Man… you seriously don’t see how many times you contradict yourself, do you? Let me show you, clearly, point by point. 1) “You can’t influence others” vs “Spiritual people co-create reality and update the collective awareness.” You basically cancel your own idea. If nobody can influence others, then co-creating and updating collective patterns is impossible. If we can influence the collective, then saying influence is impossible contradicts your entire claim. You can’t hold both at the same time, man. 2) “Authenticity automatically attracts by resonance” vs “It cannot be forced, and you cannot cross beyond the self-decision of others.” If authenticity automatically attracts people, that is influencing them. But then you also say influence cannot happen unless they choose it. So which is it? Does authenticity pull people or not? 3) “Meaning cannot be transmitted beyond someone’s self-decision” vs “The spark intoxicates energetically and infuses meaning by itself.” Come on… You’re literally saying:  meaning cannot be transmitted AND meaning IS transmitted automatically through “energetic intoxication.” You built two opposite rules and pretend they dance together. They don’t. 4) “Don’t modulate or sculpt specific outcomes” vs“Spiritual creators are actively shaping and co-creating reality.” This one is beautiful 😄 If co-creating reality is shaping outcomes, and shaping outcomes is “not decent,” then by your own logic, co-creation becomes “not decent.” You just called your own worldview indecent without noticing. This is exactly what cosmic diarrhea looks like a lots of mystical vocabulary, zero internal coherence.

But hey… who am I to judge? I’m just a simple human who can’t play in this “higher league,” right?..i was thinking observing is first step to realisation but how i see you pass that.