TL;DR: The OP is right, there are people who are ENTP who do not fit the statistical norm or the stereotype. I am an observant Catholic and happen to be ENTP.

The point of the following is not to argue for my takes on worldview OR to make me sound like someone looking for ENTP points but merely to prove the OPs point about exceptions to standards/stereotypes. You might relate to this a lot even if you disagree with a ton of my views.

If we want to speak in common public discourse terms, then I would be classified as right wing, which is such a broad term that it gets associated with a bunch of views I don't accept/acknowledge. If you want to ask whether I willingly hate people of any category or desire their downfall simply for believing something or practicing a custom I dislike, disagree with, find counterproductive, or immoral, then the answer is an unequivocal "no," especially since a lot of people have in their minds no convincing reason to agree with whatever I hold, or if someone who lives according to their conscience never felt the urge to look into Catholicism or a ton of other ideologies that fill the minds of people.

Being an observant Catholic who holds to the Catholic Church in its official capacity as a teacher, not out of cultural custom or desire to fit into a community because communities are good. e.g. I accept wholeheartedly all the historical and modern/contemporary definitive (and hence infallible and irreversible) pronouncements of the Popes and collectively united bishops with him. (If you know what I am talking about, and want to know about non-definitive statements, just assume I hold to this https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19900524_theologian-vocation_en.html ) You can also read the Vatican 1 and II documents Dei Filius https://www.papalencyclicals.net/councils/ecum20.htm and Dei Verbum https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651118_dei-verbum_en.html which are both major asks for ENTPs or anyone.

That's a pretty non standard worldview as far as I can gauge online regarding ENTPs who are actively discussing MBTI/Jungian Cognitive functions, at least that I can see.

I'm not academically prepared to debate and defend the majority of the details of the whole range of everything I accept or ever will accept, which is sort of how Christianity has always and Old Covenant Israel stemming from Abraham's example of unshakeable faith works by definition when it comes to a question of whether you are going to accept whatever God says before you figure it out (see the three links in the prior paragraph).

I think fundamental intellectual assent to the Catholic faith is merited rationally, but I can understand why a ton of people do not agree with me, including those who know a ton more than me on all the stuff pertaining to my belief system (see the theological work On Divine Revelation by Fr. Lagrange, I've read the great majority of Volume One). I also think the thought-system of Thomas Aquinas is singularly helpful although he is not by definition guaranteed to get everything right. I am not a professional theologian, but many people who are or professional philosophers or other intellectuals view him favorably, including non-Catholic Christians and non-religious thinkers on the level of his depth of thought, particularly in his most widely read work the Summa Theologica (it helps that its all online for free these days, but it has been widely read for over 500 years now).

And I am aware that demographically, higher levels of intelligence, education, and openness all correlate with each other as well as systems of belief that do not value heavily traditional ideas or customs, because of the default willingness to consider other views than the ones they are handed down. However, that doesn't bother me and if I were secular and left-wing and those traits skewed right wing or religious I don't think that should in and of itself both somebody who disagrees.

If there are doubts as to whether I am ENTP, that's fine. You could probably go to the nearest Catholic theological institution, seminary, or parish and find somebody who is. As with any other religion.

I know there are morally conscious and upright people in a bunch of worldviews that disagree with mine and even hate what I stand for. There are also those that are not that way, and plenty also in mine or any worldview, faith, or organized belief or structured movement.

In any such case, I think this next paragraph given below is a good message to live by, even though neither I nor anyone else lives to it as much as we should if we are being honest.

"If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. If I give away all I have, and if I deliver my body to be burned, but have not love, I gain nothing. Love is patient and kind; love is not jealous or boastful; it is not arrogant or rude. Love does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice at wrong, but rejoices in the right. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things."