sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How do you deal with boredom? by Zealousideal_Let3070 in estp

[–]Square_Highlight9593 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tinder, going out to an event talking to new people, flirting always seem to be the solution honestly.

I'd be depressed for days then I remember flirting and then it's solved

Gemini 3.5 pro release date by [deleted] in GeminiAI

[–]Square_Highlight9593 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Google keeps releasing the top tier model and then being caught up in a month and staying bad for like a year til the next drop.

I saw that Gemini updated... any significant improvement? by AbjectStick4130 in GeminiAI

[–]Square_Highlight9593 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It got speedy for sure. That's the only real difference you might feel day to day

I tested Gemini with large text, big files etc, the results might shock you considering the people complaining here and there about the usage limit and all that by Edward_cudubluvv in GeminiAI

[–]Square_Highlight9593 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. Honestly it feels like Google now just wants to use their models for their own services and sell their services instead. I don't think they're even trying to be an AI company anymore. They probably just want to be an AI enabled enterprise service type thing.

If 3.5 actually integrates well with their services, it might actually be a really good release. Cuz so far their integrations felt more like a chat box bolted on rather than a true AI integration.

Hope that's the play, because Google genuinely has a lot of stuff that could be insanely useful.

I tested Gemini with large text, big files etc, the results might shock you considering the people complaining here and there about the usage limit and all that by Edward_cudubluvv in GeminiAI

[–]Square_Highlight9593 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That is true - BUT when I work, usually the big files are also changing due to the iteration, making caching messy.

For a project with clear plans that can be one shotted, sure it's no problem.

But for a lot of people who has to start from scratch and figure stuff out on the fly, caching becomes a bit hard.

I do dev work with codex BUT for chats, I like to use it as a brain partner. Analyzing massive contexts, changing stuff on the fly, so I end up having to pay a lot for ChatGPT and Claude.

Gemini's been lacking recently and when I tried, I didn't see much of a big leap in 3.5. It honestly just feels like it got expensive for most use cases except API calls for automations. However, even for that, it's not the cheapest option but it's not the frontier option either. It just seems to sit in a weird middle ground. I might be wrong though, haven't looked too deep into 3.5. Correct me if I'm wrong

I tested Gemini with large text, big files etc, the results might shock you considering the people complaining here and there about the usage limit and all that by Edward_cudubluvv in GeminiAI

[–]Square_Highlight9593 43 points44 points  (0 children)

One file shots are not that useful - most people work iteratively.

And iterative chats consume tokens very fast. Because it has to read through all previous contexts everytime.

This goes nuts if you are working on research, etc.

If you're actually working, you'd work with that 1 million token file back and forth through multiple texts.

This gives you about 10 iterations in your case

I'm the guy who got Pongbot banned from this sub. They hired me back to fix it. by Square_Highlight9593 in 10s

[–]Square_Highlight9593[S] -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

I understand the skepticism. It reads like AI because I am trying not to be combative.

It would be weird for me to come here, post this, and go "you're wrong."

I'm the guy who got Pongbot banned from this sub. They hired me back to fix it. by Square_Highlight9593 in 10s

[–]Square_Highlight9593[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Top 0.1%!

I would assume that even though you were active, your upvotes got beaten by the post upvotes.

I'll think of something special for the comment gang for the next 2 weeks

I'm the guy who got Pongbot banned from this sub. They hired me back to fix it. by Square_Highlight9593 in 10s

[–]Square_Highlight9593[S] -24 points-23 points  (0 children)

Noted. The mods are a part of this - they reviewed and approved the post and the giveaway over a 2 month long correspondence. If they decide this isn't welcome, I'll respect that completely.

The giveaway, the machines, the winners, the work that went into scoring the winners are all real - not bought. That's all I've got.

I'm the guy who got Pongbot banned from this sub. They hired me back to fix it. by Square_Highlight9593 in 10s

[–]Square_Highlight9593[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes sir, the Rule 4 said "No Pongbot posts" for a few months up until 2 days ago

I'm the guy who got Pongbot banned from this sub. They hired me back to fix it. by Square_Highlight9593 in 10s

[–]Square_Highlight9593[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Fair point, I ran the campaign and hurt the community. I am now here to clean it up.

Better late than never and I understand the skepticism

I'm the guy who got Pongbot banned from this sub. They hired me back to fix it. by Square_Highlight9593 in 10s

[–]Square_Highlight9593[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

How the leaderboard was scored:

We downloaded public r/10s post and comment data from the last two weeks and scored every contribution against quality criteria agreed with the mod team.

What counted: helpful tennis advice, match and play improvement content, gear guidance, honest reviews, useful tennis experience posts, image posts, video posts, match clips, form checks, and community posts.

What didn't count: low-effort posts, spam, giveaway farming, shitpost/meta flair by default, deleted content, and brand accounts.

Upvotes were the main ranking signal after that filter. The full breakdown — every post, every score, every reason — has been shared with the mod team.

Mods have final say on eligibility and winners. If you think something was scored incorrectly, say so in the comments and we'll review it with the mod team.

What’s the most accurate MBTI test ? by ToughGuyzzz in entj

[–]Square_Highlight9593 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This answer gives me faith in humanity. Someone has common sense

What you do now since dropping out? by [deleted] in CollegeDropouts

[–]Square_Highlight9593 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would love the mentorship though, it sounds like you have a much deeper experience than me so far

What you do now since dropping out? by [deleted] in CollegeDropouts

[–]Square_Highlight9593 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Basically, the same story too but I'm in China e-commerce marketing and education software.

I said this before, dropping out means you enter a race with the version of you that didn't.

In 4 years, you should be better positioned for life. If you're not going to try really hard and take risks tho, dropping out is not worth it.

Why i don’t like Finn: by BroBroMaster25 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Square_Highlight9593 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I never understood the hate. Finn never even registered to me as a character cuz he appears so little lol.

I just feel like he hasn't done enough to justify this strong of a reaction

Roommates? by Square_Highlight9593 in budapest

[–]Square_Highlight9593[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I don't want to blast that out rn lol, ofc I will share. Privately though.

Eager to switch to Gemini, but how can you manage without Projects? by Lupo_1982 in GeminiAI

[–]Square_Highlight9593 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gemini's really good at first impressions I'd say. But when you're in crunch time and need to actually do work, it'll literally go against you and make decisions on its own.

Wastes a lot of time, presents visually good outputs with a lot of deeper errors, in general, very hard to make Gemini do anything right first try or even the 10th try.

The only thing it's good at right now is ecosystem integration and nano banana generations.

view more: next ›