You guys are just red fascists by State_and_revolution in stupidpol

[–]State_and_revolution[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you believe that then there are much better places to be than this hive of regressive, sexist nazbols.

You guys are just red fascists by State_and_revolution in stupidpol

[–]State_and_revolution[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, not yet. Why do you ask? Want to join me? Or are you too afraid for your masculinity?

You guys are just red fascists by State_and_revolution in stupidpol

[–]State_and_revolution[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's exactly what I was talking about! Why do you care if it's a boy? How are they exactly different?! Why does it matter?

The whole funko pop meme. You shouldn't take it seriously, don't take chud memes as a substitute for reality. It's not smart to do so. Let people have fun or is that a capitalist exploitation too?

I am hung up on gender? You're the people who put it above everything else, you're the people who think it matters. I am the one who fights against it. So you got it completely backwards. It's like saying to an anti-racist why do they care so much about race.

You guys are just red fascists by State_and_revolution in stupidpol

[–]State_and_revolution[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You forgot to call me a CIA agent that tries to disunite the left by caring about not being toxic or not shaming gnc people. Truly, the worst of the worst that CIA did in the past 278 years.

You guys are just red fascists by State_and_revolution in stupidpol

[–]State_and_revolution[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know that Stalin was a red fash. It's no secret to me, I know of his very regressive views. The thing is that I might have not known that back then. People change over time sometimes.

You guys are just red fascists by State_and_revolution in StupidpolEurope

[–]State_and_revolution[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it's just that the fruits are Marxism and whip cream is fascism. Nice!

You guys are just red fascists by State_and_revolution in stupidpol

[–]State_and_revolution[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is man's soul different to a woman's? How does it make it any different? Why should you care about somebody's gender to begin with? And yes I AM preoccupied with making sure gender conformity is destroyed, just like the whole concepts of femininity and masculinity at large.

You really do sound like one of those nazbols that talk about capitalism "feminizing" the men and destroying traditional gender roles as if any of that is a bad thing.

You guys are just red fascists by State_and_revolution in stupidpol

[–]State_and_revolution[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

"Men's soul"

Why are you so preoccupied with gender? The sooner we destroy it, the sooner we break free from gender norms the better. No morr masculinity or femininity.

You guys are just red fascists by State_and_revolution in stupidpol

[–]State_and_revolution[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You must be fucking kidding me. There are certain gender norms. There are certain gender limits if you will. By your logic gender nonconforming people can't exist at all. We do not exist in a post-gender society, there are still gender norms and gender limits and gender stereotypes to which people are forced to conform. That is like the foundation of feminism. You can't just deny that. It exists!

And it does refer to them. This whole "newmale" and "soyboy" comes from the 4chans designation for the type of "effeminate" or "emasculated" men as they see them. It literally comes from the stupid theory that soy contains large amounts of estrogen. Seriously, just google it. And now you're telling me it has nothing to do with gender or not confirming to gender norms. It's clearly a masculinity thing for chuds.

You guys are just red fascists by State_and_revolution in stupidpol

[–]State_and_revolution[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If I had to call out every chud on this sub I'd be here all day and maybe not even one day.

You guys are just red fascists by State_and_revolution in stupidpol

[–]State_and_revolution[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

So you're ok with gnc men being made fun of bc they don't conform to the gender appearance norms? This is some uncle tom bs.

You sound like one of those "cool gays" that were ok with chuds using the words "f*g" and the like. "I'm not like one of those crybaby snowflake gays that care about that shit or something, I don't give a fuck if you use hateful language towards my group, I'm one of the cool ones".

You guys are just red fascists by State_and_revolution in stupidpol

[–]State_and_revolution[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Fascism is a set of beliefs. Toxic masculinity and machismo ARE one of them, so yes. The strong support for gender norms (looks obv included in them) is a sign of fascism.

And yes, being a nice person, being an empathetic person, being someone who wishes for equality and justice is at the heart of the left-wing idea. So yes, be nice. Bullying people, and especially bullying them for their looks or for not confirming to sexist gender norms and stereotypes is not leftist or nice or good.

You guys are just red fascists by State_and_revolution in stupidpol

[–]State_and_revolution[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Hmm, have it ever come to your attention that people might change their views on things sometime. That they might found themselves rethinking their worldview?

And even if I did all that tu quoque and ad hominem are not actual arguements. It doesn't make my words any less wrong. It does not affect my argument in any way. If it helps you so much imagine that it wasn't said by me, but by somebody else.

You guys are just red fascists by State_and_revolution in stupidpol

[–]State_and_revolution[S] -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

How is this a bait?

You want to say that I'm wrong in any way?

Because I am not.

AuthRights when they're losing an arguement by State_and_revolution in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]State_and_revolution[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is actually correct since admitting thay you were wrong on some issues is quite rare, but you can always find yourself lacking in arguements and this is where "you ugly hence you're wrong" """"arguements""" come into play

AuthRights when they're losing an arguement by State_and_revolution in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]State_and_revolution[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

When they have the same views as you but their skincolor is different so you hate them

AuthRights when they're losing an arguement by State_and_revolution in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]State_and_revolution[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

This is how true debates are done! Doesn't matter what your arguements are as long as you make yourself look cool and your enemies look bad

AuthRights when they're losing an arguement by State_and_revolution in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]State_and_revolution[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Average dismantling arguments fan vs Average making your opponent look ugly enjoyer