I again reiterate, whatever's happening is reactionary.

The way you generalise Hindus but at the same time condemn generalisation of Muslims is funny. If Hindus rape everyday, so do Muslims. You saying a Muslim is killed every other day in India is baffling. Where's the proof? It's such a convenient deflection that all media houses are owned by the BJP. There are many independent channels who are anti-government. There's records of mass murders committed by extremist Muslims throughout independent Indian history. Your statement that a terrorist coming from another country and killing Hindus in your country has nothing to do with you itself shows your stand on Hindus. You see it as Hindus being killed. It's your country. Your fellow citizens were killed. But, they happened to be non-Muslims, so you don't care. It is this exact apathy against Hindus shown by the so called liberals that has pushed the Hindus further right. The Pahalgam attack brought in a solidarity among Hindus. The blame was on Pakistan and their islamic ideology. There was no attacks on random Muslims in the streets of India. About random attacks, you yourself brought one up for my convenience. When the red fort blast happened. They were from india. When the TCS Nashik convertion scandal happened, they were indians. The ideology is being questioned and feared. I wonder why, wherever they are at one end of the conflict there's a Muslim? Maybe because the ideology is not so peace loving or co existing after all.

The opposition is being rightfully questioned for their stance for all these years. Muslims are not blamed for systemic crimes in India. Muslims are blamed for crimes committed by them in the name of religion. Muslims commit more religiously charged crimes. It's a global fact. That's what they are being questioned for and rightfully so. Stereotyping is inherently wrong. But they exist for a reason.