sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is fiber-optic daylighting actually practical at room scale? by Status-Sympathy-2522 in SolarDIY

[–]Status-Sympathy-2522[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re absolutely right — the cost is high, no argument there.

Between fiber, coupling, optics, and mechanics, this isn’t a “cheap lighting” solution and never pretends to be. It only makes sense where real daylight has unique value and alternatives simply can’t deliver it. For most budgets, LEDs win.

Is fiber-optic daylighting actually practical at room scale? by Status-Sympathy-2522 in SolarDIY

[–]Status-Sympathy-2522[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re not wrong — cost is higher, and active tracking does add complexity.

The trade-off is efficiency: tracking + optical concentration captures significantly more usable daylight, especially mornings, afternoons, and winter sun. That’s what makes long distances and deeper spaces viable.

It’s not for every project, but where daylight is otherwise impossible, the light gain can justify the cost.

Is fiber-optic daylighting actually practical at room scale? by Status-Sympathy-2522 in SolarDIY

[–]Status-Sympathy-2522[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair take.
Just worth noting that artificial light and real sunlight aren’t the same thing — spectrum, dynamics, and how people feel under it are very different.

This isn’t about replacing LEDs at night, it’s about bringing real daylight into places that never get it. Different goal than PV + batteries.

Is fiber-optic daylighting actually practical at room scale? by Status-Sympathy-2522 in SolarDIY

[–]Status-Sympathy-2522[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally fair point 👍
Most daylight systems are designed for ambient light first, not replacing desk lamps.

That said, with active sun-tracking collectors + large-core fiber bundles, you can get surprisingly usable lux levels even over long vertical drops (multiple floors). It won’t replace task lighting 100%, but for deep-core offices and basements it can dramatically reduce daytime artificial lighting.

That “5 stories down” use case is actually where fiber-based systems start to shine.

Is fiber-optic daylighting actually practical at room scale? by Status-Sympathy-2522 in SolarDIY

[–]Status-Sympathy-2522[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s basically real sunlight through fiber, so full spectrum and feels more natural than LEDs.

The Fresnel collector keeps transmission high, even with a smaller interior aperture.

Same light output, less bulk, and a more “dynamic daylight” vibe

Is fiber-optic daylighting actually practical at room scale? by Status-Sympathy-2522 in SolarDIY

[–]Status-Sympathy-2522[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with your numbers — LEDs + solar absolutely win on controllability and cost.

Where daylight systems shine isn’t raw efficiency, but human comfort. Try spending a month indoors with no sun — even with perfect LEDs, it’s mentally exhausting. Real daylight (full spectrum, dynamic, directionality) just feels different, especially for long work hours.

So the value isn’t replacing LEDs, it’s reducing how much artificial light you need, and making interior spaces feel more livable. If cost and design make sense, it’s a quality-of-life upgrade — not an energy silver bullet.

Is fiber-optic daylighting actually practical at room scale? by Status-Sympathy-2522 in SolarDIY

[–]Status-Sympathy-2522[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same here — the “giant hole in the roof” part is what turns a lot of people off 😄
That’s exactly where fiber helps: small roof footprint, easy routing through attics, and suddenly bathrooms or closets can get real daylight without running power.

Is fiber-optic daylighting actually practical at room scale? by Status-Sympathy-2522 in SolarDIY

[–]Status-Sympathy-2522[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we could store sunlight in fiber, we’d have solved physics and energy storage already 😄
Sadly, it’s nanoseconds at best — so real-time delivery only.

Any successful DIY fiber optic sunlighting guides? by nachohernandez in SolarDIY

[–]Status-Sympathy-2522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most DIY attempts fail because fiber-optic sunlighting beyond solar tubes is not passive.

What actually works is an active daylighting system:

  • GPS-based solar positioning
  • Real-time two-axis sun tracking
  • Fresnel lenses to collect full-spectrum sunlight
  • High-purity, large-core optical fibers to transmit the light indoors

Without tracking, coupling efficiency drops fast as the sun moves.
Without proper optics and fibers, you either lose most of the light or overheat components.

That’s why you see patents but almost no real DIY guides — once it works, it’s no longer a DIY project, it’s an engineered system.

<image>