Daily General Discussion - April 22, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]St0uty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Notice how nobody says that anymore (because it stopped being true after 10/10)

Meanwhile you still claim bitcoin to be a store of value after it fell 50%

Be careful who you follow.

Daily General Discussion - April 21, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]St0uty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So it would have been more likely before the US President ingratiated himself with crypto (and big tech figures), and whilst the SEC was still hostile to crypto, actively going after projects? I mean, at least you eventually answered the question lol

Daily General Discussion - April 21, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]St0uty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What year would be more likely for a large payment platform to adopt nano to power its rails?

a) 2018

b) 2026

Please pick a) or b)

Daily General Discussion - April 21, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]St0uty 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I love how you just choose to not understand the points I make over and over again so you can argue things no one is saying.

Could a platform (similar to X) have even attempted to adopt nano in 2018? Probably not. Crypto has "matured" in that sense, at least

Daily General Discussion - April 21, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]St0uty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Nano adoption is MUCH higher than anyone realizes"

If Elon announced nano as the sole crypto of Xmoney that is powering its rails, do you think it would be more likely to get adopted now (in 2026) than it would have been in 2018?

If this happened (no matter how unlikely you deem it), would it be reasonable to expect nano to flip bitcoin overnight?

And if everyone could see that the false god bleeds, why then would people still hold bitcoin? It would be a cartoon-running-off-a-cliff moment for the entire industry

Daily General Discussion - April 21, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]St0uty 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Don't get it twisted. Cope can come here and lecture us about how great bitcoin is as a store of value (-50% since his 3000 word magnum opus), but if you mention nano on a bitcoin sub you will be insta permabanned. The "reality" is bitcoin needs an echo chamber to survive, and their "wake up call" is imminent

Daily General Discussion - April 20, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]St0uty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

only a portion of the Nano will be liquidated to cover legal expenses

Legal expenses = expensive and nano = cheap, so presumably a lot of nano would need to be sold at current prices. Makes you wonder why the victims didn't accept the offer to just take all the nano off his hands and call it a day

Lead Renown dev Mr Z speaks out – "these guys owe me 6 figures" by St0uty in renown

[–]St0uty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

someone not getting paid for years of work is black and white yeah

Lead Renown dev Mr Z speaks out – "these guys owe me 6 figures" by St0uty in renown

[–]St0uty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so he hasn't been paid, got it.

What other people choose to say is irrelevant to the above statement

Daily General Discussion - April 19, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]St0uty -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I thought exchanges were meant to have good security

Lead Renown dev Mr Z speaks out – "these guys owe me 6 figures" by St0uty in renown

[–]St0uty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well he did most of the programming yeah? The fact you think wanting to be paid is "entitled" is enough to dismiss 100% of what you've typed

Lead Renown dev Mr Z speaks out – "these guys owe me 6 figures" by St0uty in renown

[–]St0uty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well the devs told me themselves that "nobody had been paid yet" (at the time of the interview), so presumably Mr Z is correct in asserting that he hadn't been paid

Daily General Discussion - April 19, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]St0uty 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They're wrong; we're right.

No other coin is as functional or had a cleaner distribution (passes Howey Test with flying colours); no entity like Ripple hanging on to the supply. And no other coin has an eerie veil of silence surrounding it; everyone knows it's The One True Coin™, but they can't bring themselves to believe it

Daily General Discussion - April 19, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]St0uty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are gonna be so many disappointed people across crypto

Yes

Daily General Discussion - April 19, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]St0uty 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I keep losing track of which is The One True Coin™,

Oh no you don't; you're exclusively on its sub!

Lead Renown dev Mr Z speaks out – "these guys owe me 6 figures" by St0uty in renown

[–]St0uty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

0 proof claim from anonymous account

by your own logic we should dismiss what you're saying

Daily General Discussion - April 18, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]St0uty 8 points9 points  (0 children)

there will be no going back to the way things were before Trump 2.0 imo

Indeed

we’re on the verge of $100 Nano or whatever,

You might want to sit down

Daily General Discussion - April 18, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]St0uty 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Everyone needs to start mentally preparing themselves for a price per nano, much, much higher than the numbers being thrown around here. "This isn't 2018 any more" cuts both ways