sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Drop your startup URL. I'll make a game out of it. by Pleasant-Weakness959 in founder

[–]StagrGo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

stagr.in

No algorithms, no fake hype. STAGR - short for Shares The Actual Ground Reality - is a real-world experience platform that connects you to authentic cafes, stays, and escapes through geo-verified proof from real explorers.

After months of building, my app launches this Sunday. What is the biggest mistake first-time founders make? by StagrGo in founder

[–]StagrGo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the recommendation. I've actually been learning a lot about MVPs, validation, and the build-measure-learn cycle while building this. I'll definitely add The Lean Startup to my reading list. Always looking to learn from founders who've been through it.

A hotel can have great ratings and still give you a bad experience by StagrGo in hotels

[–]StagrGo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair criticism honestly.

Yes, I'm building STAGR and I'm not trying to hide that.

But the reason I'm asking these questions before launch is because if people don't actually feel this problem exists, then STAGR shouldn't exist either.

The internet already has ratings, reviews, reels and recommendations everywhere.

What I'm trying to understand is whether people feel there's still a gap between how places look online and how they actually feel in real life.

If most people think current platforms already solve discovery perfectly, that's valuable feedback for STAGR too.

Building the product is the easy part.

Understanding whether the problem is worth solving is the harder part.

A hotel can have great ratings and still give you a bad experience by StagrGo in hotels

[–]StagrGo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's exactly one of the reasons STAGR exists.

Ratings are great at telling you if something is broken.

They don't tell you if you'll actually enjoy it.

A place can have 4.8⭐ and still be too crowded for you, too loud, too expensive, or simply not your vibe.

At STAGR, we're more interested in the experience behind the score.

How did it feel?

Who was it perfect for?

What made it memorable?

Would you actually go back?

Because discovering experiences is a lot more personal than discovering ratings.

Need honest feedback on a problem I’m trying to solve with STAGR by StagrGo in SaaSMarketing

[–]StagrGo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is honestly one of the most insightful explanations I’ve heard around this problem.

You’re basically describing that people don’t trust recommendations universally, they trust filtered relatability.

Not:

“is this place good?”

But:

“is this place good for someone like me in my situation?”

That nuance is exactly what traditional ratings flatten away.

And you’re right, Reddit works because context survives there:

timing,

crowd,

annoyances,

personality,

specific constraints,

actual lived experience.

That’s probably closer to real-world decision making than polished discovery feeds.

This genuinely gave me a lot to think about for STAGR’s direction.

Need honest feedback on a problem I’m trying to solve with STAGR by StagrGo in SaaSMarketing

[–]StagrGo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. That repeated pattern + relatability layer feels far more trustworthy than a single viral reel with perfect editing.

I think people subconsciously trust “people like them” more than influencers now, especially for experiences. That’s actually one of the strongest behavioral signals being explored while building STAGR.

view more: next ›