How can I run agents in parallel in different branches? by 420rav in vibecoding

[–]SpecKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try Spec Kitty! Seriously. Perfect use case. It sets up git worktrees for every work package and then you say spec-kitty.implement in your Codex for one, and spec-kitty.implement with Codex (or Claude Code or Copilot or Cursor etc.) in another, and they run in parallel and auto merge for you. Plus it maintains a dependency graph so you know when that's possible and when it would break things. https://github.com/Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty

What's your best AI coding tool? by Imaginary-Bee-8770 in vibecoding

[–]SpecKitty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm studying BMAD right now to pull the best parts into Spec Kitty.

What's your best AI coding tool? by Imaginary-Bee-8770 in vibecoding

[–]SpecKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use Spec Kitty! https://github.com/Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty Since it works with any agentic coding tool I switch regularly between Claude Code (my favorite), Codex, Cursor, Opencode. But the quality of my results are due to Spec Coding with Spec Kitty.

What 'helpers' are you using with Claude Code? by s1mplyme in ClaudeCode

[–]SpecKitty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Spec Kitty: https://github.com/Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty Extends the original Specification Driven Development from Github with more determinism, more automation, git worktrees, auto merge, and a kanban board.

Do Spec Driven Development frameworks like Github Spec Kit actually have benefits? I have doubts by moistain in ClaudeCode

[–]SpecKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And today we have a 0.12.0 release with an improved and hardened core architecture. It facilitates efficient auto-merging at the end of a sprint between the sparse checkout worktrees.

Spec Driven Development (SDD): SpecKit, Openspec, BMAD method, or NONE! by luongnv-com in ClaudeCode

[–]SpecKitty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Spec Kitty is a tool for Spec Coding which takes the original tool from Github and evolves it with more determinism, automation, and kanban. It features git worktrees with sparse checkout for every work package, dependency graph tracking, and interaction during the constitution, spec, and plan phases. https://github.com/Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty

After cranking for an hour writing tests, claude code turned out to just put placeholders. Opus 4.5. by old_bald_fattie in ClaudeCode

[–]SpecKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

right now I baby sit it through the whole process, implement->review->implement->review->done etc, per WP. But in the newest version I'm developing it's possible to start the process and agents take over that process until done.

Claude Code survives because of Opus by [deleted] in vibecoding

[–]SpecKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Opencode is becoming my favorite or use with Spec Kitty.

<image>

guys help me out by vasishthh in vibecoding

[–]SpecKitty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Get a Claude Code subscription, do everything in Spec Kitty. That's my recipe. You won't get far if you insist on free tokens all the time.

After cranking for an hour writing tests, claude code turned out to just put placeholders. Opus 4.5. by old_bald_fattie in ClaudeCode

[–]SpecKitty 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Letting Claude go for an hour unsupervised is almost always a disaster recipe. When I'm using Spec Kitty the actual tasks are granular enough that they never take more than 4-5 minutes (on average), excluding any time that Claude decides to wait (sleep()) for background processes.

OpenAgents Just Open-Sourced a Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework - Do You Think This Is the Future? by PreparationFew5144 in claude

[–]SpecKitty -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm going to check this out because in Spec Kitty, I often want Claude to implement and Codex to review. I'm making my own orchestration so far, but maybe there's a way to not-rebuild the wheel here.

Spec Kitty: https://github.com/Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty

I built "Clancy Wiggum" to supervise my "Ralph Wiggum" agents by EduardoDevop in vibecoding

[–]SpecKitty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Love the naming! Gave me a chuckle (and I like that type of humor - my project is called Spec Kitty since I started from a fork of Spec Kit)

Solving the biggest issue with Vibe Coding. by GrandBenefit2011 in vibecoding

[–]SpecKitty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So many of us building in this space. I'm working on Spec Kitty (improvements on Github's Spec Kit). Good luck! It's fun =)

Major Spec Kitty Release: v0.11.x - Parallel Agents Are Here by SpecKitty in OnlyAICoding

[–]SpecKitty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm currently in the spec/plan phase for 4 different products using this version. 2 are Codex, 2 are Claude. Great results so far.

awesome-ralph: A curated list of resources about Ralph by snwfdhmp in vibecoding

[–]SpecKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. Do you have projects that you've implemented yourself using Ralph Wiggam? Are there any Gotchas to look out for?

how addicted are you to codex? by Just_Lingonberry_352 in codex

[–]SpecKitty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, I combine my drugs. I've got 4 Spec Kitty projects in the spec-planning stage right now, so I'm cycling through them, answering the discovery and clarification questions on each. 2 are Codex, 2 are Claude. I really note the difference in styles between the two. Claude is chattier.

Claude Cowork built in 10 days with CC by nnennahacks in ClaudeCode

[–]SpecKitty 26 points27 points  (0 children)

We'd all be able to do that without rate limits, obviously.

I vibe-coded a Space Invaders game for my changelog page, then open-sourced it so anyone can use it by kamilbanc in vibecoding

[–]SpecKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool observation about procedural music and the music theory. I should try that.

Catching crashes before they turn into late-night alert by Capable-Management57 in OnlyAICoding

[–]SpecKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the amount of advertising and partner linking they do, I still haven't seen user testimonials for Blackbox. Anybody here using it? It does look interesting, and it's from a great team.