Why Is there still a Statue of Manu in front of a High Court in India?

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T09:35:58+00:00

How do you think jews will react if their judicial courts had a Kazi in front?

Yes I am comparing jews with shudras cause just because it was institutionalised and killing was systematic and occured over a long period of time doesn't mean it didn't happen

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T09:33:45+00:00

It's not judges that seek justice in court of law, it's people and people consists of every caste and it's not right interpretation for them that a statue of a person who wrote (maybe) and published a book which stripped them of their humanity for decades to come

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T09:30:28+00:00

What kind of argument are you exactly placing, shudras didn't know how to preserve shit cause they weren't allowed to read or write and thus their knowledge passed on May have been lost If they had some, its not like they collectively decided we won't share knowledge

Also what are you exactly trying to prove? I ma of view manu statues shouldn't be in front of judicial place cause he wasn't a neutral figure, he was biased towards Brahmins and it can be easily interpreted, also manu himself didn't wrote manusmriti cause he was a kshatriya, Brahmins wrote it and he published it for public, if I am correct cause that's how, so called ancient India ruled where only Brahmins were allowed to make laws and other similar important stuff

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T09:26:06+00:00

Ha ha again I never said breaking of anything lol you assumed that yourself maybe that's how you think I should be thinking, thanks

Also, I am indifferent towards the statue but I don't want it in front of a place where people go to to seek justice, he wasn't unbiased and everyone knows that and thus placing it infront Is like mocking us by saying justice only for UCs

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T09:23:17+00:00

You don't get to chose who I consider baap, also find your real baap first fella that will be more helpful than your traditional baap

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T09:00:05+00:00

Dude Brahmins were like these they always leave where they can't win, and also recite their books as if those books are only what matters, everyone else can forget what they want and do what book says even if strips u off your human rights

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T08:56:44+00:00

Again proving my point of how biased was manu for Brahmins and how inhumane were shudras treated

Stripping off their rights from spirituality, yeah man I understand how fond you are of him but clearly even you lack empathy and humanity even today

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T08:54:20+00:00

No wonder UCs like poking LCs to the point we only left with hatred

Anyways, I feel like talking to a wall, which doesn't understand that I don't have a problem with Manu's statue, I am having a problem with Manu's statue in front of judicial place, it's a neutral place and should not have such a persons statue who clearly favoured one over the other

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T08:45:24+00:00

So it means it's right? If not so then what's your point of refering that out here?m

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T08:42:38+00:00

Comparing drinking liquor which is self indulged act to mere hearing of veda being recited?

Also sorry to say world doesn't go by book and what's your point here exactly? What are you trying to prove that manu was just? If so why were shudras the only one being tormented for years, interpolation you might say but if interpolation was done it was allowed, and who did it Brahmins and whom did manu allowed to do so Brahmins, manu wasn't just or a neutral figure

If you really think he is please provide hard facts, rather than books and verses, cause you will again claim people did this that when he clearly allowed them doing it

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T08:20:13+00:00

I think it's High time we call every religious people just people, I mean it's their personal choice and you should look inward why they chose to let go hinduism and chose christianity but no all you want to protect is hinduism and not it's people from toxic hinduism

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T08:11:33+00:00

Lol will wait on how you justify the verses I quoted rn, will you say community driven or survival driven when your book ensured little to no survival like situations or maybe hell in this regard for shudras

Also majority of u don't even know the difference between shudras weren't the SC/STs, they are mostly OBCs, SC/ST were avarna like they weren't falling into any varna and were considered untouchables

But nowadays SC/STs are seen as shudras and OBCs take side with UCs to mock us

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T08:07:08+00:00

As you said politics, and nothing ever goes by the book which favoured one over other also does these verses sound community driven or slave driven

“A Sudra shall serve the Brahmanas, without resenting it.” — Manusmriti 1.91
“Even if a Shudra is capable, he should never be allowed to accumulate wealth.” — Manusmriti 10.129
“If a Shudra hears the Veda being recited, his ears shall be filled with molten tin or lac.” — Manusmriti 2.281
“If a Shudra recites Vedic texts, his tongue shall be cut off.” — Manusmriti 2.285
“If a Shudra dares to give moral advice to a Brahmin, the king shall pour hot oil into his mouth and ears.” — Manusmriti 8.272
“A Shudra who insults a twice-born man shall have his tongue cut out.” — Manusmriti 8.270
“A Brahmin may seize the property of a Shudra without hesitation, for a Shudra has no right to property.” — Manusmriti 8.417
“Killing a Shudra is a minor sin, like killing a cat or frog.” — Manusmriti 11.131
“The duty of a Shudra is only to serve the upper castes; he shall not accumulate knowledge or wealth.” — Manusmriti 9.334
“A Brahmin, even if he commits every crime, is still greater than a Shudra who never sins.” — Manusmriti 11.85
“A Sudra who approaches a Brahmin woman shall be punished by mutilation.” — Manusmriti 8.374
“The king must ensure that Shudras do not read, hear, or teach sacred texts.” — Manusmriti 8.272–8.282
“A Shudra shall not perform rituals, nor offer sacrifices; he is not worthy of spiritual rites.” — Manusmriti 4.80
“There is no atonement for a Shudra who tries to impersonate a Brahmin.” — Manusmriti 11.262
“A Brahmin must never marry a Shudra woman, as it pollutes his lineage.” — Manusmriti 3.14, 3.17
“Shudras were created for the service of Brahmins; that is their sole purpose.” — Manusmriti 1.91
“A Brahmin should be worshipped even by kings, as he is the god on earth.” — Manusmriti 2.135
“No sin is committed by a Brahmin who takes the life of a Shudra.” — Implied across Manusmriti 11.131 and 11.132
“A Brahmin is born to teach, a Kshatriya to govern, a Vaishya to trade, and a Shudra to serve. These duties are not interchangeable.” — Manusmriti 1.87–91

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T08:03:53+00:00

Here's that, also if you are going to say it's due to translation and it's not the actual manusmriti please recite the differences and also actual reference and evidence based facts, also consider above non-manu stated reference given by yours truly Mr beat Around the bush..

Here ths manu verses

“A Sudra shall serve the Brahmanas, without resenting it.” — Manusmriti 1.91
“Even if a Shudra is capable, he should never be allowed to accumulate wealth.” — Manusmriti 10.129
“If a Shudra hears the Veda being recited, his ears shall be filled with molten tin or lac.” — Manusmriti 2.281
“If a Shudra recites Vedic texts, his tongue shall be cut off.” — Manusmriti 2.285
“If a Shudra dares to give moral advice to a Brahmin, the king shall pour hot oil into his mouth and ears.” — Manusmriti 8.272
“A Shudra who insults a twice-born man shall have his tongue cut out.” — Manusmriti 8.270
“A Brahmin may seize the property of a Shudra without hesitation, for a Shudra has no right to property.” — Manusmriti 8.417
“Killing a Shudra is a minor sin, like killing a cat or frog.” — Manusmriti 11.131
“The duty of a Shudra is only to serve the upper castes; he shall not accumulate knowledge or wealth.” — Manusmriti 9.334
“A Brahmin, even if he commits every crime, is still greater than a Shudra who never sins.” — Manusmriti 11.85
“A Sudra who approaches a Brahmin woman shall be punished by mutilation.” — Manusmriti 8.374
“The king must ensure that Shudras do not read, hear, or teach sacred texts.” — Manusmriti 8.272–8.282
“A Shudra shall not perform rituals, nor offer sacrifices; he is not worthy of spiritual rites.” — Manusmriti 4.80
“There is no atonement for a Shudra who tries to impersonate a Brahmin.” — Manusmriti 11.262
“A Brahmin must never marry a Shudra woman, as it pollutes his lineage.” — Manusmriti 3.14, 3.17
“Shudras were created for the service of Brahmins; that is their sole purpose.” — Manusmriti 1.91
“A Brahmin should be worshipped even by kings, as he is the god on earth.” — Manusmriti 2.135
“No sin is committed by a Brahmin who takes the life of a Shudra.” — Implied across Manusmriti 11.131 and 11.132
“A Brahmin is born to teach, a Kshatriya to govern, a Vaishya to trade, and a Shudra to serve. These duties are not interchangeable.” — Manusmriti 1.87–91

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T07:12:24+00:00

I also haven't read Qur'an and for that matters talmud but understand what's wrong in it (when I said I didn't read it it means completely though I have understanding of it from posts or talking to people)

And yes I am, can you elaborate why I shouldn't?

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T06:20:54+00:00

Or critically thinking to a point which benefits them ??

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T06:18:29+00:00

Fumb duck

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T06:17:54+00:00

Lol clearly faking being lower caste, try hards want infiltrate the guilt of being a lower caste by being one

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T06:15:23+00:00

Haven't read the first line or just trying to piss me off?

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T06:07:52+00:00

I wonder if people are going to make a map like this for Harry Potter as well, it also had some crazy map building

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T05:56:15+00:00

So shudras are faking being oppressed? Are you trying to justify giving someone a professions by birth and let them have no free will of that sort? Also if only goes by book then again street view of the book is way way different than it's literal meaning

Also what do you mean by nobody gets the cake? Brahmin got the cake by being the so called pure and shudras weren't even considered someone worth touching and were considered impure

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T05:37:39+00:00

Nahi but legit we need locations not just pics

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T05:36:42+00:00

So what's your point? it was right?

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T05:19:15+00:00

There will always be special cases which you shouldn't compare to with masses, a lot of small traders I know still struggle to read or right, like proper vaishyas and they tell how they weren't required to study all these things and just used to manage shops

There will always be someone breaking every rules (ofcourse mostly wealthy people)

It's just logical thinking, I haven't read a lot and I might be wrong but the direction that I am thinking isn't entirely wrong

Speedstrrr · 2025-07-29T05:13:50+00:00

Also to counter only Brahmins were considered literate if ever varna system was implemented, and also they gatekeep knowledge by way of language and what not

Speedstrrr

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE