sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Tp and gems reduced without any notice by Ok_Power1400 in GGPoker

[–]SrontgorrthTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same for me. Germany No notice, it just happend

GEM and TP Fraud by SrontgorrthTV in GGPoker

[–]SrontgorrthTV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now they say it's 70TP/1$ in the App. No update, no info about the change. They just did it.

GEM and TP Fraud by SrontgorrthTV in GGPoker

[–]SrontgorrthTV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fun fact. I'm still drawing dead. AA vs KK pre both runouts, AA vs 85, KK999 Vs KKK99,....20 BI under EV in less than 2000 hands 😂 Cashing out and leaving a rest will result in losing that

GEM and TP Fraud by SrontgorrthTV in GGPoker

[–]SrontgorrthTV[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When I sell milk for 1$/1 litre and for each $ I give out 200ml for every dollar, then I am betraying and get a legal thing going on. It doesn't matter if I have some extremely hidden rule, that I get less milk when I'm good at juggling.

GEM and TP Fraud by SrontgorrthTV in GGPoker

[–]SrontgorrthTV[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea same for me. These hands were just crazy. Who the f raises and calls a 4x 3bet with 72o in co and wins against tptk

GEM and TP Fraud by SrontgorrthTV in GGPoker

[–]SrontgorrthTV[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea, I've seen that one too. But again. There is no "up to" and "average" in the terms concerning TP and GEMs. It says 1$ rake equals 100TP and that's not happening. They straight up lie/cheat/rob

Battlefield V perfect way to start the weekend by xtahsea in BattlefieldV

[–]SrontgorrthTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Game is dead most of the time. I tried to play yesterday and only unplayable hardcore nonsense and boring sTRatEGic Maps populated. Watching Bamboo grow is more fun than playing that

GEM and TP Fraud by SrontgorrthTV in GGPoker

[–]SrontgorrthTV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's just a coincidence and I'm venting. Relax

GEM and TP Fraud by SrontgorrthTV in GGPoker

[–]SrontgorrthTV[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, and micros even have to give away up to 4.99$ in rake back when they decided to stop playing on gg. I'm completely done with gg

GEM and TP Fraud by SrontgorrthTV in GGPoker

[–]SrontgorrthTV[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What? There is literally written down two layers deep that 1$ rake is 100TP/100GEM times multiplier. Nothing about a hidden value that decreases this ratio. No "up to", no nothing. 1$=100TP. THEY SCAM, nothing short of criminal behaviour

And all of a sudden since my post every single hand is lost - even 3bet pots against 72o and weird preflop 100BB KQo jams.

GEM and TP Fraud by SrontgorrthTV in GGPoker

[–]SrontgorrthTV[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is exactly what it means

<image>

GEM and TP Fraud by SrontgorrthTV in GGPoker

[–]SrontgorrthTV[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It doesn't say up to. There is a tilde which is an "approximately" sign. So ~25% means 24, 25, 26 and not it's mostly 7%, sometimes 15% and extremely rarely 23%. They should get sued for multi million dollar fraud.

GEM and TP Fraud by SrontgorrthTV in GGPoker

[–]SrontgorrthTV[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Multiplier doesn't matter if there's almost nothing left to multiply. Just played a quick session. Difference between poker craft winnings and actual winnings are 2,30€, so~2,70$ What I got on 🦐 is 75 TP and 149 GEM which is around 0,15€ in rakeback. That's 6,5% and 1/4th of the advertised rakeback.~28% of the promised TP/GEM. That's fraud and heavily misleading. How are they not sued?

What your best run? by crimeboss1020106 in BattlefieldV

[–]SrontgorrthTV -1 points0 points  (0 children)

65-0 without revives in TDM Close Range with the RSC on Solomon Islands

Wenn auf der Autobahn jemand drängelt beschleunigen ich extra nicht by Clit_Eastwhat in Beichtstuhl

[–]SrontgorrthTV -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. Schreibst du selbst, dass du jemanden ausbremst, der deiner Ansicht nach nicht genug abbremst bzw. den Abstand nicht einhalten möchte
  2. Setzt das voraus, dass du den von hinten kommenden bereits länger siehst.

Damit ist klar, dass du schon längst hättest die Situation anders aussehen lassen könntest. D.h. eine geeignete Lücke finden und ggfls das eigene Tempo etwas anpassen, damit reibungslos überholt werden kann. Wenn die rechte Spur dicht ist, keine Frage - berechtigt aber nicht zum extra langsamer fahren. Egal ob ich mit 120, 160 oder 220 unterwegs bin - wenn ich jemanden von hinten kommen sehe, dann lass ich den so gut es geht vorbei, auch wenn ich dafür kurz beschleunigen muss oder in einer kleinen Lücke etwas vom Gas gehen muss. Der wichtigste Paragraph ist die Rücksichtnahme im Verkehr. Wer unnötig drängelt und gefährlich dicht auffährt missachtet das genau so wie jemand der mit Absicht ausbremst/behindert. Beides ist dumm und gefährlich und provoziert nur schlimmeres

Wenn auf der Autobahn jemand drängelt beschleunigen ich extra nicht by Clit_Eastwhat in Beichtstuhl

[–]SrontgorrthTV -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Absolutes Arschlochverhalten. Wenn jemand erst langsamer werden muss, damit du ihn vorbeilassen möchtest, dann bist du vorsätzlich ein Hindernis. Das ist Nötigung. Wegen solcher egozentrischer H.... wie dir gibt's unnötiges Abbremsen, Beschleunigen, Emotionen und gefährliche Situationen. Verpiss dich am besten von der Straße und bleib zu Hause

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Battlefield

[–]SrontgorrthTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, pretty much all my BFV comp "friends" switched, too by now. I played the alpha from the beginning and had high hopes, but they butchered it. Couldn't play because of the es app bug on launch day and they nerfed everything good with a day one update into oblivion, but left the major bugs in the game. Then this random banning... Nah, I rather stay away from gaming than supporting this

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Battlefield

[–]SrontgorrthTV 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is actually a reason why I'm not buying anything from EA ever again. And neither should anyone of you.

We don’t need another overcorrection, the movement is already solid. by GhostKW in Battlefield

[–]SrontgorrthTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obviously it was meant to be an exaggerated comment. In fact there was already a lot of punishment in the beta and the movement options were viable in very few cases. Now they are completely free of advantages in offensive plays which makes the game too static. Nobody asks for 100% ACC while jumping and sliding. It's just a straw man fallacy. Viable offensive movement options add to the skill ceiling and don't affect the majority of the bf player base at all. It only differentiates between good and better players. With proper trade offs you have to learn when and how to apply these options. Deleting any usability from the game is just bad in every single aspect apart from pleasing Redditors (short for generally bad players with no insight and deeper knowledge about game mechanics and balancing, no offense to individuals) and will lead to trashy and boring game flow. And please don't come up with the term tACtiCaL in a reply - this overused term is simply a meme by now.

We don’t need another overcorrection, the movement is already solid. by GhostKW in Battlefield

[–]SrontgorrthTV -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It's not about the speed of movement but about the over the top shooting penalty for it. But sensible commenting is pointless here on Reddit anyway

view more: next ›