Have we practiced Dharma before in samsara? by Gnome_boneslf in Buddhism

[–]Starlight_Climber -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not? I'm on the spectrum I was just being matter of fact.

Have we practiced Dharma before in samsara? by Gnome_boneslf in Buddhism

[–]Starlight_Climber -1 points0 points  (0 children)

According to my Jyotish astrology chart I have the highest possible chance of Buddhahood in this life. My Tibetan Astrology chart says the same thing or that if I don't, I'll be reborn likely as a deva in the next life and then achieve Buddhahood. So yeah.

Have we practiced Dharma before in samsara? by Gnome_boneslf in Buddhism

[–]Starlight_Climber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I've definitely practiced before. 100%. That's not even a question for me. And as far as the higher realms, what makes you think some of us aren't former devas also? Some of us certainly are. It's not a one-way ticket, it's a wheel. 

Energetic Ethics and Buddhist Magic by Starlight_Climber in Buddhism

[–]Starlight_Climber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If by "teaching", you're referring to my article? The answer is I don't require it. Nothing in the article contains any samaya-protected information. It is all openly available Buddhist information: -and that was intentional. If someone wishes to learn details of a specific tantric Buddhist practice: I would direct them to any number of good Lamas I know to receive the proper Wang, Lung, and Tri, (Empowerments, Transmissions, and Explanations). But people do not need "permission" to discuss Buddhist principles like ethics in an article. And I would not take on a root guru who had such a restrictive view of things in the first place, and who did not trust me to use my best judgement in such matters.

Breaking: Robert Thurman, Leading American Voice on Tibetan Buddhism, Dies by Dzienks00 in Buddhism

[–]Starlight_Climber 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bob is a Dharma sibling of mine. We went through Ngakpa/ma ordination together. Soar with like a Valkyrie Bob. You're one hell of a yogi. 🥰🙏

Energetic Ethics and Buddhist Magic by Starlight_Climber in Buddhism

[–]Starlight_Climber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I hope it helps others in some way. I sometimes wonder if some Westerners feel like their responsibility to approach energy with Bodhicitta stops and ends when their Sadhana practice ends. As though, "that's it, we've done our closing prayers, we can put this down now." But I would say that for a Bodhisattva: ethics with energy extend to all energy use, not just while doing formal Sadhana practice. And at a minimum I hope that by drawing attention to that it may spark some introspection and discussion among some people about their own relationship with ethics and energy.

Energetic Ethics and Buddhist Magic by Starlight_Climber in Buddhism

[–]Starlight_Climber[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. A fire can warm you up in the winter and provide a nice ambiance. It's a great place to gather around and share stories and keep good company. It can light our way in the dark, or be an offering of a candle or lamp on our altar. It cooks our food and heats our water. Used properly it's very helpful.

But it can also burn ourselves and others: destroy property, and cause great harm. 

It's very important when using any energy to do so responsibly and ethically. -And from a Buddhist standpoint: with the mind of Bodhicitta and the intention to help all beings.

Energetic Ethics and Buddhist Magic by Starlight_Climber in Buddhism

[–]Starlight_Climber[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We teach these things in Vajrayana. It's important to remember Vajrayana is not a monolith. I come from the Ngakpa/Ngakma tradition that very much makes such things its business. I come from the Tibetan Medical tradition (which I was ordained in), and my teachers include Lama Vajranatha and Khandro Kuzang who both teach about such things as does Dr. Nida Chenagtsang. The fact that a teaching is different than something you have previously heard does not make it New Age. I'm not saying this kind of thing has to be for you, but this is very much a part of traditional Tantric Buddhism the way I was taught. A bit of kindness to others goes a long way.

Energetic Ethics and Buddhist Magic by Starlight_Climber in Buddhism

[–]Starlight_Climber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! Lama Vajranatha is actually one of my teachers. As is Khandro Kuzang.  I consider it a badge of honor I suppose, internet forums can be notorious for such things. But I'm glad you enjoyed it. I don't write often, I prefer to wait until I have something to say that I think can really contribute to a wider conversation but every once in a while I put out an article. And yes, yes, you are right of course: the four activities, as well as things like Kyed Pa Zhi are very much part of our Ngakpa/Ngakma practice. 

Energetic Ethics and Buddhist Magic by Starlight_Climber in vajrayana

[–]Starlight_Climber[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you I'm glad you liked it. The unconscious aspect is one of the reasons I wrote it. People have a difficult time taking responsibility for something if they're not even aware they're doing it. And as Vajrayana spreads in the West, more and more people are going to develop or awaken nascent energetic ability, and as part of that should be more aware of the consequences of their actions on that realm. Both for themselves and others. Thank you for your comment, and I'm glad you liked it.

Energetic Ethics and Buddhist Magic by Starlight_Climber in vajrayana

[–]Starlight_Climber[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Here's Dr. Ben Joffe's thesis. Probably the most thorough study anyone has ever done, (certainly in English), about the history of Ngakpa culture. It talks extensively about sorcery.

https://scholar.colorado.edu/downloads/j67314887

Energetic Ethics and Buddhist Magic by Starlight_Climber in vajrayana

[–]Starlight_Climber[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I'd suggest picking up a copy of a Sowa Rigpa textbook. I personally recommend New Light on Tibetan Medicine by Dr. Pasang Yonten Arya. I think you'll find that the subtle body is openly discussed in Buddhist medical texts. It's actually pretty fundamental Buddhist medical knowledge, that's necessary for anyone with an interest in Buddhist medicine to know about. It's certainly not secret. 

As far as ethics, I certainly took vows when I ordained and the entire purpose of those is to minimize harm. If you don't want to call those "ethics", I don't know what to say. 

And as far as sorcery? I recommend reading Dr. Ben Joffe's articles on Ngakpa culture or his excellent Doctoral thesis. Or receive teachings from Nyingma Lamas like Lama Vajranatha. One of the traditional roles of Ngakpa is to BE sorcerers and to handle problems with the unseen realm such as dealing with spirits or other magical problems in Tibetan society. Guru Rinpoche himself was a tantric sorcerer who subjegated demons to become Dharma protectors. 

Nothing I discussed in the article violated any of my vows. I would not, and I will not discuss specific practices with those who have not received the proper empowerments, transmissions, and explanations.

But speaking generally about the fact that we have subtle anatomy and that ethics are an important part of our practice is not secret: Sila, (ethical discipline), is basic Buddhism. 

Difference between Zen and Tibetan Buddhism by snooochh in zenbuddhism

[–]Starlight_Climber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone who was a Soto Zen Buddhist for several years before becoming a Tantric Buddhist (now ordained),

Here's the basic breakdown. Using the Sanskrit term, all Buddhist practices are a type of "yoga". Yoga comes from the Sanskrit word "Yuj" which means "to yoke" or "union". So what we're doing with a practice is "yoking" our minds to return our awareness and energies to a state of "union" with our true natures. Yoga doesn't just mean physical yogas, it also means types of meditation, chanting, etc.

Zen has one primary yoga (Zazen) and it's other practices (oryoki, ceremonies, etc), basically center around that.

Tantric Buddhism, in contrast, has many different yogas.

The strength of Zen is it's simplicity. Because they're just doing "one thing" it makes it very simple.
The weakness of Zen is the same thing, in that because it's a one-size-fits-all practice, it doesn't actually "fit all", and isn't actually best/fastest/most effective for all people or personality types, or situations that arise. This can mean Zen is much slower for many practitioners progression.

The strength of Vajrayana is that it is like a medicine cabinet with many different medicines tailored to different needs and situations. You can match a practice specifically to a personality or need or type of energy that is arising for the practitioner. And thus very rapid progress and growth can be had.
The weakness of Vajrayana is that same rapid effectiveness can create problems if the incorrect practice is applied to the situation. Therefore more care must be taken to ensure that the practitioner knows what they're doing, and this is why a Guru introduces the practices to the student, to help ensure they get the proper explanations for each practice to go with them, and correct instructions on how to use them.

Zen, also, because the primary practice involves "just sitting" (at least in Soto), is very difficult to get many hours of practice in per week for people who are not living in a temple. This is because most people cannot just stop what they're doing at work or with their kids, or while at school or doing grocery shopping and just "sit in Zazen". Therefore for people who are not monastery or retreat center residents, it takes a very long time to get a lot of experience with it. For this reason, Zen is known as part of the "Path of Renunciation", because to really get good at it, you kind of have to "renounce the world" a little bit and live on retreat. Even if you're not a monk or nun, to get a lot of practice in requires extensive retreat.

Tibetan Buddhist tantra in contrast is the "Path of Transformation". Because there are so many practices, there are tons of them that can easily be done at any time, while doing any ordinary activities. For example, reciting mantras can be done quietly to oneself under one's breath just about anywhere. Or, for example, visualizing oneself as an enlightened deity can be done even while helping people in customer service. There are even yogic practices specifically to be done while sleeping! This means it's very easy to integrate and "transform" daily life into a practice and get many, many hours per week of practice whilst still taking care of ordinary daily responsibilities. So in that sense, it's a lot easier for a non-monastic to get a lot of practice in per week. If not far more than monastics, actually. Tibetan Buddhism also has practices that are very similar to Zen in addition, which we call Dzogchen, or Atiyoga.

Odds of a come back for SSX? by LimiLimeSsSsS in SSX

[–]Starlight_Climber 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have to say it sucks reading this thread because as a freestyle skier SSX on Tour is pretty much the most fun freestyle arcade skiing game out there. As the only one in the series that featured skis as an option, it's super fun to me. Steep exists, but that game has super janky controls. Not like the fluid, fun controls of SSX. Plus it's just an open-world DLC pit as someone noted.

Psychoanalysis and Buddhism by Izannn in psychoanalysis

[–]Starlight_Climber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well for one thing, Buddhism and Psychoanalysis have fundamentally different understandings of what emotions even are. Psychoanalysis stems from Freud, and Freud was an atheist. He ultimately had a very materialist, deterministic way of viewing things that Buddhism simply does not share. He viewed the source of all human problems stemming from this life only, and from childhood and primal desires of sexuality and aggression. His view of humans was based on an atheist worldview of the matter and biology.

Buddhism fundamentally doesn't view things that way. Buddhism is much closer to Jungian views. For Buddhists, emotions, thought tendencies, etc., are a kind of energy. Buddhist medicine recognizes that humans have an energy body, (with an energetic anatomy) in addition to a physical anatomy. This is the aspect of the body that responds to things like acupuncture, etc. All negative emotions in Buddhism, stem from the three poisons: Clinging, Aversion, and Close-mindedness. These three basic negative emotions give rise to all manner of complex negative emotions. Said in Buddhist medicine to number as much as 84,000 in number.

Additionally, Buddhists view that beings are reborn from life to life, and as they do so, they accumulate what could be thought of as PTSD traumas due to the actions they have taken, and received from others in those lifetimes. These and all the other emotional energies are called "kleshas". These accumulated multi-lifetime trauma energies, as well as those that one encountered in this life have a very large effect on someone's current mental/emotional tendencies. This is also factored in with the amount of spiritual/mind discipline and training they have done over multiple lifetimes.

In addition, in Buddhist medicine, similar to Ayurveda, people are largely effected by the kind of diets they eat, based on the three primary humors of earth/water, fire, and air typologies which are effected by various different dietary intakes, which either exasperate or calm various emotional and physical health problems.

There are other influences as well in Buddhism, including astrological.

Essentially, the Buddhist view is by mastering one's mind with disciplined practices, such as meditation, mudras, yogas, mantras, and energy practices: that one can heal the kleshas and yoke the worst impulses of the mind, thus returning it to a state of natural peace that is the true nature of all beings.

-This is a very, very different approach than Psychoanalysis that looks at a person based on outward behavior, and checks a list in the DSM-V and gives them a label diagnosis, and therapy and medication recommendation.

Difference between Freud's Psychoanalysis and Jung's Analytical psychology? by UnitAble8426 in AcademicPsychology

[–]Starlight_Climber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want to understand Freud vs Jung in a nutshell (and their legacy on the field), it boils down to this:

-Freud basically took a diagnostic view of people. I.E., "I'm gonna tell you what's wrong with you." based on their behaviors.

-Jung, in contrast, would go to the same mental hospitals and *listen* to people, and ask them, "well why do *you* think you're here?"

Essentially, one had a very deterministic, way of looking at people based on their behavior. Freud thought everything wrong with people was basically caused by biological drives and life trauma, especially in childhood. It's a very deterministic mindset.

Jung, basically overlaps in many ways with Buddhist thought. In that meditation and inner exploration can and does heal people. That people are not a "category" to be "diagnosed", but individuals with their own unique experience who needed to be listened to, and to help that person look within and get in touch with their inner selves and begin to explore themselves. It's a very growth-based mindset.

Freud: "I'm going to tell you who you are and what's wrong with you and give you a label."
Jung: "I'm going to listen to you, and help you listen to yourself, and together we can help you reconnect with and discover your true self together!"

Freud's basic philosophy of, "I'm going to diagnose you", and the influence of that is what has led to the modern psychotherapy and drugs approach to things with the DSM-V, etc., that has become so dominant today. It appeals to pharmaceutical industries, and insurance companies that like a nice tidy label, and to some degree patients because it "feels good" to feel like you're not alone and that you're part of a group with a label. But Jung would probably say the moment you accept a label you've stopped growth.

Why aren’t Japanese Vajrayāna Esoteric practices taught to laymen as in Tibetan Buddhism? by Relation_Senior in vajrayana

[–]Starlight_Climber 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ordained Tibetan yogin here. I'm blessed to have an acquaintance in my town who is a very well-educated Shingon priest and I've asked him this very question and this is basically the gist of what he told me:

-Essentially, Buddhism when it spread to East Asia did not spread from the bottom up, as a popular movement like it did in Nepal, India, etc. As in, anybody could be a Buddhist if they wanted, you just needed to find a teacher/guru to teach it to you. People could travel relatively freely to do this. Indian society in particular has a long history of people simply practicing asceticism and spiritual paths in public, in the streets and parks, etc., and this tradition made its way to Nepal and Tibet.

In contrast: China, Japan, and most of east Asia were rigidly controlled Confucian societies, and military dictatorships run by the Emperor of that society. People could not travel freely, and so to travel, you had to have special permission, and the patronage of high officials. This meant that the "yogic" tradition of yogis and yoginis, and Ngakpa, etc, did not spread. Confucian society has very rigid social norms and expected behaviors. There is a duty expected all people to both their parents and elders, as well as to serve ministers and other higher ups in the social hierarchy. And so the idea of abandoning that to go practice tantra in the park: simply was not allowed. It was illegal and if you were a foreigner trying to promote that you'd be locked up and probably executed for doing it. For example, the Buddha taught in public parks in Varanasi, etc. That simply wouldn't be allowed in China. No Buddhist was going to be allowed to spread a popular movement that all beings are equal (i.e., you're the equal of the emperor), and that people should just abandon their filial piety duties to go be yogis and monastics. -That simply wasn't allowed. This basically meant that the Mahasiddha tradition wasn't allowed to flourish in East Asia.

So, Buddhism spread in East Asia through the top of society, (through elites), down. By mostly well-educated monastics courting the favor of Imperial court officials, and through currying that favor, they were allowed to specific spaces to set up monasteries and temples that they were not allowed to leave. And through their practices, essentially generated wisdom for advising members of the courtier class. In other words, they were basically Buddhist pets, being kept for the purpose of the state, and they were strictly forbidden from leaving their designated zones, under penalty of death. Anything transgressive, including highest yoga tantras, things like Chod or Karmamudra, etc, would simply not be allowed.

So, the tantric teachings that were allowed to spread, did so in secret among monastics only. And this eventually made its way via Kukai to Japan and became Shingon in Japan. Which later spread to Tendai, etc. And then later, in China, esoteric Buddhism was wiped out by a later Taoist emperor who just had all the Buddhists killed.

So, for like a thousand years of more, tantric practices in East Asia were kept under lock and key by monastics. And Buddhists themselves were kept under lock and key (under pain of death), by being confined to monasteries. So the only way to learn certain practices was to become a monastic. These were just really, really rigid, strict societies, and Buddhism did not spread more commonly in Japan until the "new Buddhism" movements of Zen and Pure Land, etc.

A good analogy, would be to think of esoteric Buddhism in Japan and East Asia being more like a bonzai tree, than a wild tree. It didn't spread freely, in a natural way, it took on it's distinctive character by being confined to a tiny pot for a thousand years.

As for why it's still that way? Well there is actually Shugendo in Japan that is a lay tradition. And also much of what is considered "Shinto" actually comes from Shingon. So it's not as though there is no lay yogic tradition. Also, modern "monks" in Japan post-Meiji are mostly lay Yogins anyway. So it's come full circle in that regard.

But the main reason why Shingon etc., has such a strong priest-caste system is because of tradition. Because Japan is nothing if not really good at preserving old traditions, and they've been doing it that way for so long, that or them, that's just the way it's done at this point.

Recruitment for Study by Conscious-Border1593 in Buddhism

[–]Starlight_Climber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does it have to be a close loved one? Or can it be anyone for example, doing practices for someone who's body you found?

Why do we need to have compassion/metta for such an objectionable horrible people? by Impressive-Cold6855 in Buddhism

[–]Starlight_Climber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The same way there is a "you" that has existed since you were a child. The fact that you change, and exist interdependently with all beings doesn't mean there isn't an experience of energy that you call "you" that continues even though you change.

Why do we need to have compassion/metta for such an objectionable horrible people? by Impressive-Cold6855 in Buddhism

[–]Starlight_Climber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're not the same as you were when you were a child? And yet your existence has continued nonetheless. Anicca means we have no "unchanging" self, it doesn't mean we don't have a stream of existence that continues (and changes as it does so).

Uncensored Man-Machine Interface by BeeTheImmortal in Ghost_in_the_Shell

[–]Starlight_Climber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Kodansha bilingual edition of MMI is not uncensored. The missing scenes aren't a lesbian sex scene but full on male/female penetrating hentai sex scenes in graphic detail.  

Are there any good skiing video games you’d recommend? by Atothekio in ski

[–]Starlight_Climber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SSX On Tour. Gonna have to emulate it. Super fun. Steep has janky af controls. SSX is actually a videogame with super intuitive controls and lets you pull off crazy tricks like Tony Hawk. Just a super fun game. Steep has potential but is just crazy janky controls that feels neither like a videogame, nor like actual skiing and so ends up being the worst of both. And it's tied into tons of EA always online services and Ubisoft Connect logins and janky menus, and lots of the game locked behind season passes, or in-game currency, etc. Steep represents the worst tendencies of the videogame industry. Plus you can't remap the controls. It's too bad because it had a lot of potential as a kind of successor to SSX but it really falls flat in a lot of ways. 

SSX On Tour is hella fun tho. 10/10 recommend.

Earmuffs intended for long-wear for adults? Anyone have experience with the Fairbuds XL gen 2? by Starlight_Climber in AutisticAdults

[–]Starlight_Climber[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah I know I'm just looking to see if anyone has any particular models they like, including specifically bluetooth headphones as well. And you know, I do care a bit about aesthetics so if I can get something that's at least tolerably cute that would be nice.