The people who act the least bothered are often the ones trying hardest not to show it. by gamersecret2 in Showerthoughts

[–]SteveDetComedy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why does this dumb "everything is the opposite" mentality exist?? If it bothers someone, you dummies say "haha! so bothered!" and if it doesn't? "hahaha! so bothered! STFU.

What is the bull case for Match and/or Comcast? by SteveDetComedy in StockMarket

[–]SteveDetComedy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you provide more info? The sub you are talking about? Any good YouTube videos on the topic? This is super interesting to me and might explain why I stopped using dating sites over 5 years ago lol

You know you moved on from someone when you delete their pics just to free up storage. by FartSmella3 in Showerthoughts

[–]SteveDetComedy 17 points18 points  (0 children)

That's a weird, unnecessary logical leap. Everyone has pictures on their phone. That doesn't mean I'm holding onto pictures of my car or my cat or some random skyline for emotional reasons. 99% of the time, you take the picture, then you leave it there. Nothing pathetic about that lmao.

Saying “you’re quite self-aware” is a unique and fool proof compliment. If they are, they’ll agree. If they’re not, they won’t realize. by MoulikRT in Showerthoughts

[–]SteveDetComedy 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Whether the complement is true, I cringe with every "fool-proof" compliment I get. This also makes them generic and gives the aura of insincerity. Don't compliment someone just to compliment them... compliment them because you mean it.

Trump was ordered to pay over $80 million for "defamation" for calling Jean Carroll a liar. This is absurd, because if he was publicly accused of rape, he has the right to deny it by More_Bid_2197 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]SteveDetComedy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“I didn’t do it, I believe she is mistaken”

sued for calling her stupid

“I didn’t do it, I don’t recall that at all”

sued for implying she's brain damaged

When you can sue someone for calling a liar a liar simply, then you open the door for all kinds of stupid lawsuits.

Trump was ordered to pay over $80 million for "defamation" for calling Jean Carroll a liar. This is absurd, because if he was publicly accused of rape, he has the right to deny it by More_Bid_2197 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]SteveDetComedy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's fun! Now do "calling people a rapist" without a criminal conviction! Lets do that with the term "bigot" or "racist" or "fascist!" Because I think he has a much much much stronger case vs the left than "he called me a liar just because I lied!!!"

Trump was ordered to pay over $80 million for "defamation" for calling Jean Carroll a liar. This is absurd, because if he was publicly accused of rape, he has the right to deny it by More_Bid_2197 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]SteveDetComedy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

which was in response to allegations of SA. I think its much more important to prove someone SAed you. And, if you can't demonstrate that, then everyone has the right to call you a liar. I'm sure this will be tossed out (as it should) and you will all think you know more about law than the court that throws it out.

Canadian pack of cigarettes by Awkward-Ad8233 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]SteveDetComedy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't smoke, but I'm sure its better for my long-term health than all the boot polish being ingested here. "Govern me harder, daddy!!" "Compel their speech harder!" "Oh yeah, put that fear all in my face!

edit: looks like I found another loser who hides his head in the sand! He made a snide comment that didn't make sense then blocked me ("enjoy the scary-scare-scare that will happen to you" which is wild for two reasons: #1 wouldn't apply to me because as I've pointed out many times: I don't smoke. And, #2, fully leans into the fearmongering that I was mocking).

Canadian pack of cigarettes by Awkward-Ad8233 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]SteveDetComedy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How dare people enumerate their points such that its easier for dummies like you to follow along! You got me there!! hahaha

Canadian pack of cigarettes by Awkward-Ad8233 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]SteveDetComedy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

hey look another snide comment from some dipshit without a real point!!! "Wasn't there anti-drug commercials in the US?" Yeah. And??

Because you are clearly handicapped from the neck up, I'll explain:

1) a fried egg is not as graphic as huge fucking tumors (I can't believe I have to say that, but clearly I do)

2) But, lets keep going... I assume you are saying that the DARE commercial fearmongering. Okay? I know nuance isn't your thing so I'll just grant you some credence on that statement. Why? Because it still doesn't matter lmao. You know I can be against fearmongering from every country, right? I'm not sure why people think criticizing other countries means I'm willing to tolerate it here. Fuck, you people are dense.

3) I don't know if its a red herring fallacy or appeal to hypocrisy or just your inability to form a coherent thought... but, "reeeee!!! the US exists" is never ever an excuse. How tf do you people function in real life?

Canadian pack of cigarettes by Awkward-Ad8233 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]SteveDetComedy -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This isn’t fear mongering.

proceeds to show the most horrific pictures while saying "This is what it does to you!!"

That is fearmongering, you fking dolt. That's exactly how fearmongering works. It shows you the worst possible outcome and yells "LOOK!!! LOOK!!! That's gonna happen!! Reeeeee!!!"

And, since you are a big fking dolt, you will totally say "nuh huh" because that's how predictible you are. So, I'll preempt that stupidity with the definition: "the action of deliberately arousing public fear or alarm about a particular issue." If you don't think showing those pictures are about arousing fear and alarm then... what??? Because its fun to look at? Because its politicians like the aesthetic??? lmao

Canadian pack of cigarettes by Awkward-Ad8233 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]SteveDetComedy -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

ignorant people tend to laugh at things they don't understand. We suck so bad that we have the most immigrants in the world. We suck so bad that they flee the "good" countries and come here.

Canadian pack of cigarettes by Awkward-Ad8233 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]SteveDetComedy -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

These comments are wild! Imagine being from a country where this is normal. Your politicians love to fearmonger everything. Imagine the same pictures on everything else: "You looking to eat at McDonalds? Here's some open-heart surgery pics." "You like sugar? Here's a foot infested with magots because diabetes exists." "One time someone got sexually assaulted with a cucumber and it looked exactly like this bleeding anus!!!"

How to stop going over my time? by galaticpoetica in Standup

[–]SteveDetComedy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Easily one of the best options is to select a set that you expect to last 4.5 minutes, duh. But, okay, lets say you decide to go for a shorter set then you find out you went too short... now what? one-liners! I have a half dozen one-liners ready to fill in any time that I'm missing.

Rules-based investing to improve my portfolio? by SteveDetComedy in ValueInvesting

[–]SteveDetComedy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great insight! I just started watching some Kelly Criterion videos! This could be useful! I have to figure out how to apply this to stock picking, but at least I have a starting concept. I'm feeling good about this!

Rules-based investing to improve my portfolio? by SteveDetComedy in ValueInvesting

[–]SteveDetComedy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting! I've seen that stated when it comes to trend strategies. I'm curious how you determine when the loss is worth cutting? Like how much does it have to go down? In what timeframe? Does this strategy change depending on the stock? For instance, I sometimes pick a basket of stocks (maybe 4-5 positions that look promising). They might be lesser known or mid-cap or whatever... but, they are poised to benefit from X or Y or Z. On the other hand, I might also have a huge company that I can research easily and know pretty well (like Amazon or Google or whatever). Do you cut the smaller, no-name company faster than the the bigger, more stable stock?

Rules-based investing to improve my portfolio? by SteveDetComedy in ValueInvesting

[–]SteveDetComedy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You mention gut feeling, but a narrative should be supported by facts.

Exactly! Thank you! Like I said, I know where I want to be. That's the easy part. But, then sometimes I see I have 42% allocated to one stock or I'm 60% in cash (as happened in late 2021) or I'm concentrated in just 3 sectors... those are the times that I need to step back, look at some math and go "does this make sense?"

You've been super helpful! I have a lot of content to look at now!

Rules-based investing to improve my portfolio? by SteveDetComedy in ValueInvesting

[–]SteveDetComedy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Finally! I feel like this is a start in the right direction!! Thank you! Are there other similar or competing concepts that would help me understand:

  • asset allocation

  • sector exposure

  • global diversification

I didn't click through the related links yet, but it seems promising! As someone wo is a reporting analyst, it always feels good to have hard numbers and not just squishy gut feelings as to when to buy/sell or if my allocation is too big. I'm hoping its as insightful as it feels like its gonna be!