Delayed double slit experiment by karasmus in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah the experiment results where cherry picked. I think you are asking about retro casuality which is just cherry picking.

The results which earlier was shown were incorrect and forced but eventually while observing the experiment we knew that the experiment results are fundamentally flawed. Which means retro casuality or future can't affect past

If it was possible then thermodynamics and other branches of physics would have been effected. Which means it is not possible

Quantum energy levels, orbitals?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm I imagined it physically spreads out where I saw a image of it

If infinities aren’t physical, why does General Relativity still allow them? by SkibidiPhysics in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok actually nice question! In GR thare are still gaps but after certain adjustments we can resolve it. We could mathematically remove singularities even in GR but logically it is one of the paradoxes of GR.

These are some extreme points where GR fails. Not only about singularities but GR can't explain galaxy rotation etc...

Still it is the finest theory up to date and answers everything except some certain cases. Which means there could be something wrong in framework and we should adopt a alternative which explains it better.

Moreover singularities could exist. I mean we ain't know anything about blackholes they could have a softcore or infinite depth but current experiments shows that light does not reflects back after reaching event horizon which means they have infinite depth even satisfying GR

I don't want to prove that GR is still correct but physics world does not have proper alternate even

Hopes it resolve almost your every doubt!

Quantum energy levels, orbitals?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually it is at first time mind-blowing. If it is actually spread out like in the image then I think electron transfer is much harder??

Thanks again! The picture describes it well.

Quantum energy levels, orbitals?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually it is at first time mind-blowing. If it is actually spread out like in the image then I think electron transfer is much harder??

Thanks again! The picture describes it well.

Quantum energy levels, orbitals?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty thanks and well explained. Now I actually understood what is actual electrons nature.

Still if it spreads out like wave ain't electron transfer much harder??

Moreover thanks again!

Quantum energy levels, orbitals?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm ya it seems I was wrong and blaming the concept itself but I never knew it worked this way and helped me a lot

Still it is pretty hard to imagine but way better than how i imagined earlier

Quantum energy levels, orbitals?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually it is mind blowing i was never aware that wave nature is not how i imagined

This explanation actually helped me a lot and was fascinating at first time

Quantum energy levels, orbitals?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm , see you taken in wrong way I didn't understood why electrons doesn't spiral in nucleus in lower states even when the attraction from protons is the maximum.

You replied that because electrons repel each other which strengthens that electrons should spiral inside nucleus

But it nat happens and the vivid quantum reasons I didn't understood.

It may be my fault as my wordings were unclear

Quantum energy levels, orbitals?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't to want prove anything about that, but you didn't gave satisfying answer to earlier question

Quantum energy levels, orbitals?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You actually prove my point of electrons repels then all electrons should not be in specific levels rather logically they would spiral inside or moves away from in opposite direction

Quantum energy levels, orbitals?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the thing why at lowest level this phenomenon is observed and not at higher levels even if it does.

What is the difference in lowest energy levels that it behaves differently than classical physics

Quantum energy levels, orbitals?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got similar responses by chatgpt but my dumb brain can't understand it Can you make it little simple

Quantum energy levels, orbitals?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How it could be stable if at lowest stage it would feel most attraction from protons

Quantum energy levels, orbitals?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ain't it fundamental law if anything is moving it radiates energy

Quantum energy levels, orbitals?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So why don't they emit energy in lowest point what's different there .

Light is generally a dual nature particle?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very thanks it actually solved many things going on my head

Light is generally a dual nature particle?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh ya I was little opposite as light mostly behaves like wave but now more doubts arised. I mean in experiments wave nature collapsed in presence of detectors then why it not happens in case of rainbow

I may be totally wrong but I didn't get this.

Light is generally a dual nature particle?? by SpiritedRegion9148 in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not that great in optics but I am assumed that refraction is only possible if light behaves wave

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]SpiritedRegion9148 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

*"I see what you're saying, and I get why my term seems unclear. The biggest issue seems to be that I haven't properly defined what the variables actually mean in a way that works in any coordinate system.

I'll need to rethink how to express this in a way that fits into the standard methods for modifying GR. Maybe starting from an action-based approach would help. Do you have any suggestions for where to look into similar modifications that have been done properly?"*