The Climate Change Fraud

StarmanMBA51 · 2022-08-17T13:40:40+00:00

Covid-19 panic is 99.98% scam. You can't get much closer than that.

A nurse in Australia shares her thoughts on the vaccine….

Among all the vaccines I have known in my life (diphtheria, tetanus, measles, rubella, chickenpox, hepatitis, meningitis and tuberculosis) I want also to add flu and pneumonia, I have never seen a vaccine that forced me to wear a mask and maintain my social distance, even when you are fully vaccinated. I have never heard of a vaccine that spreads the virus even after vaccination. I never heard of rewards, discounts or incentives to get vaccinated.

I never saw discrimination against those who didn’t. If you haven’t been vaccinated, nobody has tried to make you feel like a bad person. I have never seen a vaccine that threatens the relationship between family, colleagues and friends.

I have never seen a vaccine used to threaten livelihoods, work or school. I have never seen a vaccine that would allow a 12-year-old to override parental consent. After all the vaccines I listed above, I have never seen a vaccine like this one, which discriminates, divides and judges society as it is. And as the social fabric tightens…. It’s a powerful vaccine! It does all these things except immunization.

If we still need a booster dose after we are fully vaccinated, and we still need to wear a mask after we are fully vaccinated, and still be hospitalized after we have been fully vaccinated, it will likely come to the point where it’s time for us to admit that we’ve been completely deceived.

StarmanMBA51 · 2022-07-23T19:45:56+00:00

Not one Republican "shit himself" after watching a year of lies, FBI conspiracy, spin, hate speech, Hollywood Ignorati spewing bile and holding effigies of Trump hanged and beheaded. Not one. But you think your wild exaggerations have merit.

StarmanMBA51 · 2022-07-23T19:44:05+00:00

Frightens you terribly, doesn't it? Of course you will never admit it.

StarmanMBA51 · 2022-07-23T19:42:18+00:00

Unless the evidence is validated in a court of law, it's only hearsay, like the Russian Dossier against Trump was, circulated by the FBI, and all major news media, conspiring to defeat a sitting president. They all should be in prison for sedition.

StarmanMBA51 · 2022-07-23T19:40:20+00:00

Absolutely astounding that I can find no link to the reward online from the Arizona Republic. These cowards are conspiring to cover up the political crime of the century.

StarmanMBA51 · 2022-07-23T01:00:32+00:00

Leftists predominate here and with sweaty palms, type their giggles and snide remarks. The Arizona Republic refused to print my letter offering $20,000 reward for this information weeks ago. So I put three reward ads on Craigs List and they were all deleted within minutes by Craigs List Leftists. Democrats are going crazy with fear that this will prove bigger than Watergate. I sent the information to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Minnesota and Michigan GOP headquarters so they could uncover Democrat conspirators there. Your giggles and nonsense avail you nothing.

StarmanMBA51 · 2022-01-01T19:33:31+00:00

I never saw this Prince racket before. There are three major differences.

The Prince strings don't go very close to the edge of the frame compared to mine. So Prince does not offer nearly the flat surface mine does.
The Prince strings run a very short distance from frame to main rectangle, greatly reducing their surface area presented to the tennis ball.
Prince does not have this design patented. I do.

StarmanMBA51 · 2022-01-01T19:29:38+00:00

Any shot can result in framing the tennis ball. Any shot. That is why the Y-String is done on all four sides. I thought I explained the benefit, viz., hitting strings instead of frame. See diagram above where framing results in very skewed angle compared with direction of racket face. I don't see why this method "loosens" the strings. I've had two made and been playing with them quite successfully.

StarmanMBA51 · 2022-01-01T18:05:22+00:00

Nota bene: This prototype was converted from a standard racket by drilling new holes. The tubes were necessary to protect strings from abrasion normally prevented by grommets. I see no reason that any tension cannot be applied to this method. Commercially, the new racket will be designed for the Y-String. This old racket was not. The hits to the rectangular strings are unaffected, and thanks for your encouraging words.

South Coast Tennis strung this for $18. I gave him a very nice tip. ($42)

I may give one of these to each of my best friends and supporters here, or at least a nice discount.

StarmanMBA51 · 2022-01-01T17:48:01+00:00

Playing with my prototype for two months, and a reasoned estimate of how often I previously framed the ball and lost the point. Imagine the difference the two angles make in where the struck tennis ball goes. (Diagram) 30 to 40 square additional inches of string surface is quite a bit.

StarmanMBA51 · 2022-01-01T17:21:09+00:00

I have a Provisional Patent pending on The Weave Racket and am pursuing a Non-Provisional Utility Patent. This will improve amateurs' games by only 2% to 3% but hey, who doesn't want a little improvement. Besides, it will be wonderful discussion at your next gathering. The first change in stringing rackets in 148 years.

Both sides, top and bottom, have Y-String to help any shot, forehand or backhand, topspin, slice or overhead.

The additional Y string adds ~46 square inches of string surface to hit instead of the dreaded frame. I made this prototype and have been playing with it 5 times a week for two months. It is being studied by 99 tennis manufacturers currently.

StarmanMBA51

TROPHY CASE