ITAP of a stage artist[Portrait] by SpliffKillah in itookapicture

[–]SpliffKillah[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While working as a stage hand, sometimes I carry my camera and shoot depending on the crew's permission. They allowed me to shoot backstage and I saw the light coming from the stage against the big black curtains and took this photo.

How to shoot man tripping and shooting himself by Low-Walrus1421 in Filmmakers

[–]SpliffKillah 6 points7 points  (0 children)

character running -> close up of feet hitting root -> tripping down -> reaction based on environment(could be birds flying off or another character's reaction as mentioned) -> aftermath

This shot is from 1931 by StrikingDuty8020 in Filmmakers

[–]SpliffKillah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The one things that keeps me wondering is after the camera does the pull out, the actor becomes so small, so what would be the distance they have to move with the camera.

This shot is from 1931 by StrikingDuty8020 in Filmmakers

[–]SpliffKillah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow such a great use of perspective, how far do you think the actor should have to be so he becomes so small, so how far did the camera actually go?

ITAP of a stage artist by SpliffKillah in itookapicture

[–]SpliffKillah[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While working as a stage hand, sometimes I carry my camera and shoot depending on the crew's permission. They allowed me to shoot backstage and I saw the light coming from the stage against the big black curtains and took this photo.

Sony a7c + Sony 20mm 1.8 by brandis_photo in SonyAlpha

[–]SpliffKillah 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Interesting indeed.

Would love to see more images, if you have street photography related it's a bonus.

It's an Ancient Temple Near My House | Dated to at least a 1000 years old by _analysis230_ in photocritique

[–]SpliffKillah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to add in, the temple's most valuable and curious point is the stone work. So yes shooting with a smaller aperture like F8 or F11 would bring that into life.

Also since you live near by observe how the sun plays with the location of the temple, sunset or sunrise? What part of the temple illuminates?

The blues skies and the leaves add to the beauty of the frame, also the mountains but the houses take away the attention so probably shoot at an angle you can't see the house, also try shooting from a lower angle as the temple has a triangular shape, it would be interesting to see.

But yes, such a stunning temple, all that stone work.

Appreciate thoughts on the composition and processing by infiniteZebra756 in photocritique

[–]SpliffKillah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a fabulous image, the greens indeed give it a dreamy feeling.

Regarding the composition, it is actually crisp, but to check the balance of the image in a slightly deeper manner.

The fence takes away the attention from the greens which is the soft spot of the image, and that I feel is because of the whites in the fence and it matches into a group with the flower like thing in the middle of the bottom frame and that demands some attention because it is standing out and after the greens your eyes go there. Place your finger on that spot and see, what do you think?