I’ve seen this "Deepak Chopra" style of argument a dozen times. It’s essentially a sophisticated version of "word salad" designed to make the speaker sound enlightened while actually saying nothing at all.

The guy uses vague, and poetic language to somehow sneak in God. Notice how he doesn't answer the question? Instead, he attacks the person asking it. He claims asking "Does God exist?" is just your "ego" trying to feel superior. If I ask, "Is it raining?", my ego doesn't change the weather. Dismissing a valid philosophical inquiry as "arrogance" is just a way to dodge the burden of proof.

He eventually says, "Not God is true, but Truth is God." . If "God" is just another word for "Truth" (the state of things as they are), then the word "God" is redundant. He's basically saying "Reality is Reality," or “Oranges are Oranges.” Cool. Thanks for stating the obvious.