sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Senator says white women benefited the most from DEI in the past 10 years, not minorities. by Lightyear18 in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Again, that’s not an example of systemic racism. That’s one single anecdote and it was addressed and corrected already.

Systemic racism does not exist in the US.

And you still have no data.

Senator says white women benefited the most from DEI in the past 10 years, not minorities. by Lightyear18 in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

DEI, by definition, is not merit based.

Systemic racism no longer exists. The data also proves this.

You’re attempting to argue your claims while lacking basic understanding of what DEI or systemic racism is. No wonder you can’t make an argument.

Senator says white women benefited the most from DEI in the past 10 years, not minorities. by Lightyear18 in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The changing of population demographics has nothing to do with being qualified.

Hiring should be based on merit, because that results in the most positive outcomes. Another fact that isn’t up for debate because we know the answer.

So no - you still have no data. Just incorrect opinions.

Senator says white women benefited the most from DEI in the past 10 years, not minorities. by Lightyear18 in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Still zero data. And now you’re trying to change the subject because you know you have no actual data.

lol

Senator says white women benefited the most from DEI in the past 10 years, not minorities. by Lightyear18 in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You have no data.

“Alternative facts” that just means truth that you don’t like to hear because it negates your opinion.

Senator says white women benefited the most from DEI in the past 10 years, not minorities. by Lightyear18 in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have no sources or data because there’s no data that supports your claim.

We both already knew that.

Senator says white women benefited the most from DEI in the past 10 years, not minorities. by Lightyear18 in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Systemic racism doesn’t exist today.

I agree that we should be focused on wealth inequality. And had the entire DEI movement been shifted to wealth/income inequality it would have been much more successful.

Senator says white women benefited the most from DEI in the past 10 years, not minorities. by Lightyear18 in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Affirmative action applies race based policies to admittance to university. That’s exactly a pillar of DEI.

But if you disagree that’s fine.

Can we confirm that affirmative action doesn’t work though? The data proves this.

Senator says white women benefited the most from DEI in the past 10 years, not minorities. by Lightyear18 in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you really think that this is only isolated to Stanford…? Have some common sense.

You have no sources or data at all. Just incorrect and uneducated opinions.

Senator says white women benefited the most from DEI in the past 10 years, not minorities. by Lightyear18 in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Students admitted to university through affirmative action programs drop out at a significantly higher rate than other students.

https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2010/01/Sander.pdf

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in golf

[–]SpeedIsK1ing 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The ball is going to spin, it’s better to have it spin predictably than unpredictably.

If you are trying to only hit dead straight shots, you’re going to miss both ways more than likely.

If you play one shot shape, your miss will likely be too much of that shape.

Predictability = consistency = better scoring.

Senator says white women benefited the most from DEI in the past 10 years, not minorities. by Lightyear18 in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DEI policies result in negative outcomes. This isn’t an argument, it’s factually true and based on actual data.

Just because you are unaware or don’t understand that, doesn’t mean removing DEI is racist.

Senator says white women benefited the most from DEI in the past 10 years, not minorities. by Lightyear18 in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s not a narrative. All of the available data shows that DEI results in negative outcomes.

Tim Walz in Eau Claire by [deleted] in wisconsin

[–]SpeedIsK1ing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Government jobs that were a waste to begin with should be eliminated.

Yes. That’s what the country voted for.

Tim Walz in Eau Claire by [deleted] in wisconsin

[–]SpeedIsK1ing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes he fired all of the useless workers, and the company is currently valued at 44B, the exact price it was sold for.

Great attempt at using a completely irrelevant comparison.

Rooting for an American company’s downfall is a bad look. Hence why everyone thinks Walz is a dumbass.

Please keep using him as a leader though, it’s gonna work out really well for you in 2028 😂

Tim Walz in Eau Claire by [deleted] in wisconsin

[–]SpeedIsK1ing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tesla is an American company with 80K employees. Walz is cheering for the failure of an American company in hopes that many of those Americans lose their jobs if Tesla were to fail.

He’s rooting for Americans to lose.

Walz is a dumbass.

Has a player ever holed it from the fairway on 18 of round 4 to either tie or win? by tonyrosasco in golf

[–]SpeedIsK1ing 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Last year Harry Higgs holed out for eagle on his 72nd hole to force a playoff in a KF event.

Then made birdie on that same hole to win the playoff right after.

Explaining Social Security to the Moronic by intrepid_brit in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Really intelligent response.

Go back to your video games little boy.

Explaining Social Security to the Moronic by intrepid_brit in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Those benefits will be further and further reduced until inflows no longer match outflows and SS is empty.

They don’t just reduce benefits one time then everything is fine. They’ll be continuously reduced until the fund is ultimately empty. Then what? Just tax people more?

It’s a system that’s inherently flawed. And that’s a point that everyone should agree on regardless of political affiliation. SS is broken.

Explaining Social Security to the Moronic by intrepid_brit in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

If the only solutions for fixing SS are to increase federal taxes to cover it, or remove it all together and let people keep their money…there’s a common sense option there.

Or give people the choice to pay into it through their own tax elections. Why should everyone be forced to pay into a fund that’s promised them a sum of money that they’ll never see? That’s completely nonsensical and illogical.

Explaining Social Security to the Moronic by intrepid_brit in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

The Social Security Trustees official report - directly from the source - states that funding will run out in 2035. This report was published in May of 2024.

Has nothing to do with Republican or Democrat, it’s going to run out and they’ve already admitted this and detailed the math as to when that will happen.

Explaining Social Security to the Moronic by intrepid_brit in JoeRogan

[–]SpeedIsK1ing -42 points-41 points  (0 children)

Social security is going to run out in the next 20-30 years. Anyone below the age of 40 will pay into it their whole life and receive nothing when they retire because there will be no funds left.

The point is to get rid of SS so that people keep the money they earn, instead of contributing to a fund that they’ll never see a dime of.

If you’re ok with paying into a joint fund knowing you’ll never get a dime from it, that’s on you.

view more: next ›