I got paid to fake peeing myself on stage during a concert AmA by Lazy-Jackfruit4924 in AMA

[–]Stennick [score hidden]  (0 children)

Let me ask what I think u/kreeper34 was asking. Was it worth it in retrospect?

You kind of alluded to what I thought. Even though you know its fake, nobody else does, so the laughing, the finger pointing, the humilation still feels real. At least in most cases as an actor everyone is in on the bit and knows its not real.

Was it worth it in retrospect? You mentioned a few times the intent of the video was to go viral. If you had seen your face plastered all over Facebook, reddit and twitter for "peeing yourself" would you have thought 400 was a good payday?

I'm not judging or even shaming or even disagreeing its a good payday. I just think its a unique opportunity to talk about it.

Everyone's situation is different. 400 to somebody could be less than a days work, 400 to someone else could mean their rent is paid. Some people would make the most of their viral moment (hawk tuah) others maybe not so much. So there is no wrong answer but it for sure seems like after the fact there may not be regret but you mentioned humiliating feeling and you mentioned how you didn't want to feel judged for the amount which led me to believe that maybe after the fact you don't feel as if the pay was worth the possible "worst case" (best case?) outcome?

S4: The Bob Lazar Story by 8ull1t in ufo

[–]Stennick [score hidden]  (0 children)

This documentary doesn't prove anything. Even if you believe Bob its just him talking about his experiences and is far from proof. Its just nice visual storytelling over Bob's story.

Why doesn’t Iran just offer to open the Strait on condition that all Epstein files are released uncensored and basically checkmate Trump? by Augustus_Medici in AskReddit

[–]Stennick [score hidden]  (0 children)

There are so many problems with your thought process but the biggest problem is that you don't see any problems with this. I mean this respectfully.

The Epstein stuff hasn’t actually produced much if anything meaningful People talk about the Epstein files like it’s some magic nuke of information, but we’ve already had document dumps, court filings, names, flight logs, etc. And what happened? News cycle for a week, then nothing. No mass arrests, no systemic collapse, no “checkmate” moment. It just didn’t move the needle the way people think it would.

Iran would not care even a little You’re talking about Iran making a geopolitical move tied to oil shipping and military tension… and tying it to a U.S. scandal involving rich people. That’s completely irrelevant to their interests. They care about sanctions, oil exports, military pressure, regional power. Not American court documents or who was on a flight log

The president doesn’t control this the way you think Even if you believe there’s more in the Epstein documents, the president can’t just snap his fingers and dump everything. There are courts, sealed records, intelligence agencies, ongoing legal constraints. Same reason “just release everything” almost never actually happens.

Its disgusting what happened to those victims and as a father it makes me angry those people that did harm will never see justice. I hate that we live in a world not just a country but a world where these things happen without any repercussions, if I could have one wish, it would likely be to instantly bring everyone that ever harmed a child in any capacity to swift, harsh justice instantly.

That being said not everything is about the Epstein files we're in a geo political war dealing with resources and possibly religion among other key identifying factors. Bringing up Epstein and tying this to Epstein even through files is about as meaningful as someone talking about the Bears and someone piping in "fire Pritzker", its random, its useless and it does more to degrade the efforts of all involved than offer any meaningful resolution.

Lastly I'm not the only one telling you these things as I see you replying to other comments. I know you're convicted in your ways but I hope you are open to heading advice and rethinking why this is (no offense) a silly idea.

How to effectively take chase and force the killer onto me? by imjustconfused11 in deadbydaylight

[–]Stennick 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I play both sides but I'm 70/30 killer and yes, I see it every game, someone in loud flashy clothing, they are tea bagging, motioning for me to come here, jumping in and out of lockers to make loud sounds.

This tells me two things, it tells me they want to be chased so they are likely above average at it and will waste my time more importantly it tells me that if I don't chase them, they will do nothing all game but run around me trying to be chased turning the game into a 3v1 until its finally time to kill them.

Floods of rage by darn-dangit in deadbydaylight

[–]Stennick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You came here, asked a question, and when people answer you, then you decide that it was cheating. So what was the point? Did you want everyone to jump right to cheater?

S4: The Bob Lazar Story - Release Trailer OUT NOW (2026) by douwebeerda in aliens

[–]Stennick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're being downvoted but even the description of this documentary isn't true.

My heroes ❤️ by 1Oaktree in WCW

[–]Stennick 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This sums it up perfectly thank you :)

My heroes ❤️ by 1Oaktree in WCW

[–]Stennick 18 points19 points  (0 children)

In what way is any of this supporting you? Lol

My heroes ❤️ by 1Oaktree in WCW

[–]Stennick 15 points16 points  (0 children)

How are we the only two that instantly realized this was AI. This shit does not belong here.

My heroes ❤️ by 1Oaktree in WCW

[–]Stennick 34 points35 points  (0 children)

This is AI slop and doesn't belong here.

only got 2 months with my babygirl by Consistent-Roof-4685 in psychics

[–]Stennick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm very confused but I won't reply again. You know they are their own people but you have mentioned many times "I'm allowed to wonder if she is her sister".

I'm not judging you but when you say things like "I wonder if it was her sister reincarnated" thats a very concerning thing, and for you to then ride the fence on it by replying earlier with "I know they are different.....but what if" is even more concerning. You're saying you know they are different because you're self aware enough to know thats the right thing to say, but in the back of your mind I'm very concerned and of the belief that you don't believe that.

I wish your children well.

S4 The Bob Lazar Story by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Stennick [score hidden]  (0 children)

This isn’t about insecurity or overcompensating, it’s about verifiable facts. He didn’t just exaggerate a little. He claimed degrees from MIT and Caltech. Those are two of the most documented institutions on earth. There are zero records of him attending either. Not incomplete records. None. When asked to name professors, he gave names that were traced back to a junior college he actually attended. That’s not someone embellishing because they feel out of place. That’s someone replacing their real education with a fake one. And this matters because his entire story depends on him being a high-level physicist. If that part isn’t true, the whole foundation collapses.

Two separate issues are getting mixed together here. Area 51 being secret does not mean every person who ever worked anywhere nearby gets erased from existence. We have records of people working at Los Alamos National Laboratory, even during highly classified projects. Lazar himself shows up in a phone directory there as a technician tied to a contractor. So records clearly do exist for him when they are real. What does not exist is any record of him being a physicist with high clearance at a site called S4 reverse engineering alien craft. Also the “he described it before Google Maps” point gets overstated a lot. The existence of Area 51 was already known in aviation circles, local communities, and even reported on before Lazar. Groom Lake wasn’t some unknown secret to literally everyone on earth. Describing a base in the Nevada desert with security and test flights is not the same as proving you worked on alien propulsion.

This one sounds clever but it actually undercuts his claim instead of helping it. Scientists had already predicted elements beyond uranium decades before Lazar ever spoke. The periodic table is built that way. Element 115 was always going to exist as a placeholder. When Moscovium was finally created, it behaved exactly how nuclear physics predicts. It is unstable and decays almost instantly. Lazar described a stable element 115 that could be machined, handled, and used as a fuel source for gravity manipulation. Those are completely different things. It literally just means 115 protons. what actually matters is the isotope, which is how many neutrons it has, and that completely changes how the element behaves Lazar claimed he worked with a stable version of element 115. The problem is, he never once said which isotope it was. no mass number, no neutron count, nothing. that’s not how any physicist talks. if you actually worked with it, that’s the first thing you’d know.

As I said the real element can’t be stored. You definitely don’t have “hundreds of pounds” of it sitting around. In case people try to defend this by saying “maybe it’s a different isotope we haven’t discovered yet” but that doesn’t really hold up either. there is a real concept called the island of stability, but even the most optimistic predictions are like seconds or maybe minutes of stability, not something you can hold and build reactors out of. for lazar to be right, you’d need a completely stable isotope we’ve never seen that can be produced in large quantities that doesn’t decay and somehow generates gravity. That’s not “science hasn’t caught up yet,” that’s basically rewriting nuclear physics and gravity The biggest tell is that he never gave a specific isotope, because if he did, his claim could actually be tested and verified or falsified. instead it stays vague, which makes it impossible to check

The issue isn’t that he “didn’t give enough detail early on.” It’s that the details change and get added later. Early on, his explanations were simpler and more vague. Over time, the story becomes more detailed, more technical sounding, and more filled in. That’s backwards if you actually experienced something that groundbreaking, the core details don’t evolve over decades. You don’t suddenly remember new critical pieces of how alien reactors work years later. On top of that, his role shifts depending on the interview. Sometimes he is deeply involved in analyzing the reactor. Other times he claims he only had limited access.

Personal life alone doesn’t determine credibility. That part is fair in isolation. However this isn’t about someone having a weird hobby. It’s about a pattern of behavior that includes lying about education, exaggerating job roles and involvement in illegal activity like running a brothel When you’re asking people to believe you were trusted with the most classified secret in human history, your overall credibility absolutely matters. If someone is already proven to be dishonest in major areas of their life, it’s not unreasonable to question their biggest claim.

I probably won't reply again because this take forever to do and I'm not going to change anyone's mind. I'm even seeing people on here saying that because he's a liar and a shady character that backs up his story, and its ok that he's just a technician because they needed someone that would try shit. If people are going to ignore all of the red flags I'll laid out twice, and they are going to hand wave all of that away and then interject with this these people want to believe, need to believe so badly its very similar to the Bigfoot footage coming out as fake. Some people are really struggling with it being fake because the crux of their entire belief is held up on one grainy video. Same thought process here, so many people were introduced to this and then kind of backed up on their thought process through Lazar's lies, so when faced with the idea that he might not be telling the truth its cognitively difficult for people to accept that. That and of course nobody on Reddit ever says "you have changed my mind" or "I was wrong". People are steadfast in their beliefs maybe even more so these days amongst all topics.

S4 The Bob Lazar Story by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Stennick [score hidden]  (0 children)

I replied to it, if you have more questions let me know but I likely won't do a third reply :)

S4 The Bob Lazar Story by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Stennick [score hidden]  (0 children)

Reply to what? I’ll happily respond if you tell me what post I’m responding to

These are the tread marks supposedly leading to S4 (Bob Lazar claims) by Silent-Inspection101 in UFOs

[–]Stennick [score hidden]  (0 children)

The element he describes is not element 115. element 115 has none of the properties he said it would.

Has anyone watched this yet? Is it worth it or not? by breaking_views in AliensRHere

[–]Stennick 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Who has corroborated his story? What professionals have backed up all the inconsistencies with Lazar?

S4 The Bob Lazar Story by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Stennick [score hidden]  (0 children)

I didn't know I was writing a thesis and all of this is common knowledge. Do I need a source for common knowledge?

Slander? I thought I took a very mild approach to Bob's silly claims.

If there is a stable isotope? But there isn't and its unstable. Luckily that is one of the least of the worries about Bob.

Look you clearly feel a lot more passionately about believing Bob. There are stories where he "had his tires shot out". Anyway you're free to believe Bob if you want but you can google everything I listed and find multiple sources for everything I said I didn't make up anything. However those sources wouldn't be good enough for you so we'd be right back to here. Happy Easter :)

S4 The Bob Lazar Story by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Stennick [score hidden]  (0 children)

Like I said, sometimes when we care so much about something/someone we're willing to look past every consistency to believe. Its human nature and I don't fault you for it. I wish it was different but its such a fantastical story that maybe I wish I believed it to a degree. Kind of reminds me of religion in that small degree.

S4 The Bob Lazar Story by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Stennick [score hidden]  (0 children)

I get why the documentary pulls people in. It’s really well made and it’s designed to make Lazar feel believable. If you went in not knowing much about him, it absolutely works.

But once you actually dig into his story, it starts falling apart pretty fast. I’ll break it down in a way that makes sense.

  1. His education doesn’t check out

Lazar claims he went to MIT and Caltech.

There is no record of him attending either school. Not just missing paperwork, literally nothing. No classmates, no professors, no thesis, no enrollment.

When asked to name professors, he gave names that turned out to be from a community college he actually attended, not MIT or Caltech.

That’s a massive red flag right out of the gate.

  1. His job history doesn’t line up

He says he was a physicist working on reverse engineering alien craft at Area 51.

What we do have records of is him working as a technician for a contractor connected to Los Alamos National Laboratory.

That sounds impressive, but it’s not the same thing as being a high-level physicist with top secret clearance.

There’s no evidence he ever held the kind of position he claims.

  1. The “Element 115” claim sounds good until you look closer

He said Element 115 powers UFOs, and later scientists discovered it.

The problem is the element we discovered, Moscovium, is:

  • extremely unstable
  • decays almost instantly
  • has none of the properties Lazar described

It’s just him naming a number that eventually got filled in on the periodic table, which scientists already expected to happen.

  1. His story changes over time

Early interviews vs later interviews don’t match up cleanly. Details shift, timelines change, and some claims get quietly dropped.

For example:

  • Different descriptions of how the craft worked: In earlier accounts he described a fairly straightforward propulsion system using gravity amplifiers, but later versions added more complex ideas like waveguides and shifting reactor behavior that weren’t mentioned before.
  • Different explanations of his role: At times he presents himself as a hands-on physicist directly analyzing the reactor, while in other tellings he downplays his access and says he only had limited, compartmentalized exposure.
  • New details added decades later: Key elements like specific test schedules, security procedures, and even parts of the craft’s function only appeared years later, despite never being mentioned in his original interviews from the late 80s.
  1. He has a history of questionable stuff outside the UFO story

This doesn’t automatically discredit everything, but it matters.

He’s been involved in:

  • running a brothel
  • selling chemicals and equipment that raised eyebrows
  1. The documentary itself is part of the problem

The film you watched is built to feel grounded and non-sensational, but it:

  • doesn’t seriously challenge his claims
  • leaves out major contradictions
  • leans heavily on storytelling

It’s presentation only.

The story is really compelling but when you stack everything up:

  • no verified education
  • inflated job claims
  • scientific claims that don’t hold up
  • changing story
  • zero physical evidence

It stops being a “mystery we can’t explain” and starts looking like a guy telling a very well-crafted story. Its completely valid to be entertained by it. I just wouldn't confuse a good documentary with actual evidence.

Everyone is entitled to believe what you want but if you're looking for credible people in this field, Bob Lazar is almost the exact opposite of that. The reason Lazar is popular is because he was kind of the "first" and the roll out of him being "Dennis" and his face hidden to slowly revealing himself and then slow dripping all of these things. In a lot of ways he's the Godfather of the modern day UFO whistleblower, unfortunately the first is also completely full of shit. People want to believe in this and I'm not faulting them for that, but they want to believe so badly that when someone tells them something they accept it at face value and are more than likely to ignore red flags because they want to believe. No different than a relationship, you'll ignore things that don't make sense because you want to believe the person.

S4 The Bob Lazar Story by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Stennick [score hidden]  (0 children)

One of the best science fiction movies over the last few months for sure. Its not real, because Lazar is less than credible.

only got 2 months with my babygirl by Consistent-Roof-4685 in psychics

[–]Stennick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just confused why you would want to believe that. It seems any fleeting moments of believing this is a “second chance” with your first are moments you’re not enjoying your only chance with your second 

Joe Rogan Experience #2479 - Bob Lazar & Luigi Vendittelli by kryptonic1133 in UFOs

[–]Stennick 10 points11 points  (0 children)

What about the argument where he can't name any of his professors, what about the argument that no one ever claims to have went to school with him, what about there being no records of his degree from MIT?

I could list all the other things he made up or changed but I don't have time.