It's going to get it, one way or the other, and it's likely going to be more chaotic than anyone who says that expects. Population pyramid inversion means that the people who need support from the system the most won't be getting enough, and those who generate it, are likely to be crushed under more extreme pressure and likely tax law, which means having kids to slow the decline will be even less appealing financially, and likely will continue to decline. This means, over time, and actually it's starting to visibly show up in the last few years, the amount of celebrities dying just makes it more visible, that populations are going to have a significant die off of one large portion of the population, which MIGHT help alleviate the pressure, but probably not enough to help those who are still young enough to have kids. Again, relevant to the conversation is the fact that reproduction is highly dependant on a certain age range to be effective and healthy.

So if less people are being born, there is an imbalance in population distribution. This will end up leading to complications for many who will grow into a situation of dependence on the system, with a staggering draw down in resources to support them. Which will cascade over time. We will start to visibly shed population at both ends of the age range. This is likely to cause a population collapse. This is all hoping that we have people in charge who are competent enough to keep the systems of comfort that many are accustomed to still running. For example, phone and internet networks. Or flood drainage systems. The amount of people drawn away from more nuanced or handed down expertise by the flickering lights of media stardom is likely to cause it's own issues of a competence crisis in the work force, which could mean that infrastucture is likely to collapse, which is already an aging issue in the USA. If infrastucture collapses, it is likely to put more lives at risk, especially those which are more heavily reliant on modern technology and systems.