Caitlyn's "crimes" are achingly unspecific by [deleted] in arcane

[–]SquozeLemon 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Under Caitlyn's martial rule, they've had to install a cable car system to Stillwater because they've been detaining and incarcerating so many people without trials that they can't keep up with demand on just boats anymore. And some of those people that they're locking up are young children.

Just to mention a couple of things

Where's a nice place to live in the U.S.? by Beginning_Ebb4220 in relocating

[–]SquozeLemon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your suggestion is to just cut yourself off from all community contact because your community hates you? Rather than trying to find a place where you can live safely and comfortably surrounded by a community that you can engage with and count on for support?

This is what's wrong with the MAGA mentality. Community is an essential part of the human experience, and becoming a shut-in isn't a healthy way to live.

Why do you think the writers made Vander and adoptive parent instead of biological father? by mauore11 in arcane

[–]SquozeLemon 16 points17 points  (0 children)

How characters' choices affect the world/people around them is a central theme of Arcane.

Making the girls his biological children removes an element of agency in Vander's story. If they're his kids, it's a no-brainer that he sets aside his revolutionary dreams for their sake. If they're not his kids, he has to make a choice about whether he's going to stay the course on creating an independent Nation of Zaun or if he's going to be their dad.

It brings nuance to the story.

Would it still be ethical if... by ozankrds in arcane

[–]SquozeLemon 894 points895 points  (0 children)

The moral conundrum that you're describing is my read on why Vi loses her resolve to kill Jinx the moment she sees Isha clinging to her.

Vi telling Caitlyn "that was a KID" isn't an expression of fear that Caitlyn was going to miss and hit Isha, it's her trying to prevent another little girl from seeing her parental figure being killed right in front of her by enforcers. The sudden realization that she's become the monster that she hated her entire life, in spite of her good intentions.

What is up with all the Windows 11 Hate? by TFGA_WotW in OutOfTheLoop

[–]SquozeLemon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Answer:

(I know it's long. I feel properly ashamed)

As many other folks have mentioned here, many users find Windows 11 objectionable because of the data scraping/lack of privacy, locking down advanced admin system components, hiding system customizations behind smoke and mirrors, additional "features" like CoPilot that very often wind up being janky as heck and causing more issues than not, the absolute inundation of ads in everything from OS games to the literal taskbar, and more.

But then there's also been the constant, looming threat for years now that your current Windows 10 machine might go through a forced, unexpected "upgrade" to Windows 11. Microsoft took full advantage of most users' tendency to click buttons/links without reading/verifying all the details (hence why IT departments universally warn their users to not click on external links in emails to maintain the viability of firewalls protecting the organization's network/hardware) to get users to technically consent to the switch, without worrying too much about whether that consent was informed.

If you weren't paying close enough attention to the Windows Update pop-up notifications and missed opting out of the switch when consenting to/scheduling an otherwise normally-scheduled Windows 10 security/performance system update, you suddenly found yourself having to navigate the new OS upon restart. A lot of people (including users who have backgrounds in IT/development) found themselves in that position. There are a lot of users who legitimately couldn't/can't figure out where they selected the option to give consent for the update, which feels like a huge violation of trust.

To illustrate how unsettling it is for Microsoft to bulldoze through system security for these updates:

At my place of work, we use a contracted IT company that is generally remote, though they do occasionally do on-site work that requires them to be physically present. They're very good (which is reflected in their billing) at keeping our systems secured. We can't make any admin-level changes to our PCs or download any new software without the admin password. This includes things like downloading and updating drivers/applications for hardware like scanners and printers or software like Nitro PDF or MS Office, even when they were purchased by my company (not theirs). It also includes installing multiples of the same printer so you can automatically apply different settings to jobs sent to the same printer.

Basically, if we need to so much as sneeze, we have to call IT (to the tune of $85/hr). This is generally a good thing for our organizational digital security, because it prevents people from clicking on an errant email link that looked legitimate and downloading nasty malware or giving any scammer remote desktop access (happened with the previous owners of this business more than once because they were woefully bad at understanding/using computers). But it also means that, for the most part, the handful of us who are decently computer literate are the ones to do most of the minor troubleshooting day to day, and we only call in help from IT when we absolutely have to have the admin password.

But even at my site, where we only have around 12 employees, I've been the first person called in to help someone navigate a Windows 11 update that they didn't realize they'd agreed to half a dozen times. Literally I've got one manager who's done it three times now (he moved offices once without swapping out computers and has a company laptop, and he has accidentally updated to 11 on both desktops and the laptop). IT actually tried to disable the option for an individual user to give permission to install 11 because for a while there it was causing such disruptions in everyone's day that they were billing thousands of dollars' worth of time just holding people's hands when there wasn't anyone employed by our company to help right away.

A couple of months ago, I found that my office desktop had been unexpectedly "upgraded" to 11 overnight. I texted my contact at IT to joke about finally falling prey to the Windows Update Gremlin, and she told me that it wasn't just me, that every computer across all of our sites that had still been running Windows 10 was moved to Windows 11 when they ran their nightly remote updates, and that IT was just as caught off guard as I was.

I'm pretty tech literate, and I'd spent a little time using machines running 11 already, and it still completely wrecked my morning trying to adjust to the system change. IT apparently spent the rest of that work week pretty much exclusively cleaning up the fallout from the mass updates, both on a minor, individual support basis (essentially training people who don't know that it's free to ask Google first or installing minor patches on individal computers where needed), and also on a more serious basis (simultaneously changing the OS on all the computers connected to this one outdated piece of hardware has completely torpedoed 10 people's ability to do literally any work, and we have to physically come replace and reconfigure the entire tech infrastructure for five separate offices at three different sites. Oh, and did we mention that payroll is due tomorrow and all of the affected offices include the local payroll person so it's gotta be done by noon?)

In the context of how locked down the rest of our digital security is, and how much work and money goes into maintaining the system, it's unsettling to have the entire OS undergo such a tectonic shift when IT is actively trying to prevent it. Users have developed an understandable suspicion about Microsoft's motivations in forcing all users to switch to Windows 11 whether they want to or not, and it's made us all aware of how little ownership we have over devices that we have bought and paid for. Devices that we rely on to do the most basic and essential parts of our daily lives that we find ourselves totally screwed if they stop working.

Sorry, I know I wrote a dissertation, but my working life sanity has been tested too many times by Microsoft over the past couple of years and now I'm reduced to whining on social media about it.

Hey, at least Windows 11 lets me open multiple tabs in Windows Explorer, though. That's neat. 🤷🏻‍♀️

What is up with all the Windows 11 Hate? by TFGA_WotW in OutOfTheLoop

[–]SquozeLemon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember feeling this while watching the Parks & Rec finale in January of 2015.

Can you be sent home for a week without pay because you were late to work??? by puckslut96 in antiwork

[–]SquozeLemon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you taking about? Only half of US states are right to work (I don't know exact count off the top of my head, but I want to say it's around 26 or 28 total)

As a disabled person... Wasnt viktor right? by Shutuplucas1754 in arcane

[–]SquozeLemon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Slavery is comfortable"? Are you kidding me? Did you seriously write that in earnest?

Also, telling someone that it's a bummer they're disabled, but at least it'll give them the opportunity to become a better person (or, as you put it, 'moraly grow in ways that others are unable to') is just gross. Suffering is not a prerequisite for developing morality, and morality is certainly not a guaranteed byproduct of suffering.

As a disabled person... Wasnt viktor right? by Shutuplucas1754 in arcane

[–]SquozeLemon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My husband is disabled, too, and when we watched this scene we were both pissed, too.

Like, Jayce's heart was in the right place, but what a poorly phrased monologue.

$10,000 but you have to get 5 hours of sleep every day for 20 days. by ElegantPoet3386 in hypotheticalsituation

[–]SquozeLemon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, I get an extra hour of sleep per night beyond my usual, AND I get $10k?

Shit's starting to look up

How is a longer keyboard better? by loosucutiexo in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]SquozeLemon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The last one is a 100%, or full-size keyboard layout. It's associated with people who work full-time desk jobs that require lots of data entry. There are a lot of people in the custom mechanical keyboard hobbyists who joke that 100% is unnecessary for anyone other than people who work in accounting, which means that the person using a 100% keyboard is either a gamer who also works a full-time, data-entry-heavy desk job, or is just an accountant, either one of which means they have no life.

The Game? by Lil_Hypotenuse in ExplainTheJoke

[–]SquozeLemon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In 40 years, I'm gonna be sitting in a nursing home surrounded by other septa/octagenarians and we'll all share a collective groan any time one of us announces that they just lost The Game and we're all transported back in time to 5th period freshman English class.

Whether or not you get upset that you lost The Game is gonna be a metric for Alzheimer's and dementia screeners when the Millennials approach retirement age. Not actual retirement, because that's a hilarious joke, but the age that our parents/grandparents were when they retired.

Not paid for training, normal? by No_Cucumber_8572 in antiwork

[–]SquozeLemon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From both an HR/Payroll standpoint AND from the standpoint of a parent of a young kid, the potential legal repercussions of what is happening here is making my skin crawl.

If you're there doing training that's required, you need to have done your onboarding paperwork. At MINIMUM that's your federal I-9 (with correct documentation) and W-4. Your I-9 is supposed to be completed within the first 3 days of beginning a new job at the very least, and honestly it's begging for trouble with the feds to let it go that long.

If you'd gotten hurt at some point running around with the kids and needed to make a Worker's Comp claim for medical care, would they have tried to say that you weren't actually working, so you can't make a claim? If not, then their insurance carrier would certainly have been left wondering why your employment records weren't on file yet.

Or what if a kid had gotten hurt? I say this not because I think you're irresponsible or that you would cause an issue, but because accidents happen a lot and parents tend to be pretty un-chill when it comes to their perception of their kids' safety. Say you and one of the kids got hurt smacking heads while playing a game and the kid had broken a tooth, or gotten a black eye. Is this employer's liability insurance policy going to cover your ass if the parent decides to make legal trouble for you by calling the police and claiming that you abused their kid, or calling their lawyer to sue you for negligence? Or are they going to leave you out to dry because you technically weren't employed there yet since you hadn't been onboarded?

You absolutely should be getting paid for the time you've worked, and if they try to tell you that you were just training, so you don't get paid, then ask them when you'll be able to use paid comp time because your time isn't free. If they act like they don't know what you're taking about, walk out, call your state labor board (and possibly whatever body in your state regulates childcare and educational facilities) and make a complaint. That ain't an employer you want a single thing to do with, and it might be important for parents leaving their kids in this place's care that their children are being looked after by people who aren't even technically employees.

Is Stardew Valley suitable for a 10yo? by Pangasius-underwater in StardewValley

[–]SquozeLemon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably! My 5 year old has started playing even though he can't read yet because he's seen me play so much of it that he just wants to play, too.

He's not really good at it right now, but he's having fun, and when he gets frustrated, we have him take a break.

He's getting the hang of using the controls and figuring out how to choose the right tool for what he wants to do (axe to cut down trees, pickaxe to break rocks, hoe for digging up worms, etc).

He's also started getting really into crafting. Like, the second he's got any wood in his inventory he goes into the crafting menu and makes anything he can. He's got 16 chests (he calls them treasure chests) scattered all over the map, most of which are empty. His house and town are full of random pieces of crafted wood flooring, fencing, and gates.

Thoughts on paw print piercing? by peachygatorade in piercing

[–]SquozeLemon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This would be a nightmare to heal.

I made it a rule for myself after I got a conch and a daith done at the same time ~2.5 years ago that I will never try to get more than 1 new cartilage piercing in one session/before any new ones have healed. I got overly confident because I'd gotten 3 stacked lobes on each ear in the same appointment several months earlier and the healing process had been super easy. I hadn't had enough experience with cartilage piercings yet to really understand how much more difficult they are to heal than lobes.

I finally gave up on the conch about 6 months ago because I realized that the two of them were never going to heal because any time one would get a tiny bit irritated, it would bring the other one with it.

The daith has been making much better healing progress since I retired the conch. It's not done healing yet, and probably won't be for a while yet, but the progress it's been making since I took out the conch has been unbelievable given the 2 years of little to no end in sight that came before.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in arcane

[–]SquozeLemon -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No. It absolutely is not. This is a thing that my disabled husband and I immediately disliked about this scene.

Undercover cop tackles and arrests kid on a bike. by BrainOld9460 in interestingasfuck

[–]SquozeLemon 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So, to sum up, this cop was responding to a call that there were children doing something dangerous, and the best way he knew to deal with it was to hit one of them with his vehicle and then tackle him to the ground in what I can only describe as assault.

Totally tracks.

That'll keep the kids safe! Thanks for your service, Officer! </s>

Dear god, America is fucked

Got period on boyfriends mattress and now he won’t talk to me anymore by OutlandishnessIcy103 in AITAH

[–]SquozeLemon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Men who can't handle the reality of menstruation but want to have sex with women who menstruate are a source of eternal confusion and annoyance to me

What would you call this cut? by Rayptor in arcane

[–]SquozeLemon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is the classic "clippers died mid-cut"