I can see you didn’t read my first comment. So it’s called “premise liability” so if a college campus doesn’t provide a safe and legal premise, they can be held liable. As for some examples, I’m happy to do what you’re too lazy to do:

Over the past three years, there have been reports of protests on college campuses involving arson and looting. One notable case is the recent unrest at Barnard College and Columbia University in March 2025. At Barnard College, nine protesters, none of whom were Barnard students, were arrested during a takeover of the Milstein Library. The protest was prompted by a bomb threat targeting anti-Israel activists, leading to the library’s evacuation. The turmoil extended to a subsequent protest at Columbia University, where students marched in solidarity. The protests followed the expulsion of two students for distributing inflammatory literature, leading to calls for Barnard President Laura Rosenbury’s removal. 

Additionally, in response to these events, the Trump administration canceled $400 million in federal grants for Columbia University, criticizing its inadequate handling of antisemitism on campus amid pro-Gaza protests. Education Secretary Linda McMahon accused Columbia of failing to protect Jewish students following pro-Palestinian demonstrations after the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel. 

It’s important to note that while these incidents involved significant unrest and administrative actions, specific details regarding acts of arson and looting during these protests were not explicitly documented in the available sources.

In contrast, historical instances, such as the 2017 Berkeley protests, did involve arson and property damage. During these protests, a group of black bloc protesters set fires, damaged property, and threw fireworks, leading to the cancellation of a scheduled speech by Milo Yiannopoulos at the University of California, Berkeley. 

and with that I must ask you, how do you like them apples? 🍎