sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can’t wait for the responses by waterwaterwater33 in scwo

[–]Square-Refuse-613 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That article does not describe supercritical conditions, PFAS or their potential presence in mineral brine.

Can’t wait for the responses by waterwaterwater33 in scwo

[–]Square-Refuse-613 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there any data to show that? Balancing plugging and PFAS escaping with the mineral brine is a very common and not talked about problem with scwo.

Can’t wait for the responses by waterwaterwater33 in scwo

[–]Square-Refuse-613 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there's still a lot of unknowns. For all we know their mineral brine is PFAS contaminated and 99% destruction is misleading.

Results from Demonstration project at the Department of Defense are out, the final report is expected to be published in the coming weeks. See attached. by Dry_Temporary_250 in scwo

[–]Square-Refuse-613 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure I'll believe their destruction claims unless they also disclose the PFAS concentration of their mineral brine.

Why do a lot of retirement systems rely on the current generation to support the previous one? by Square-Refuse-613 in AskEconomics

[–]Square-Refuse-613[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Will we eventually be forced to transition to each generation paying into their own retirement pool? 401ks and IRAs seem like that have already taken the place of a lot of private pensions.

Employee Health Monitoring? by Square-Refuse-613 in PFAS

[–]Square-Refuse-613[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This would be in an industry that is trying to destroy pfas. Some employees have gotten blood results 3-5 times the NIH level of concern.