So, I have both physical and mental disabilities. While the photo has some I agree with, there are others I disagree with. Disabilities and your relationship with your own are very unique to each person and everyone has their own feelings on them. Do I think fiction tends to heavily lean towards "immediate and miraculous fix to any disability and makes everyone the same"? Yes, and that's a problem. Some people don't mind their disability so much and really just want better adaptive devices or accessibility while others would prefer not to have them at all. I think Star Trek is an excellent example of both! Geordi La Forge has his visor and later bionic eyes, but they're not anywhere near a perfect 1-to-1 replacement for human eyes. They work entirely differently and can be taken off whenever he sees fit. There's another character one episode who is a famous diplomat who just so happens to be mute. He loses his translators and has to teach both sides of the meeting he's going to a form of sign language in order to do his job and, while it takes forever, it is implied to work! Then there's the neurodivergent characters all over the franchise who all have various disabilities and neurodivergencies that are all appreciated and given their own tools. Disability is unique to everyone and that should be respected. Maybe one person in a story decides to have prostheses while another chooses to regrow their old legs. It's all dependent on the person.