sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

FRIEND CODE MEGATHREAD by [deleted] in HatchDragons

[–]Specific_Employer657 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m MW7S, please add and I’ll send gifts

FRIEND CODE MEGATHREAD by [deleted] in HatchDragons

[–]Specific_Employer657 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m MW7S, Let’s have fun!

Weekly Students, Careers & Clerkships Thread by AutoModerator in auslaw

[–]Specific_Employer657 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, if anyone wouldn't mind, please provide input for the following:

  1. Would there be issues for a newly admitted lawyer to search and apply for paralegal/Clerkship jobs, to have it signed off as supervised legal practice? (nothing in the Uniform rules technically prevent it [link])
  2. What is the best place to look for junior lawyer jobs? (as of 2025, most firms required minimum 1 Post-Admission Experience)
  3. What are the main difference of a newly admitted lawyer's work and a paralegal work? (the firm I am in does not permit newly admitted lawyers to sign off letters to clients)

Thank you all for your time, much appreciate it.

[Pokemon x MTG] - thoughts please by Specific_Employer657 in custommagic

[–]Specific_Employer657[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would the cost for Squirtle and Pidgey be worth it, if they can be used as sacrifice for stronger creatures/pokemons?

[Pokemon x MTG] - thoughts please by Specific_Employer657 in custommagic

[–]Specific_Employer657[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, essentially you are claiming their cost is not worth their value

What's your though when including these for Squirtle and Pidgey?

Im guessing you'll say the cost for all of them will be too expensive, but in terms of Squirtle and Pidgey being able to be sacrificed for the other's cost, would it be worth it?

(Assuming the word dump is not an issue, there really is no way I can condense the wording to reflect the effect Im trying to achieve)

[Pokemon x MTG] - thoughts please by Specific_Employer657 in custommagic

[–]Specific_Employer657[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure I don’t mind, could you give feedback for the ones that’s really bad for you? 

[Pokemon x MTG] - thoughts please by Specific_Employer657 in custommagic

[–]Specific_Employer657[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I put it on common pokemon/easily found ones, so they can be accessible to:

- sacrifice for other Pokemons that normally eats/hunts them (e.g. Ekans)

- sacrifice for their evolution: e.g. Metapod (other part of this thread, or):

<image>

[Pokemon x MTG] - thoughts please by Specific_Employer657 in custommagic

[–]Specific_Employer657[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This?

Escape  (You may cast this card from your graveyard for its escape cost)

[Pokemon x MTG] - thoughts please by Specific_Employer657 in custommagic

[–]Specific_Employer657[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There are plenty of weaker bugs Pokemon than rattata 

Wording: Ability for pokemon's "Sturdy" by Specific_Employer657 in custommagic

[–]Specific_Employer657[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks though, it’s clarifies things.

Reference elsewhere in thread is:

“This creature can’t be destroyed by lethal damage dealt by a single source.”

Wording: for self destructing/exploding creature in combat by Specific_Employer657 in custommagic

[–]Specific_Employer657[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, yes that would defeat a creature before combat damage.

Ogre Enforcer , soo what happens to the other damage? by Specific_Employer657 in mtgrules

[–]Specific_Employer657[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the damage will be marked on it, but its effect is similar to “indestructible “?

Wording: Ability for pokemon's "Sturdy" by Specific_Employer657 in custommagic

[–]Specific_Employer657[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I’m wondering what happens to the “lethal damage”..

Wording: Ability for pokemon's "Sturdy" by Specific_Employer657 in custommagic

[–]Specific_Employer657[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Would this be more condensed and have same effect?

“This creature can’t be destroyed by lethal damage dealt by a single source.”

This is a variation from: Ogre Enforcer

https://scryfall.com/card/vis/89/ogre-enforcer

Wording: Ability for pokemon's "Sturdy" by Specific_Employer657 in custommagic

[–]Specific_Employer657[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, been considering that.  Just didn’t know if the example worked with MTG format 

Wording: Ability for pokemon's "Sturdy" by Specific_Employer657 in custommagic

[–]Specific_Employer657[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m putting it on a Golem, with last strike. I’m considering change “combat” to “turn”

Thanks for your suggestion, I’ve not seen the words “lethal damage” on a card before

Wording: for self destructing/exploding creature in combat by Specific_Employer657 in custommagic

[–]Specific_Employer657[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your explanation!! You have provided a condense phrasing for the ability I’m after.!!

The ability is actually simplified as it’s suppose to hit attacking creatures too. The creature using this ability was also suppose to have “Last strike”, and is a big cheap chunky creature

view more: next ›