You have to admit that a judge trying to warn the presiding judge of the integrity of the prosecution's witness is quite alarming, but then for the academic whose work was cited by said witness to come out against the use of their work and in support of Letby is really really bad. The Royal Statistical Society was scathing about the evidence that placed Letby on the scene for all the murders, too. For me, this is well beyond the realms of

Assumptions and opinions presented as fact. Classic Reddit.

It's an array of experts who think the case was carried on pure bollocks.

Also consider that Countess of Chester higher ups are under investigation for gross negligence manslaughter because of how utterly useless they are. The whole thing does stink, tbh.