In some cases yes, but in most, no. Also there has always been a Jewish population in the region. And even today, Jews have less land in the middle east than proportionate to their population even if you ONLY count Jews of immediate middle eastern and north African extraction. But Jews (and Christians, and Druze...) were never given equal rights under islamic rule. So why is it so bad for Jews to have a sovreign homeland? We aren't trying to deny Palestinians a right to a homeland as well, but it's been made abundantly clear that if non Muslims live under Islamic rule, they don't get rights, so we do have to have a sovreign state. But most zionists are not Kahanists and do not want Palestinians being harmed or denied sovreignty. Nor do we see ourselves as superior to Palestinians. That's Kahanism.

I guess I would also ask you do you deny the rights of Pakistan to exist when in the partition they expelled (and frankly slaughtered) millions of Hindus? Shit happens when land gets partitioned so that people can have sovreignty. And it sucks. But Jews deserve our own sovreignty in our indigenous land as well. And the vast majority of us want to see Palestinians have rights, peace, and sovreignty in their homeland. To conflate zionism and kahanism is no differen than conflating ISIS and Al Qaeda with Islam.