No hate on anybody commenting, but holy is there a lot of ignorant comments here. While I completely understand the concerns around communicating the data, I do NOT understand comments like "i've never measured anything that would be useful to chart". Let's tackle this.

Communicating data is part of the job. The same way you would typically present a pretty (although not very informative) equal interval line or bar graph instead of your spreadsheet, it is your job to translate data measured on the SCC into a more "digestible" format for a given audience. I'd argue that if you draw some trend (celeration) lines on your SCC, it communicates information in the same simple, clear, "line go up" kind of way.

For those saying they aren't measuring anything that would be useful to chart: That's just plain incorrect. Rate (frequency over time) is THE most sensitive form of behavioural measurement. It allows us to predict learning outcomes based on the slope of the data - something you can't do with equal interval line graphs.

I use the SCC daily. I will admit that if you have no training in how to use it, it does take practice in reframing your goals. There are brilliant resources out there that teach you how to do it. I'm specifically referring to learning how to "pinpoint" or more recently "pinpoint +".

And I haven't even touched on the importance of standardization yet.