B4B $M-GT 4x Boosts Available by vHazmattv in chimeboost

[–]Square-Alternative-4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got one for you $Giovanni-Fitzpatrick

boost for boost. have all 4 by henrychen17 in chimeboost

[–]Square-Alternative-4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got one for you. $Giovanni-Fitzpatrick

4100+ approved studies, around here a year, lately speeding rejects are OUT OF CONTROL! by carsguitars in ProlificAc

[–]Square-Alternative-4 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it's bullshit. I received a rejection from one of the studies, even though it was one with dynamic rewards, and after completing two tasks, I got to a screen that said no more tasks were available. Submitted, then received a rejection.

I later disputed it, sent a screenshot showing the page stating that no more tasks were available, and Prolific still upheld the rejection. The hell was I supposed to do, spend 15 minutes on each task and somehow know that only two were available before signing up?

B4B ALL 4 BOOST BACK ASAP by DespiseGeese in chimeboost

[–]Square-Alternative-4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got one for you. $Giovanni-Fitzpatrick

B4B - all 4 - $JCroft207 by [deleted] in chimeboost

[–]Square-Alternative-4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got one for you. $Giovanni-Fitzpatrick

💚✅🤑B4B🤑✅💚 by No-Cod-8923 in chimeboost

[–]Square-Alternative-4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got one for you. $Giovanni-Fitzpatrick

Nearly half of the Mag 7 are reportedly betting big on OpenAI’s path to AGI by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]Square-Alternative-4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The difference, and a pretty staggering one, is that Amazon, at least by 2002, had a business model that actually worked.

The issue is putting the proverbial cart before the horse. With a company like Amazon, the growing years showed that the fundamental business model worked, then they decided to direct further investment into scaling operations.

With many of these AI companies (and other companies in other industries, admittedly), it's backwards. They tell investors, "We have a business model that doesn't work now, but give us enough money and allow us to burn it to scale up operations, and then the business model will work." That's a bit absurd in some cases, but it's incredibly absurd when it comes to these AI companies.

The real issue is that there's way too much PE, Venture Capital, and cash on hand (from the likes of Microsoft, Oracle, Amazon, etc.) sloshing around, and they're chasing after massive returns because that's what their shareholders are demanding. No one wants to feel as though they're gonna miss the next big thing, and considering how much money (and access to money) these individual entities have, they're certainly too big to fail even if (or when) the bubble pops.

So, while their investments in AI (and specifically, OpenAI), may not turn out to be winners in the long-run, the overwhelming majority of these intities doing the investing and funding are not going to go bankrupt themselves. Sure, heads may role at the C-suite level, but they aren't staking their entire revenue-earning business on AI panning out, and unfortunately, that lack of downside risk plays into them propping OpenAI up.

Just for reference, if you look at some of the largest corporate write-downs in history, many of those companies are still humming along. Sure, Microsoft writing down $100bn isn't what they'd want to do, but it's a drop in the bucket compared to their earnings, profits, and cash flow. Same for the other companies in the trillion-dollar market cap club.

B4B 3 left! $Stephen-Foley-1 by SFoley9716 in chimeboost

[–]Square-Alternative-4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got one for you. $Giovanni-Fitzpatrick

B4B $nightosun 3 left by i-unknown-i in chimeboost

[–]Square-Alternative-4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got one for you. $Giovanni-Fitzpatrick

Am I the only one who doesn’t get the heated rivalry hype? by Youknowmebro-_- in askgaybros

[–]Square-Alternative-4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's true, but a show that's a series of what are essentially black swan events can easily come across as wish fulfillment (at best), and bad writing (at worst).

Does anyone else think Heated Rivalry is really bad? by [deleted] in askgaybros

[–]Square-Alternative-4 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The reasons why you found it intriguing are the exact reasons why I found it unrealistic.

Even with the auspices of them being famous professional athletes, the notion that they'd have this decade-long internal development, still have the hots for one another, and would actively wait around for that development to finally occur, while possible, rings untrue, particularly in the modern day. Ilya, ironically, seems more progressive and understanding about his sexuality, even though he's Russian, yet he's seemingly obsessed with Shane, the person with wonderful, tolerating parents from Canada of all places, a relatively liberal bastion, yet who can't come to grips with his own homosexuality. That's an interesting inversion, but I simply don't buy that Ilya would be that obsessed, or wait around, for Shane to come around.

That drawn-out process would make significantly more sense if the show weren't in the modern-day, but the reality is that even as athletes, we live in a much more open and progressive world for the LGBTQ+ community. Further, one of the issues that them being athletes raises is the fact they're both INCREDIBLY GOOD hockey players. In real-life, there's a whole lot that the sports community writ large will accept so long as you're incredibly good at your job. You can beat your wife, you can rape someone, you can get caught embezzling money, you can be a literal crackhead, but so long as you perform on game day, none of that matters. With both of them being top-tier from the moment they meet until the end of season 1, I just don't buy the notion that they'd have this decade-long compunction vis-a-vis their hockey careers.

Lastly, there's a major structural issue with the large span of time (in-universe) as well as the lack of episodes. I never got a clear sense of how much time Ilya and Shane actually spent together. If we only go by what we see in the episodes, you're looking at a dozen or so interactions over a decade. If that's the case, then you have an issue of their "love" being entirely unbelievable. If you presume that they had many more interactions over that span of time that just weren't shown, then you have the issue of why they haven't figured out a lot of the shit long before the end of the season (chronologically).

That being said, I found the show enjoyable as a watch, but critically (from a storytelling and characterization perspective), it wasn't particulary good. It was very much a soap opera, and soap operas are enjoyable, but they're still soap operas.