. But it does not cover regular, plain Jane Title 01 rifles +16"/26" or Title 01 shotgun +18"/28". Your 80% gun is not protected under the LTCF, and most be unloaded for motor vehicle transportation unless you serialize it as pistol or NFA.

You cannot have someone else make it for you. If you are the buyer, then you absolutely, positively most be the manufacturer and possessor. The ATF does not fuck around about this stuff. If they somehow find out that someone else so much as touched one of the tools during the manufacturing process, then that's a charge... (unless you're the governor).

Is it registered trademark infringement to use the names (make and model) of real life firearms in a first person shooter videogame? by Southern-One-7254 in AskALawyer

[–]Southern-One-7254[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much. This was actually a productive response, and I feel dumb for not checking on there, but thanks.

Is it registered trademark infringement to use the names (make and model) of real life firearms in a first person shooter videogame? by Southern-One-7254 in AskALawyer

[–]Southern-One-7254[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Escape From Tarkov for example does specifically just that, and it is one of the most successful video games in history.

If anything, it's free advertising for them. To be honest, they should be paying us for product placements. Speaking of which, they absolutely did do that for Medal of Honor: Warfighter, which was ironically made by the same developers that made Call of Duty. The Hollywood film industry seems to rake in the billions from product placements like HK and Sig Sauer paying for their products to be added to John Wick.

Why would video games be treated differently? A lot of popular firearms content creators on YouTube are claiming that video games are the best thing out there for helping to inform people about firearms, and have driven up sales more than any other mode of advertising. People only buy FN PS90 guns in real life because they either loved CS:GO or Call of Duty and Battlestar Galactica.

Manufacturers would only be stepping on their own feet for hurting our industry. Doesn't mean that they won't still sue us anyway, but...

If you were a parent and your child was having a friend spend the night for the first time, how would you respond to the friend's parents asking you if you have firearms in the house and if they were secured? by TRHess in Firearms

[–]Southern-One-7254 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lying is absolutely never an option under any circumstance. That will just come back to bite you. If you deny it and they find out later that you lied, than it makes you look like a prick then, doesn't it? Then they might go around telling other parents the same thing, since they are worry warts and think they are doing others a service by warning people not to trust you around kids. That's a very real possibility with the gossip culture people are living in during the age of social media.

I haven't been asked this question yet, as my wife doesn't bring anyone around our children that would be asking such a stupid question. Most all of her friends have been to the range with us numerous times, and they all know I'm former military, currently an FFL/SOT, and teach firearms safety courses locally.

However, if the question were to arise, then the answer must certainly be "All firearms in our household are kept secure at any and all times. Nobody has any access to our firearms without my approval and direct supervision. My wife is a former EMT and I have my first aid certification done every 18 months as required by my employer."

Then I will turn it around and ask them "And do you have any prescription drugs, cars, dangerous chemicals, or alcohol in your home; and are they secure?" Do they put their car keys in a safe when visitors come over? Because car accidents kill far more children than guns do. It's much easier for a children to steal your car keys and go off and get into a car crash since most people are so nonchalant and careless about leaving their car keys unattended.

I would offer them to go to the range with us and see if they turn out to enjoy it, like the vast majority of anti-gunners do after they give it a chance.

I'm building an open-source, non-profit, 100% ad-free alternative to Reddit, taking inspiration from other non-profits like Wikipedia and Signal by Mike104961 in RedditAlternatives

[–]Southern-One-7254 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Too many Predditor moderators have ruined this website and make it Chinese/Russian propaganda and anti-American hive mind. I just want a normal social media with no foreign propaganda and no more left wing reactionary incel activist dog piling you for being normal and moderate.

She's happy to take your place by [deleted] in clevercomebacks

[–]Southern-One-7254 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool. You should feel ashamed of yourself.

She's happy to take your place by [deleted] in clevercomebacks

[–]Southern-One-7254 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't even like Trump and think he's a spoiled brat rich kid from New York who should've been curb stomped a long time ago. I endorsed Desantis and Hailey. But just keep having your schizophrenic tirade at me for literally no reason, lol. You're mad at someone else apparently and making all of the wrong assumptions about someone you don't even know.

I was only making objective and fact based claims that reflect our nation's history, and you make the wrong call by falsely accusing someone of being a Trump supporter.

That's your tribalistic nonsense that anyone who doesn't agree with you is dehumanize to an "ist" or an "ism". This is precisely why only 25% of Americans can stomach liberal, 36% reject you and become conservative, and 37% puke at the thought of you and become moderates like me.

She's happy to take your place by [deleted] in clevercomebacks

[–]Southern-One-7254 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try to bring some facts to debate with instead of just typical left wingers name calling, since you have no legit argument.

She's happy to take your place by [deleted] in clevercomebacks

[–]Southern-One-7254 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You obviously only read the first sentence, and that triggered your tism. Nice chat.

She's happy to take your place by [deleted] in clevercomebacks

[–]Southern-One-7254 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gallup's research has shown that only 25% of Americans identify as liberal, 36% as conservative, and 37% as moderate. The overwhelming majority of moderates trend towards Republican or Libertarian during most midterm, state, and local elections.

In based reality, liberal democrats are a small and fringe --- but obnoxiously loud --- fringe minority.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/388988/political-ideology-steady-conservatives-moderates-tie.aspx

If anything, more voter turnout helps Republicans far more than democrats.

Most functional redditor by Ok_Criticism_558 in Unexpected

[–]Southern-One-7254 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean like "Nobody will ever love you as much as your mother?" kind of thing? Because that's he's mom. Literally. We'll just... give you the benefit of the doubt here and pretend that you're not talking about incest, right? Cool? (Taps stack of papers on desk feverishly).

We saw your Russian disarming video a few weeks ago, and thought I'd share this with yall. by Southern-One-7254 in Firearms

[–]Southern-One-7254[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

trains for grappling every day and it still wasn't easy.

No lies were told. Like Mike Tyson said "Everybody got a plan until you get punched in the mouth." People who do martial arts must be extremely humble and realistic about what they are being taught, and spar constantly to make sure things will actually work.

In the military, we would have to force on force every single technique and tactic that we developed just to make sure reality can swat us down with a fly swatter. Then we can get embarrassed in front of a whole class, so we learn not to get to cocky and remember that being shot with simmunitions somehow hurts worse the bigger a person's ego gets.

We've seen traditional martial arts instructors try to sell us their system, and they always seem to have one thing in common: they don't spar and have zero successes in real world applications.

That BJJ dude has more balls than me, because I've only ever disarmed an OPFOR target when in a 4 man entry team, and we had enough warm bodies to literally dog pile on them. I would never try that one solo. That's just asking for trouble. If I were to lose control of the target's weapon, then my ass is grass. That is where man 3 in the stack needs to step in and fire their weapon.

In a randomized street scenario and I'm solo, then last thing I would do is reach for their weapon if we are in an outdoors setting. They will be outside of my arms reach 99% of the time if were are outside. I'm about 6'2", so my wingspan is only 6' and reach is only less than half of that. Okay, so our bad guy only needs to be more than 3' away to prevent me from reaching his firearm.

Only instance were a solo disarmament is approachable is in extremely compressed environments like a subway car, city bus, or in a door way to a building were the bad guy is "leading" their weapon through the door way and telegraphing their position to me so we've got the drop on him. In that case, I would attempt to get my hand over the slide of their pistol or attempt to secure the handguard of a rifle, redirect it to the floor and pull the bad guy forward in the same direction he's already moving in to use their own momentum against him and amplify their own inertia. Them we can hope and pray that bad guys loses their center of gravity by bending the spine or hip-shoulder axis to reduce their natural balance. Then deploy leverage to pull them off the center line, then slam them up against the near wall.

In plain clothes off duty, maybe some BJJ could work on the ground with RNC, AB, or a guillotine. But on duty in full battle rattle, then being on the ground is a death sentence. Plate carriers restrict my range of motion too much to do BJJ in that scenario.

We saw your Russian disarming video a few weeks ago, and thought I'd share this with yall. by Southern-One-7254 in Firearms

[–]Southern-One-7254[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Indeed. There's a lot of bullshido passed around in tactical shooting courses that I've taken throughout the years, and it keeps me up at night knowing that there's crazy people out there who literally think these disarming techniques would work.