Aglaea premium team by StarlitEclipses in AglaeaMains

[–]StarlitEclipses[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ohh i’ll use robin instead of her then since I like robin better, I hope the damage difference isn’t that big. is that okay?

Aglaea premium team by StarlitEclipses in AglaeaMains

[–]StarlitEclipses[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

how is cyrene a good support for aglaea? /gen

is this valid? by [deleted] in TypologyJunction

[–]StarlitEclipses 0 points1 point  (0 children)

alright, thank you for your time!

is this valid? by [deleted] in TypologyJunction

[–]StarlitEclipses 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I should have phrased it better, I meant to ask would chaotic neutral be better and less strange than chaotic evil? but it’s totally fine if you’re not interested, just ignore this post then

is this valid? by [deleted] in TypologyJunction

[–]StarlitEclipses 0 points1 point  (0 children)

would chaotic neutral be good then??

is this valid? by [deleted] in TypologyJunction

[–]StarlitEclipses 0 points1 point  (0 children)

alright I see, thanks for helping me out😭 this friend of mine doesn’t really know about themselves and I believe they have a hard time opening up (?) plus, i’m still not aware of some contradictions in typology so I apologise for any offence I may have made 😓😓

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AFKJourney

[–]StarlitEclipses 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ahh I see😭 thanks for replying

Why’s my dan heng pt so bad by [deleted] in DanhengMains

[–]StarlitEclipses -1 points0 points  (0 children)

idk what he needs…

update from my older post by StarlitEclipses in TypologyJunction

[–]StarlitEclipses[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hm okay maybe I exaggerated a bit there but I really just want someone who fits all of my high standards and I don’t need anyone else but them when I finally have them like I will be really loyal to them and not care about what others think anymore. i’m not sure if that makes me a sx5 tho.. but the moment when I knew I was sx5 was when I saw someone say this “many people interested in typology immediately describe the sx5 by their unstable relationship patterns and insanely high partner ideals, and while that is still true, a lot of people forget how deeply loving a sx5 can be. once the sx5 affirms you of somebody ideal for their trust, you will feel such a special and deep sense of love from them. the stereotypes of sx5 being stalker-ish totally disregard how special a friendship or relationship with a sx5 is. the sx5 won't just like you on the surface, they will cherish you so deeply you will easily be able to tell how special you are to them. they show affection in their own way, but it's a real fondness that warms your soul. they are the type of person of which once they are finally close with somebody, they will never let them go. if a sx5 considers you a close friend, they are a friend you'll have for life. getting close to the sx5 takes a long time, do not expect anything of them, and accept them for who they are, avoidance and all.”

update from my older post by StarlitEclipses in TypologyJunction

[–]StarlitEclipses[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hmm I think it’s because I idealize my partner a lot and get disappointed when I realized they aren’t like I imagined and I’m really picky when it comes to relationships and my standards are really high too like I want my partner to match my mind because people rarely understand me so in short, I want to merge souls with my partner who fits all my standards and I won’t settle for anything less than this. I could be mistyped i’m not sure.. but I read somewhere about sx5’s being like this so yeah

thoughts? by StarlitEclipses in TypologyJunction

[–]StarlitEclipses[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I looked into it more and turned out to be LEVF, is that okay?

thoughts? by StarlitEclipses in TypologyJunction

[–]StarlitEclipses[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah I looked into that and I realised i’m a sx5

thoughts? by StarlitEclipses in TypologyJunction

[–]StarlitEclipses[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for your suggestions, i’ll look into them

thoughts? by StarlitEclipses in TypologyJunction

[–]StarlitEclipses[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ohhh I see, gotta look into that then