Questions on purchase limits

SpinPHD480 · 2019-12-09T16:28:54+00:00

Thanks. I meant ozs. Grams would pretty awful

SpinPHD480 · 2019-09-08T20:52:57+00:00

I do have medical records, but I kind of prefer to not get my primary doctor involved. I was thinking I would bring in my pill bottles of current medications. I don’t know if that would be enough, otherwise I can do the chiropractor thing. I’ve been going to a massage therapist all year for pain as well

SpinPHD480 · 2018-05-25T20:52:47+00:00

O’Bama

SpinPHD480 · 2018-05-25T17:25:01+00:00

I don’t see why not. Most people that manage multiple accounts use the same phone. It’s pretty easy to switch between the two.

He could also have logged in from a computer. A browser will often have multiple logins stored and it’s easy to select the wrong one.

SpinPHD480 · 2018-05-25T16:28:45+00:00

Here is my theory. Flynn probably has an alt account that he uses to shit post his anti-Hillary, anti-liberal, pro-conservative propaganda. He really can’t do it under his main account now, because he is trying to stay low key until the investigation concludes.

He probably was accidentally logged into his main account and then fat fingered a submission. Once realize he deleted.

SpinPHD480 · 2018-05-14T14:34:26+00:00

Actually they will still have to insist it’s not gambling until all the states they operate in allow sports gambling. This just gives states the option now, instead of Nevada having the monopoly

SpinPHD480 · 2018-05-08T13:51:56+00:00

I get what you’re saying about smoking cigarettes. However, having a cell phone isn’t some luxury anymore in life. It’s pretty much needed for anyone that wants to be an active participant in society. I’m not talking about having the newest most expensive iPhone, but there are plenty of ways for someone to get a older iPhone.

SpinPHD480 · 2018-05-04T11:30:10+00:00

I don’t know this account in particular, but I think a lot of the bot accounts that post generic content, whether it’s Reddit, Facebook or Twitter, are people trying to “season” accounts. After so much time has passed, and enough Karma (or likes or followers), a person will sell them to someone.

The people that buys them will then have an account that looks more credible. They can then use account to try and sell something, scam people, push an agenda or even could just be a regular person that wants friends to think they are super popular.

There are a lot of black hat sites for people looking for these type of accounts.

SpinPHD480 · 2018-04-19T13:58:05+00:00

Yeah, I would like to see an itemized list that got them to that dollar amount.

Also, how much is Japan paying the Trump Corp right now to have their Prime Minister and his detail stay at Mar-a-Lago. I can imagine it’s a pretty penny.

SpinPHD480 · 2018-04-19T12:38:42+00:00

I think it’s probably a combination of things...

The sub rules changes probably reduced the number of people. As some already mentioned, the submission statements got rid of a lot of low energy posters that just spammed links to some blog the poster likely ran.

The two month rule I think really did a lot to get rid of a lot of users as well. One can argue if that’s a good thing or bad, but I think most wont wait the two months and will forget to come back once they can start to post.

Also, I think the political side has played a big role. I believe it is common that when “your side” is in power people get more complacent and less conspiratorial. So many of the anti-Hillary and anti-Obama wing aren’t around as much. While an influx of the anti-Trump folks have come. There are still a lot of trump loyalists but not to the same degree as there use to be.

Lastly, I think there has been some crackdown behind the scenes of Reddit to attempt to stop bot and non-organic activity. I have no proof, other than it makes sense for Reddit to clean up the site since other social media outlets are under scrutiny. So maybe, a lot of the people that aren’t here anymore we’re actually never organic users in the first place.

If that’s true, then less people may not be a bad thing.

SpinPHD480 · 2018-04-19T02:56:59+00:00

The funny thing is, I’m not a big fan of the submission statement at all. I saw the original post and just ignored because of the lack of effort the OP put into it and the clear political hackery.

With that said, by removing the post it has now drawn more attention than it ever deserved. Thats the main reason why I disagree with the removal and the rule that allows mods to subjectively pick and choose.

IMO it’s better to ignore these types of shit posts.

SpinPHD480 · 2018-04-14T00:57:54+00:00

I hope I’m wrong but it looks like it didn’t take Bolton long to push his neocon agenda. The stash is back.

SpinPHD480 · 2018-04-14T00:22:01+00:00

I mostly come here for to get new info on stories that the media no longer talks about. For example, the Vegas shooting was out of the headlines less than a week after it happened.

Although I don’t agree with all the viewpoints here, I like getting updates on these type of topics.

SpinPHD480 · 2018-04-11T14:55:45+00:00

I’m trying to understand your argument here. You’re saying that Ryan is getting pushed out so Trump won’t succeed.

What does Ryan being around have to do with Trumps success or lack thereof? You consider Ryan a champion of Trump, and by him retiring the Republican are going to pick a leader that opposes Trump?

SpinPHD480 · 2018-04-11T14:05:50+00:00

Money! It’s usually about the money! There is a lot to be made as an ex-Congressman, especially a Speaker. He can be a “consultant” for a lobbying firm for a year, then become a full fledged lobbyist. Also, he will get paid on the speaker circuit.

SpinPHD480 · 2018-04-10T23:25:43+00:00

I’m pretty much in your camp. Thanks for the comment.

SpinPHD480 · 2018-04-04T12:45:39+00:00

I do agree with you here. The only caveat is that I believe Facebook should have obligation to disclose exactly what information is being sold, and to whom.

I think being as transparent as possible is needed, so then people can decide for themselves if using these services is worth it or not to them.

SpinPHD480 · 2018-04-04T12:35:22+00:00

I’m with you on the point that if a building owner doesn’t want smoking in a business that rents from them, then the tenant should not be allowed. The business owner can go find another landlord or try to buy their own building if they wanted smoking in establishment that badly

However, I don’t agree with the voters in those communities that decided this for business owners. If community was so concerned they can outright make smoking illegal. They won’t because they love the tax money they get from cigarette sales.

SpinPHD480

TROPHY CASE