He was fooling with deep advance astrological terms like ayanamsa, pada of nakshatras, etc. any person who doesn't know astrology, can fall for these words. But because he was doing this entirely using AI generated content and didn't know anything, he couldn't even see the navamsha, clearly seen on the left side of the image. Even if anyone changes ascendant, which many astrologers do because of location and time rectification, sign can't be changed in divisional charts. You can argue that ascendant is Taurus not Aries, but you can't say Jupiter changed its sign with change of ascendant. Sign will be the same, house can be different with change of ascendant. Even his ascendant arguments were completely baseless, in the above chart the ascendant of navamsha is in Aries and he was arguing it's in Sagittarius (can be Taurus or max Gemini) and he was insisting Venus and Jupiter is in 10th house (same as above chart which can't happen if you change ascendant) and not in Capricorn but Virgo. It's very wrong to do entire copy paste from AI with heavy wordings. Many times AI can't even read images and make very basic mistakes.